FrayedKnot
Former Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2011
- Messages
- 4,693
- Reaction score
- 52
Well, the courts did not see Josh Powell as a danger either, so I think they have a low bar for that decision.
Jinx! I didn't read back before I posted downthread!
Well, the courts did not see Josh Powell as a danger either, so I think they have a low bar for that decision.
I think he sued for more time with the kids, maybe to decrease his child support payments?
I think he sued for more time with the kids, maybe to decrease his child support payments?
So was her other son and his dad took him away too. Should he have been made to stay also?
Do you have a link to this? I wouldn't think a "dead beat dad" would go to the bother of sueing his ex gf to get more time with the kids even if it lessed the $$$. Dead beat dads, just don't pay at all, they don't see the kids, or have anything to do with them. They don't hire lawyers and spend that kind of $$$ to get more time with their kids. JMO
So you don't think he wanted to really spend time with his kids??? Really?
I absolutely know this won't be popular but there's no way in hell I'd allow my children to see people that talk bad about me and think I disappeared their missing parent, especially if I were innocent of that crime. & then bc I'm so very protective of my children, I'd move them a thousand miles away or more once I was cleared.
Now, do I believe Yvonne should see the twins? Of course I do. Do I think it's right they're being kept away? No I don't...but I know I'd do the same thing of I were innocent & I were afraid that my children's grandparents would turn them against me.
I absolutely know this won't be popular but there's no way in hell I'd allow my children to see people that talk bad about me and think I disappeared their missing parent, especially if I were innocent of that crime. & then bc I'm so very protective of my children, I'd move them a thousand miles away or more once I was cleared.
Now, do I believe Yvonne should see the twins? Of course I do. Do I think it's right they're being kept away? No I don't...but I know I'd do the same thing of I were innocent & I were afraid that my children's grandparents would turn them against me.
Why? Does his father have a violent criminal record, too? Is he a POI in a missing person's case?
I look at it this way. If I was the last one to see my partner, but I was innocent, then I would have no worries about anything my kids might say about that last day. So I would tell the grandparents that I was innocent, and I would allow my kids to visit them.
Did you notice that in the very beginning, Michelles family supported and defended Dale? They publicly stated that a carjacker was the probable cause. But even then, Dale kept the kids away from them.
If a man throws a heavy object at his girlfriend, while she is holding his 15 month old baby, and he threatens the mother with further violence, with the kids looking on, is that not 'mistreating' the children?
The older brother also describes incidents where he saw his mom being hit by Dale. I call that child abuse. imo
I look at it this way. If I was the last one to see my partner, but I was innocent, then I would have no worries about anything my kids might say about that last day. So I would tell the grandparents that I was innocent, and I would allow my kids to visit them.
Did you notice that in the very beginning, Michelles family supported and defended Dale? They publicly stated that a carjacker was the probable cause. But even then, Dale kept the kids away from them.
Children belong with their parents not grandparents,
Bold By Me.
That is absolutely not necessarily true. I can't tell you how many children are in Kinship Foster Care due to the behavior of abusive parents, and yes exposing your children to domestic violence is considered child abuse. Things are not that black and white and if in fact, he is found to have killed their mother, do they still belong "with him?" Did Powell's kids "belong" with Josh? Or would they have been better off with their grandparents? Michelle's children were raised in that house with their mother and Yvonne. That was their home. Their lives have been totally torn apart. They must be devastated and it doesn't surprise me in the least that Yvonne reports that they look "blank."
there is no evidence that Dale is a "ticking time bomb" notwithstanding his previous record Dale was trying and succeeding in turning his life around.
Dale has an extremely violent and abusive past, especially toward the women in his life. Abuse is a pattern and escalates over time. He is a classic abuser! How much more writing needs to be on the wall? He threatened Michelle and told her that she would "get hers someday" which unfortunately it looks like she has, and since he and only he is the prime suspect, most likely at his hands. He also pushed and shoved a reporter on his way in to a court hearing that would ultimately ask a judge to find him a fit parent who was not dangerous or violent. This is a man that cannot control his anger when he is feeling threatened.He cannot even fake it! Obviously.
there is no evidence he ever mistreated or abused his children, as a matter of fact I would bet there is nobody in this thread who has first hand knowledge about the kind of relationship Dale has with his own children, please correct me if I am wrong.
