Florida Bar Allegedly Prepares Case against Baez

[The World According]

Okay, where is TWA when I need her! Could it have been said during the August 21st hearing? This article is dated: April 5, 2010.

"Assistant State Attorney Linda Drane Burdick wants the transcripts for the two-hour hearing on Aug. 21, 2009. She doesn't explain in her one-page request filed Monday why the state seeks the information."


http://articles.orlandosentinel.com..._caylee-anthony-texas-equusearch-defense-team

The day JJ didn't show up.
http://www.wftv.com/video/23056801/index.html
(BTW this is the day the stream was messing up really bad. JB mentioned BC at about 27 min mark, but still have not heard him say that BC had docs in his possession comment. This is interesting to re-listen to.) bedtime: So will have to listen tomorrow unless the night shift finds the part while I dream!)

Here I am friend. I have never heard Jose Baez say that Brad had docs in his possession. In the depo, Brad was pretty ticked off, to put it politely and he made some statements, but I did not hear him say that. If he said that exactly in his depo, he could very well be talking about something that was said at sidebar or in chambers when they all were alone with the judge.

Jose complained early on about why was Brad being offered to look at the documents when the defense was not. Indeed Mark said in the hearing and Brad confirmed it in his depo that Mark offered up the records to Brad before ANYONE had reviewed them. That one part is true. The part Jose is wrong about is Brad was not allowed to look at them in any manner different than the State AND, and this part is important, nor was it in a manner different than Mark Nejame had offered to the defense. If you recall it wound up being scandalous how long those records sat there in Nejame's office, available to the defense and Jose never ever came to review them. Even when the info on the 32 was agreed he could have , he never came to pick those up. Mark wound up having them hand delivered to Baez. ON THOSE documents, at the top of one of the pages is JOE JORDAN's name.

That is something else they tried to misrepresent , they wanted to imply that TES, Mark, hid this very important name, and therefore likely others that were relevant. The state proved in a hearing that indeed they had his name all along. Then Jose tried to claim on his copy the name was cut off. Judge Strickland said, no, I can make the name out clearly.

We aren't to call names here, but I do not know a polite way to put it. Who knows what he said that we didn't overhear,all I know is the record is replete with examples of them fudging the truth that we did hear. If Mark Nejame walked out of a meeting and says Jose sat in there and told bold faced lies, I believe him.

THIS WAS PRICELESS MARK MOPPED THE FLOOR WITH THOSE MISREPRESENTATIONS.
[ame="http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=95625"]Nejame slaps down defense motion, asks for fees - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

Nejame slaps down defense motion, asks for fees
http://www.wftv.com/news/22535671/detail.html

The defense made knowingly false allegations about Mark to the judge regarding Mark having let a reporter review the TES documents. The reporter even called up Baez and said no sir, you have it wrong, I was only shown what has been released , the 32 . EVEN AFTER THAT, THE DEFENSE STILL WENT AHEAD WITH THEIR KNOWINGLY FALSE ALLEGATIONS. IT WAS RIDICULOUS!!!
The lawyer for TES expected that the defense would retract their accusation that he released the TES documents to the press. When they did not, he filed a motion with the court, responding to that and their requests for all of the documents. The very experienced Mr. Nejame, sets out the defense is out of line, and has their facts wrong. Again. I love Mark, he is basically saying here...I gave them a chance to take it back and they did not....so ...It's ON!!!!

He is asking for attorney fees ;because, this was BS for them to put that out in the public in bad faith. Even giving them the benefit of the doubt, that they misunderstood what went on with the journalist and the documents, when they were informed of what really happened....and still they did not retract it. Mark is waaaaay too experienced for them to try this against. One shouldn't accuse another lawyer of impropriety when they are not positive they can substantiate it.....especially when your own team members are under investigation!!!

Nejame asks the court to award TES attorney fees.
snip

"He has caused unnecessary attorney time and Court time to be wasted, especially since he has been fully advised of its misrepresentations and inaccuracies and nevertheless continues to proceed," NeJame wrote.

Baaaaam!

Defense Motion On NeJame
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/24581279/detail.html

NeJame To Defense | Response
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/24581670/detail.html

EMAILS: Cindy, Baez, Conway NeJame
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/24581702/detail.html

Do you remember when there was going to be a hearing on the bad faith of the defense team regarding TES? The judge pulled everyone up to the bench, for a long while, then the hearing never happened in open court. The judge did tell Mark Nejame he could bring up the bad faith at a later time. The parties all met in chambers and reached an agreement on how the TES records were going to be reviewed and the stipulations order emerged.

