
(3) A person who willfully, maliciously, and
repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person and makes a credible threat to that person commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s.
775.082, s.
775.083, or s.
775.084.
As you can see from the statute, aggravated stalking requires
repetition. I disagree she would be able to make that argument. And it is not her argument to make, it would be law enforcement's decision.
Again, following somebody home is not a crime. Standing in the roadway adjacent to their home is not a crime either. Heck, standing in somebody's yard against their wishes may be a crime, but not a serious enough crime to justify deadly force. That is why the justifiable force statute has the serious requirements it does.