There's something about this defense that I find a tad deceptive and condescending, and if I was a juror it would completely turn me off, mistrust them from the get-go, rather than think they are serious.
When she was cross-examining Luis R she spoke to him like he was 10 years old, about showing him pictures. This is also smoke and mirrors, because LR never saw the Adelsons as far as I know, so how would he identify them by picture? Didn't they only have a photo of Dan? He would have been looking for the females' ages to see which one would be the mother of the kindergarten children, is my guess.
There is a lot of evidence that it was Donna who was meddling in every way and did not respect Dan. I don't think it's smart to pretend that she liked Dan because he was a great guy and that she was a sweet loving grandma setting up Skype, and wasn't the email writer. It would be a good strategy if there wasn't so much other evidence, like the divorce, the bump, the phone calls, the tickets to Vietnam, etc.
It's important for jurors not to lose respect for any lawyer. IMO
A better strategy would be to say she clearly took Wendi's side in the divorce and said some awful things, but she had no idea what Charlie was up to.
When she was cross-examining Luis R she spoke to him like he was 10 years old, about showing him pictures. This is also smoke and mirrors, because LR never saw the Adelsons as far as I know, so how would he identify them by picture? Didn't they only have a photo of Dan? He would have been looking for the females' ages to see which one would be the mother of the kindergarten children, is my guess.
There is a lot of evidence that it was Donna who was meddling in every way and did not respect Dan. I don't think it's smart to pretend that she liked Dan because he was a great guy and that she was a sweet loving grandma setting up Skype, and wasn't the email writer. It would be a good strategy if there wasn't so much other evidence, like the divorce, the bump, the phone calls, the tickets to Vietnam, etc.
It's important for jurors not to lose respect for any lawyer. IMO
A better strategy would be to say she clearly took Wendi's side in the divorce and said some awful things, but she had no idea what Charlie was up to.