I believe for the reasons he had then and the new reasons the complaint could have been made by Mark. I know he had his ducks in a row when he walked into the hearing I am speaking of. He knows how to prepare a legal document. If the complaint is from him, I concur with our member upthread that said something to the effect of ut oh for Mr. Baez. If as and when Mark Nejame decides the proper forum to handle Baez is the Florida bar.....it will be very comprehensive manner, I trust.

[ame="http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=97090"]All Texas Equusearch-Related Filings #1 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

[ame="http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114533"]2010.09.16 Tim Miller on Issues with Jane Velez Mitchel - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

Certainly they made misrepresentations about the experts. WOW! http://websleuths.com/forums/blog.php?b=884
...about the experts being invited to view the evidence http://websleuths.com/forums/blog.php?b=764

Certainly they did about the proof and 100 witnesses they had.Repeatedly!

I know the defense made misrepresentations to the judge about just finding out mom and pop filled out questionnaires about Casey for the federal agents. Mrs Drane Burdick stood up and told the judge, not only is that not true, but IN THE DEPO Jose commented on having seen that mentioned in the video of the FBI interviews.

Also, there was the little gem about mom's co workers. http://websleuths.com/forums/blog.php?b=763

Yes, there have been several "misrepresentations". Please don't make me list them all. To answer your question what was Mark referring to saying Baez lied....take your pick.

 

[Sherbie]

Given the proximity of this latest complaint to the last document dump, it would be a good guess that whatever was filed with the Bar was related to the issues revealed in there. Now don't forget there is another wronged party in all of JB's shenanigans, TES themselves. TES and MN may not have known the full extent of the unethical behavior until they saw BC's interview. The complaint may be coming from that direction? Remember JB was not making the misrepresentations of BC in order to argue against BC. he was lying in order to win a motion against MN and TES.

Excellent analysis, faefrost -- makes perfect sense! Two other scenarios I'm mulling:

1. LE turned over to the SA's office all the investigative info regarding tampering and lying to the court, and perhaps someone in the SA's office made the complaint.
2. The judge reviewed the discovery and made the complaint himself.

Heck, depending on what all the SA's office received from LE in regard to that investigation (we've seen only what was released as discovery in this case), I wonder if he might even face some sort of charges eventually.

I certainly hope he went no further than what we're aware of -- I am concerned his subterfuge and chicanery might cause a mistrial.

 

[Sherbie]

TWA, thank you for that excellent post and the reminders therein! I wonder if there is some rule or court order that BC wasn't allowed to review, touch, make notes, etc., simply because the defense wasn't allowed to do certain things. Wouldn't TES have the right to let anyone they want inspect their records in any way they see fit? I never did quite understand the defense's whining over that issue.

 

[kaRN]

This recent incident of Conway claiming that Baez lied to the Court is not the first time Conway has said that Baez lied to the Court.
The first time was when Conway resigned over it - Baez lied about the Anthony's waiver of conflict and other things in that regard.
In the latest incident Conway claims that Baez lied to the Court about Conway having information about information in the TES documents that is exculpatory.
IMO Conway should have filed a Bar complaint the first time he had evidence of Baez lying to the Court.

Whoever filed the latest Bar complaint could have filed a complaint regarding the tampering investigation, and not about Conway's accusations of Baez lying to the Court?

The public will not know who filed the latest Bar complaint, or what the complaint is based on, until after the case has been investigated by the Bar, and either closed, or action taken.

I'm starting to wonder if it wasn't filed by CA and GA as a trial delay tactic and that's why in the article, the contact from the Bar said there was no probable cause determined yet. I'd think a complaint from a lawyer or judge might be escalated and not be still with staff. Unless it was filed and the media immediately alerted in which case it's definately CA and GA lol and IMO!

 

[The World According]

The Florida bar itself has the right to open an investigation if a situation should warrant it. Wouldn't that be HUGE?

I know there are more than one TES volunteer that certainly believe misrepresentations were made to the court about the nature of the limited questions they were to be asked. We learned here that the questions went wll beyond those stipulated to.

I bet Mr. Nejame's office was flooded with calls complaining about Jeremy Lyons, starting with the two Bretts. I bet all the money in my pockets this news of the complaint will inspire others to make them, especially if it turns out to be from a non lawyer and it is brought to the attention of the public that anyone can file a complaint.

