It would help to see a picture of what you mean.
But here are some questions as well--why would the man have a bike helmet on to drive a car?
And if the scent dogs have it right, that his scent trails back to Mosaic--why would he not have put a bike in the car for the return to Mosaic?
And if he has no bike with him, why wear the helmet on the mile walk back? (It was 81 degrees that day in Orlando. Wearing a bike helmet for a mile walk, no shade, would be hot, to say the least.)
https://www.wunderground.com/histor...statename=&reqdb.zip=&reqdb.magic=&reqdb.wmo=
The problem with videos like this is that you can kind of see what you want to. If you know what I mean. I see a kid in Dickies, tapered at the ankle. Doc Martins, with a pompadour style hair cut, perhaps with a man-bun in back. White T and pressed slacks. And I've seen a lot of men sport this look in Miami. (I've only been to Orlando very briefly) I've also seen this style in LA and NY.
But I can also see a guy with a helmet on. Only, does the helmet make sense to the rest of what is occurring?
Even if the camera has night vision, there is nothing to indicate that the clothing was dark. As in brown or black. If you look at the shrubbery near him, it's lighter than it probably was viewing it in real life, but you can tell it's a dark shade. Where as the slacks and shirt appear light in color.
We know that Mosaic condos had no security until two weeks after Jennifer went missing (if the guy's report earlier on this thread is correct)--and they had no CCTV either. And we know that Jennifer's car doesn't make it very far from Mosaic, with the POI appearing to return to Mosaic directly after getting that car off site.
Why would someone who was working as a security guard be at Mosaic, or be linked to this crime as it happened? And wouldn't someone like this have stood out more, say to the gardners who were there working that morning?
For this to have been a security guard, this individual would have dressed up for work, then gone to Mosaic (again why?), done what was done, then park the car, and walk back to Mosaic--all in an outfit that kind of stands out....then why didn't anyone notice him?
And there is the possibility that workers at Mosaic may have been protecting someone. But why would they protect a stranger?
It's all totally possible, but I'm not quite sure how this theory works with the rest of the evidence.
But maybe....
Yeah, I have looked at my blowups of that head shot on a number of screens including my large screen tv. The curvature is perfect, with a rounding, plateau, and sloped indentation back to head. I have spent a lot of time in past looking at pictures of bike helmets to match, and posted some and updated at times. The years go by and I forget a lot of this stuff. The best match I found was a Rudy Project bike helmet, including possible POLICE logoed helmets. I have them pictured on my page.
The casualness of the clothes is interesting. The first problem is the color. We know this camera had a nighttime vision during day problem, the police uniforms showed up light when they looked at it. But rather than inform the public that the images were color distorted, they said don't worry about the clothes. Well worse than not worrying about it, people take a look at it, "see" a white tshirt and white casual pants, and say painter, cook, some worker abducted Jennifer and probably has fled the country. And we haven't moved off that needle in eleven plus years.
So the clothes aren't white, and that's part of the look of casualness. The second problem is that is not a casual tshirt. There is some gear on his back and a tubular artifact from belt down, not suitable for bike riding. Resembles a baton or flashlight or rounded carrying bag of some sort but I wouldn't rule out an artificial image artifact, it is perfectly rounded. This is in the original image, people see it as an arm and see the cutoff of white as a short sleeved tshirt. In fact, the arm can't be seen and unknown if shirt is short sleeved.
The third problem is that due to movement during time lapse photography and severe aspect distortion, among the artifacts seen is an LE type shoulder patch in image 1. It's insufficient to indicate LE on its own, but with everything else and an LE shaped badge in image 3 it is consistent.
The fourth is pants. They are not pressed slacks to be sure. But they are consistent with a bike riding LE with the strapped down ankle, what appears to be athletic socks, and shoes that are consistent with that uniform. This is a very unusual combo, but I have seen it described as regulation military bike security uniform. At one point I had some regs I found that described it but I lost them and couldn't find them again.
In addition to possiblly resembling a military uniform, take a look on my page at the security guard uniform I found later in 2007 after intensive searching, and the elements are all there.
