- Joined
- Apr 22, 2011
- Messages
- 2,233
- Reaction score
- 15,123
And maybe it also points to an "insider" that she was taken at her vehicle. Would a worker have lurked, out of the way, closer to her apartment?
then why was the car moved?I'm leaning towards the idea that she didn't leave the apartment complex, was attacked somewhere inside and buried in concrete. No one saw anything, no body was found. Very lucky...
I’m not sure if they can say for certain that the wake up call always was in the way to work. Rob’s first statement was she called him when she woke up (Nancy Grace 2/7/2006). He’s also said that he overslept, tried to call and text her before he left his place, he tried to call and text her when he was driving to work, and he texted her before he went into the 9 am meeting. The range they’ve given for Jennifer leaving for work was anytime between 7:30 and 8:15.I hesitate to bring this up, but a long time ago there was much discussion about her being taken the evening before vs. in the a.m. The phone battery going "out" (or off, or whatever) and the knock at the door would obviously point to that. Also, what time was the usual wake up call to Travis? I thought it was one her way to work, but maybe I'm mistaken. If she usually called him before she was out the door, that would also point more toward an evening incident.
I think the car is key. Her car was moved at least twice. It wasn’t driven very far according to the gas level. The car wasn’t at Mosaic when the manager looked around 11:30 am. HOTG is a very short 5 minute drive so it didn’t go directly from point a Mosaic to point b Huntington on the Green. I think this suggests the crime scene wasn’t at Mosaic.then why was the car moved?
wait... there were men staying at her apartment other than her current bf? do you mean her actual unit or just the same building?This is common knowledge, in fact the ex-boyfriend was also one of the men staying at her apartment that weekend while she was on vacation with her new boyfriend.
Generally, he has been presumed innocent for some reasons or another, and I don't believe he has a criminal history. I have (just) read that he supposedly showed up to his job the following morning, which would make him an unlikely suspect if true. But I haven't read anything definitive. He is definitely a logical suspect, by circumstance, in the event he cannot be ruled out.
I get the sense those close to the case presume him to be innocent, and don't want to subject him to public scrutiny by mentioning him.
yeah, disposing of the body strongly suggests it was someone she knew.someone who knew her met her at her car. they were out there waiting for her or working on getting her to come out..theres just no reason for all the cover up...now why is this person so angry? need Joe K's take on this one. mOO
Her ex-boyfriend was friends with her brother. The brother and a few friends, IIRC, including the ex-boyfriend, stayed at her apartment while she was on vacay with Rob. The ex actually left his phone there. Which is now really suspicious to me. That never really registered before. What is the typical stunt you do if you want to see someone again? Leave something in their vehicle. Their house, etc. If I remember right, I think her brother is the one who called her when she got in from the trip and told her that the ex had left his phone there.wait... there were men staying at her apartment other than her current bf? do you mean her actual unit or just the same building?
Maybe, but if a stranger kidnaps someone at their vehicle, they need a place to leave the body. Any old dumpster would do and if it isn't found before it's emptied, you're home free.yeah, disposing of the body strongly suggests it was someone she knew.