If I were Joe Jordan and having to pay my second lawyer, I'd sure be pissed off. Misrepresentations regarding him were certainly made in legal documents and in oral arguments to the court.

Brad tells us Joe's lawyer informed him Joe Jordan if called to the stand would say I was NOT in that exact area, and the area was under water. That is the utter and complete opposite of what the defense alleged IN LEGAL documents that he and Laura could help substantiate.
That was a misrepresentation to the court, alright, of biblical proportions. If it wasn't Brad, my money is on Joe Jordan and or Mark Nejame.

Even so, the defense better pray to GOD it is something like that and not that they misrepresented to the court that they would guard and protect the care custody and control over those autopsy photos....and then Mort showed them to potential witnesses. The outrage and backlash over that would be tough to measure. It would be career suicide. The detectives asking Brad and Kelly Sims questions about the photos, if Mort showed them or described them tell me that is precisely what is depicted on the audio tape of the Joe Jordan meeting with Mort. There is no other inference one could draw.
MOO

Balloon down for Mort. That's certain.

 

[zoey]

Nancy Grace is an attorney and many of her guests are also attorneys, so I suspect that they don't want to be put in a position of making comments on another attorney's ethics or courtroom manners.

ahhhhhhh, but Nancy has no problem doing that....(at least if they are atty's and her guests--one could take it one step further as to court room:fence

 

[Tulessa]

Just speculating here. Is it possible that BC went to HHJP and HHJP filed the complaint against Baez?

 

[QB.]

Anybody know the date of the Hearing where NeJame was in the courtroom, and Conway was there too, and Baez made the claims that Conway was aware of information in TES documents that would corroborate the Defense claim that Caylee's body was put there while Inmate Casey was in jail?

So far I haven't seen an answer to this question. Does anyone know the hearing where this allegedly happened?
I have viewed the 04/05/10 hearing again and BC was not present for this.
I'm assuming it would have happened at hearing where BC was present.

 

[LiveLaughLuv]

It was bound to happen...he's been treading on thin ice since forever...:maddening:

I'm not that judical saavy but I do know a duck when I see/hear one.

It appears to me, Baez will use any trick to try and offer up innocence pertaining to this crime on Caylee...even as the evidence doesn't coincide with what he states, I thought he was trying for muddying the waters but he has stepped over that line, way tooooo much..I hope he's not trying for a mistrial for it appears he might not be an attorney for long, or no one will hire him to help fight a traffic ticket..All for what/who? This prisoner??? Will he just blame the PI?

Self preservation is the most common of human emotions, second to anger and rage..will he be able to double talk his way out of this?

I wonder how his co-counsel CM feels about this investigation. He was livid when sanctions were placed on Baez stateing in his 40 years he has never missed a deadline or ever been held in contempt of court..well, that streak is over.

According to BS, this allegation is second to stealing a clients money, it's huge for this makes JB loose credibility, even worse for now His Honor can not take what he states to him as gospel truth, now everything Baez states will come under scrutiny...he did it to himself. I do hope he doesn't use the phrase, I am an officer of the court, for he has misrepresented from the get go...

He's being called over zealous in how he's defending ICA but it truly feels as if Caylee's life didn't matter (to him and his client), he's trying to make ICA the victim here and that will not fly. The State prosecutors will keep Caylee's name front and center and the harder Baez pushes, she is innocent of this crime, he can't back that up, no how, no way...the state will see to it that Caylee gets justice. He's floated so many scenarios out there it's become second nature to him to "misrepresent"! Another term for bold faced lies. Just as we heard from this prisoners parents, (half truths, mistruths) seems to be a theme with this folks...

I am so curious as to who filed this complaint! Or is it that the Florida Bar Association is watching him very closely for this isn't the first greivance put forth about him...he might also feel like he is made of teflon, nothing will stick, for he's gotten out of this before...I wonder what this will do for this trial? He also doesn't feel humiliation or embarassment, IMO...he just smirks away as usual...

What will His Honor do to preserve this trial with all the time and money already put into it...just a few short months before May 2011...JMHO

Justice for Caylee

 

[Novice Seeker]

Geesh, don't any of you ever sleep?