Dale was holding their then-15-month-old daughter when he cursed at Michelle and broke the passenger-side window on her truck during an argument over the children.
Domestic violence in front of children is a form of child abuse. Period. And can be grounds for removal if it is chronic or severe.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...er-missing-dcf-20120124_1_children-dcf-mother
He is also keeping them from seeing their grandmother, who they lived with and who helped raise them, and who they love. How is that not emotionally abusive? I don't care what they are "saying" about him, his children should come first. They have already lost their mother. Dale doesn't seem to understand that its not all about him.
The family court, the only body to exam real evidence in order to determine the best interest of the children has place them with their father, and that is not speculation, theory or opinion is a matter of public records.
I agree with Jersey girl. There's too much speculating and emotional attachment going on as I also posted earlier.
katydid23, maybe dsjr does not want the twins to see michelle's family because he just doesn't want them to see each other? There are always multiple reasons something could be done- maybe even the most random, out of the blue, unlikely reason.
You can speculate that he doesn't want the twins to say anything. Maybe he just doesn't want them around michelle's family.
Twenty some odd years ago my parents were divorced. My mom always got a long with my dad's family. As soon as the divorce went through she cut off all contact and a few months later we moved to the other side of the state. Why did she do it who knows? Spite maybe. Maybe she thought they would try to influence me against her. Maybe dsjr thinks this also that michelle's family will try to make the twins reject him. At any rate my grandmother eventually had to sue for visitation.
Things are rarely if ever as black and white as y'all are trying to make out.
Is dsjr a bad guy? Yeah probably. He's definitely not someone I would try to be friends with, but constantly bashing him, calling him names, and letting your emotions take over with no proof is getting old.
I agree with Jersey girl. There's too much speculating and emotional attachment going on as I also posted earlier.
katydid23, maybe dsjr does not want the twins to see michelle's family because he just doesn't want them to see each other? There are always multiple reasons something could be done- maybe even the most random, out of the blue, unlikely reason.
You can speculate that he doesn't want the twins to say anything. Maybe he just doesn't want them around michelle's family.
Twenty some odd years ago my parents were divorced. My mom always got a long with my dad's family. As soon as the divorce went through she cut off all contact and a few months later we moved to the other side of the state. Why did she do it who knows? Spite maybe. Maybe she thought they would try to influence me against her. Maybe dsjr thinks this also that michelle's family will try to make the twins reject him. At any rate my grandmother eventually had to sue for visitation.
Things are rarely if ever as black and white as y'all are trying to make out.
Is dsjr a bad guy? Yeah probably. He's definitely not someone I would try to be friends with, but constantly bashing him, calling him names, and letting your emotions take over with no proof is getting old.
It is VERY difficult to remove children from the care of a biological parent, child welfare is all about reunification, and abuse has to be specific and severe for removal to occur, sometimes at the cost of the child. Just because a judge ruled that the kids stay with Dale does not mean they should actually be living with him or that they are safe. It means that-that is the call that the judge made with the evidence that he had. I work with Child Welfare all of the time, it does not operate the way that most people think it does. It is complex, frustrating and not at all black and white, and sometimes the courts hands are tied. You would be surprised.
BBM
Was that fair to you kids though? You were cut off from half of your family and from people that loved and cared about you. And it must have been sad for them as well.
That is what hurts me about this situation. Not only did the twins lose their mom, suddenly and with no explanation, but they lost the very family that had been raising them since birth.
They had a nice home with a mom and a big brother and a grandmother and an aunt. And then suddenly, ALL of those people who they were bonded with were gone. That is devastating, imo. And I really do not believe that Dale is a good enough substitute for that kind of a loss. he has a very short temper and is under a lot of stress. And I am sure the kids are whining about their mom, a lot.
Nope, it's definitely not fair. It sucks to be quite frank. But whose to say why he's doing this. If he's doing it bc he thinks he's being protective, then what? I'm totally at a loss.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.