Came across this but it wouldn't let me copy anything other than the web site. It seems that a judgement was made against the Baez Law Firm in early 2008? Just thought it interesting given that the bar is investigating him, again. Also, wasn't one of the findings the Fl. Bar asserted in denying his admittance was JB's financial records?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/10294232/Casey-Anthonys-attorney-has-to-pay-out

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68212901/FLORIDA-BOARD-OF-BAR-EXAMINERS-RE-Jose-Baez

Novice Seeker

 

[LiveLaughLuv]

Originally Posted by QB.
So far I haven't seen an answer to this question. Does anyone know the hearing where this allegedly happened?
I have viewed the 04/05/10 hearing again and BC was not present for this.
I'm assuming it would have happened at hearing where BC was present.

I'm wondering if after these depositions with LBuchanan, JJ, APham...would/could LE put in that grievance or the prosecution?

It doesn't necessarily have to be from one of the pretrial hearings does it? JMHO

Justice for Caylee

 

[QB.]

Sorry, the lines blur and cross over for me with this latest fiasco.
I will delete my posts if I can

 

[Aedrys]

You know, something just occurred to me. When Baez whined about Conway getting to see the documents first, was he setting up Conway as the person who had LB's document first? I can totally see him doing that. I'm starting to wonder what would have happened had TES not doggedly responded that Conway had the same access, and if Conway hadn't resigned. I'm wondering if he wouldn't have accused Conway of tampering with the TES records and placing LB's document there when the sh** hit the fan about her lying and forging a document. She was practically stalking the A's, so it's easy to to see that he would have said or implied that the document came from the A's, who then passed it on to their lawyer, who put it in the TES documents when he saw them first. Wow, did Conway dodge a bullet or what?

The other thing is that Todd Macaluso's words just seem to haunt this defense team. Why did he say there was actual evidence that Caylee's body wasn't there? And why has Baez not been able to get past that statement? All he has done is try to bring forward evidence to exonerate Casey and failed time and again. You'd think he'd try to find a new strategy instead of making the defense team strapped to TM's words. Something was going on there behind the scenes for TM to say that. And things have totally fallen apart for the defense team since then. Maybe Baez promised Casey there was evidence, so he's had to look like he's trying to find it for her? I don't know. He's gone way too far, and I hope this latest bar complaint pans out and he loses his license. Why her, Baez? Why lose everything for a sociopathic baby killer?

Any may I say, tomorrow's hearing should be a doozy.

 

[LiveLaughLuv]

Geesh, don't any of you ever sleep?

Came across this but it wouldn't let me copy anything other than the web site. It seems that a judgement was made against the Baez Law Firm in early 2008? Just thought it interesting given that the bar is investigating him, again. Also, wasn't one of the findings the Fl. Bar asserted in denying his admittance was JB's financial records?

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/10294232/Casey-Anthonys-attorney-has-to-pay-out

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68212901/FLORIDA-BOARD-OF-BAR-EXAMINERS-RE-Jose-Baez

Novice Seeker

Hey Novice, I ask the same thing all the time..seems I'm always a day late and a dollar short...:floorlaugh:

I do believe that is what held Baez back those eight long years. The Florida Bar thought he was unethical, owed money out..he had to make good before they allowed him to practice law...

I've stated it many times before, Baez still hasn't learned a thing...JMHO

Justice for Caylee

For eight years after he graduated from law school, however, the board that screens prospective attorneys in Florida would not let him practice law. The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the decision, issuing an order in 2000 that cataloged unpaid bills, extravagant spending and other "financial irresponsibility" up to that time. Justices reserved their strongest condemnation for his failure to stay current on support payments for his only child.

His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law."

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/topic/

OS had done a two part series on JB...it's not there anymore, but I did post it elsewhere and have it memorialized in print...:

 

[Intermezzo]

So far I haven't seen an answer to this question. Does anyone know the hearing where this allegedly happened?
I have viewed the 04/05/10 hearing again and BC was not present for this.
I'm assuming it would have happened at hearing where BC was present.

I deleted my previous post so not to confuse the matter...
I will look for that hearing as well...
----------------------
Cindy and George "rescinded" waiver of conflict of interest (that Brad did not know of until Nejame emailed to him, was dated February 12, 2010

August 9 2010 Defense filed a motion that Brad Conway said contains allegations involving him that are not in fact true.

Brad resigned August 16 2010

 

[The World According]

I am not positive, but as certain as one can be, a literal sentence that Brad had documents in his possession or evidence in his possession was not made in open court on the record, save and except at side bar that we were not privy to. This allegation may have been made at side bar or in one of the meetings the state, defense and Mark had with the judge. I have searched high and I have searched low. I believe it absolutely could have been said, just not on the public record.

Todd, Andrea and Jose have all said in open court on the record that they allege a conflict of interest with Mark representing mom and pop and now TES. Each time they did that, Brad corrected the record, and informed the judge, NO that is incorrect. Those hearings we have posted many times.

If Baez had made a comment on the record that Brad had documents or evidence in his possession.....................even WESH would have had to report that.

 

[Tulessa]

I deleted my previous post so not to confuse the matter...
I will look for that hearing as well...
----------------------
Cindy and George "rescinded" waiver of conflict of interest (that Brad did not know of until Nejame emailed to him, was dated February 12, 2010

August 9 2010 Defense filed a motion that Brad Conway said contains allegations involving him that are not in fact true.

Brad resigned August 16 2010

So he was fessing up in August that these were false.......

 

[The World According]

One of our brilliant members, Gia , was helping us the other night with something. Reading that again, brought to my mind, it could be one of the experts who is wholly offended at what Jose misrepresents to the court about them, what they may or may not have said or given him. We know he has been less than forthcoming on the matter of the experts, and in the words of Mark Nejame, "I am being overly generous in my characterization!"

[ame="http://websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6022559&postcount=104"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - 2011.01.11 Info RE: Caylee's Second Autopsy[/ame]
http://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=h...=9b-Qh75GVe3dJdRHyrhJrubqbnB8MTI5NjgzMDE4Mw==
Originally Posted by The World According View Post
Gaia, it is always good to see you on the board. This is exactly what I thought, only you put it much more politely than I. As soon as I read the hogwash...Dr. Spitz is shocked that Dr. G. did not do x y or z, I thought, the representations the defense are making are guess what.....not direct quotes from the expert. I find the take the defense has on things may as well be PigLatin!!!

Indeed the experts are likely sitting there with their mouths hung open reading the spin the lawyer put on what they talked about, shocked; because, it is very, very far removed from what they said. The inferences Baez and Mason draw from conversations are likely, no where near the intent. This is why having the reports from the actual experts is imperative. We know that Baez and Mason can leave a hearing and in the two minute walk out to the courthouse steps, get it all wrong....opine to reporters nearly opposite of what the judge just now ruled. (At the fraud hearing, part of the ruling, no contact with Amy, ever. Baez says to reporters, regarding Amy..Casey would love to hear from her, if she is watching today...Casey has missed her friend, would love a letter from her.... praphrased. WTH? That is just one of a million examples.)

I am sure that Dr. Spitz is not nearly as confused about these matters as Jose and Cheney are. I am sure that when he testifies he will have no such criticism of Dr. G., and certainly none that will survive questions one through five on redirect from Mr. Ashton. Jeff Ashton will mop the floor with that if he does adopt any nonsense.

I would venture to guess that much like how thoroughly ticked off Terry L. was about his disagreements with Jose, many, many of the experts have come to have a considerable disdain for these particular defense lawyers and are NOT about to say or do anything to embarass themselves professionally in order to appease them. That is the problem with trying this case ten minutes at a time....putting things out there in the media on someone else's behalf. Folks don't take kindly to someone else putting words in their mouth, especially far reaching things that one would never say, that make no sense whatsoever. Volunteering to help pro bono is one thing, having someone put words in your mouth and taint your professional reputation is quite another. I imagine Jose has and will receive more than one don't you dare ever attach my name to any more of your asenine statements again, phone calls.

This reminds me of
Jose,
Todd and
Andrea
all, in different hearings, saying on the record that there is a conflict of interest for Mark Nejame to have once worked with mom and pop and now representing TES. At all three hearings, Brad, to his credit, literally
shook his head NO,
rolled his wheelchair up front,
got Judge Strickland's attention
and said no, that is not correct, the Anthonys are not asserting any such thing, indeed they have signed a waiver of conflict of interest for Mr. Nejame.


After the defense being shown to be lying or wrong the first time, one would think they would never bring up that false claim again, but alas they did, not only one more time, or two more times.....but it culminated in Brad literally resigning over it the very last time ( mom and pop tried to write that ridiculous letter, and Brad said.....no...that is just not true and I will NOT go along with that ...hmmmmm...misreprentation).

Bottom line is like you say Gia.....just because the defense lawyer claims that is the expert's position is no, literally zero indication ...that is what the expert will testify to at all.

The way, the very best way to predict someone's future behavior is by their past behavior, so I say this with conviction......I just do not take a thing they say as correct or true. Even if they were trying to be completely forthright, the evidence has shown, repeeatedly, that they often have a very poor understanding...so either by accident or design, anything they claim their experts will say is in my estimation wrong.

You must keep in mind, this is the crew that had Todd stading in open court claiming they had witnesses who will prove that the baby's little skeleton was put there after Casey was jailed. We later learned these would be witnesses were non other than Laura and Joe and how fast that blew up in their faces.
Coming from the folks who thought Jill Kerley would save the day....... you just can't make this stuff up.


We also have to keep in mind this is the defense team that
tried to have the prosecutors removed from the case
asked Judge Strickland to step aside
tried to say Jesse and Amy are suspects
tried to say Kronk should be a suspect
tried to maniplate both Bret's ( TES searchers ) to the point where they contacted LE over it,
tried to present Laura's testimony and document as legit
tried to say mom made up her seeming shock on the 911 call.....
tried to hand in a check with a wink and say but don't cash it.....
tried to explain the reason their docs due at noon were late was because of five o clock traffic......

for goodness sake ...is anyone surprised that they would put a spin on what they thought their expert meant?


Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - 2010.10.20 - PI Lyons Accused of Witness Tampering


You can make this stuff up if you are going to sign your name as one of the lawyers for Casey Marie Anthony.

Brad Conway On The Today Show detailing the false representations that the defense made about him to the court are why he resigned
http://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=h...=9b-Qh75GVe3dJdRHyrhJrubqbnB8MTI5NjgzMDE4Mw==


Brad Conway Resignation Letter
http://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=h...=9b-Qh75GVe3dJdRHyrhJrubqbnB8MTI5NjgzMDE4Mw==
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTGZmJeOSQ8[/ame]

here it is...Brad said the defense filed false and misleading pleadings

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlmGd15FEiQ[/ame]

I trust we are simply seeing more of the same in this case.

__________________
I have a constitutional right to my opinion and I am stating it!!!!!

 

[QB.]

I am not positive, but as certain as one can be, a literal sentence that Brad had documents in his possession or evidence in his possession was not made in open court on the record, save and except at side bar that we were not privy to. This allegation may have been made at side bar or in one of the meetings the state, defense and Mark had with the judge. I have searched high and I have searched low. I believe it absolutely could have been said, just not on the public record.

Todd, Andrea and Jose have all said in open court on the record that they allege a conflict of interest with Mark representing mom and pop and now TES. Each time they did that, Brad corrected the record, and informed the judge, NO that is incorrect. Those hearings we have posted many times.

If Baez had made a comment on the record that Brad had documents or evidence in his possession.....................even WESH would have had to report that.

Puzzling isn't it?! If the comments were made at a sidebar wouldn't BC had to have been included in that sidebar as well, otherwise how would he know about it?

 

[ThinkTank]

I am not positive, but as certain as one can be, a literal sentence that Brad had documents in his possession or evidence in his possession was not made in open court on the record, save and except at side bar that we were not privy to. This allegation may have been made at side bar or in one of the meetings the state, defense and Mark had with the judge. I have searched high and I have searched low. I believe it absolutely could have been said, just not on the public record.

Todd, Andrea and Jose have all said in open court on the record that they allege a conflict of interest with Mark representing mom and pop and now TES. Each time they did that, Brad corrected the record, and informed the judge, NO that is incorrect. Those hearings we have posted many times.

If Baez had made a comment on the record that Brad had documents or evidence in his possession.....................even WESH would have had to report that.

I think the word "possession" is the problem.
Conway did not use that word in his LE Interview.
Conway said that Baez told the Judge that Conway "had information" about information in the TES documents that would be exculpatory. Or that Conway knew about such records/documents.
So, IMO, we would not be listening for Baez to say that Conway had documents "in his possession" .... rather that Conway "had information" about documents in TES records that would support the claim that Caylee's body was placed there when Inmate Anthony was in jail. It would most likely be a brief statement that many did not catch, but Conway heard it because it was about himself.

On IS, they are saying that parts of the April 5, 2010 Hearing video have been redacted. May be why nobody can find that reference that Conway spoke of to LE?