GA - Former President Donald Trump indicted, 10 counts in 2020 election interference, violation of RICO Act, 14 Aug 2023

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #321
  • #322
Do we know if some are supposed to arrive today? Or is this just general prep in case someone does show up?

I think it's just general prep, haven't heard anything yet about anyone indicted showing up. However I did just post that apparently Chesebro's attorney is trying to contact the DA's office to coordinate Chesebro coming in:
 
  • #323
  • #324
  • #325
Moving right along with the GA Indictment.

Count 1: Violation of GA RICO Act
All 19 defendants are charged with this count. There are 161 acts under this count, and I am going through them one by one.

Any bolding is by me.

57. Dec 11, 2020: David Shafer (GA GOP Chair) reserved Room 216 at Georgia State Capitol in Fulton County for the Dec 14 meeting of Trump elector nominees.

58. Dec 11, 2020: Kenneth Chesebro (Trump lawyer) emailed Jim DeGraffenreid (Nevada GOP), "the purpose of having electoral votes sent to Congress is to provide the opportunity to debate the election irregularities in Congress and to keep alive the possibility that the votes could be flipped to Trump."

59. Dec 11, 2020: Kenneth Chesebro (Trump lawyer) emailed documents to Greg Safsten (Arizona GOP) and others. Arizona Trump elector nominees were to use the documents to cast electoral votes for Trump despite the fact Trump lost the election in Arizona.

60. Dec 11, 2020: Kenneth Chesebro (Trump lawyer) emailed documents to Michael Roman (Trump campaign official) and others from the campaign. Trump elector nominees in Nevada were to use the documents to cast electoral votes for Trump despite the fact Trump lost the election in Nevada.

61. Dec 11, 2020: Kenneth Chesbro (Trump lawyer) emailed documents to Michael Roman (Trump campaign official), unindicted co-conspirator #5, and others. Trump elector nominees in Georgia were to use the documents to cast electoral votes for Trump despite the fact Trump lost the election in Georgia.

Reminder: Elector nominees do not have the right to cast electoral votes for president. There is no such thing as "just in case we need them" voting or a dual set of votes.

to be continued...

Source: Georgia Indictment, page 35
 
  • #326
Former hard core Republican here. Was a member of my university's College Republicans. Campaigned for Republican candidates all four years. I stopped being a Republican the day Trump won the 2016 nomination because the GOP stopped being my father's GOP. I like to call it "Political Hypocrisy 101". Suddenly everything Republican politicians would blast their Democratic counterparts for they defended in Trump.

In 2008, Republicans (rightfully, in my opinion), slammed the cult-like following voters had regarding Obama. What's occurred with the slavish adoration of Trump has far surpassed that.

The "First Amendment defense" on his crimes is a joke. It's been well established he knew the truth.

And, for the record, if Biden is found guilty of committing any crimes, I fully support his indictment because my loyalty remains with the republic (if we can keep it) and not a man.
I appreciate your honesty. I agree strongly that our loyalty should be to our country
And not to a man. Too bad Republican leadership is unable to get there
 
  • #327
Trump didn't ask anyone to commit a crime. He truly believed election fraud had been committed in multiple states and members of my own family who voted for him believed it.

Georgia has charged Trump and other defendants for tweets and phone calls asking for phone numbers and for tweets that encouraged his supporters to watch election hearings being televised. Last I checked, Freedom of Speech is still a protected right.

The GA Indictment is one of the most laughably absurd documents I've ever read. The fact that Trump's indictment was published prior to the Grand Jury even voting just proves how low the DA is willing to go.

JMO

This sounds like a crime to me IMO
Trump asked Raffensperger to "find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won this state."
 
  • #328
  • #329
Continued....GA Indictment read-a-long.

Count 1: Violation of Georgia RICO ACT
All 19 defendants are charged with this count. There are 161 acts under the count, and I'm going through them.

Any bolding is by me.

As we approach Dec 14 in the indictment, I double-checked my knowledge about the Electoral College voting with the National Archives:

"The meeting of the electors takes place on the first Tuesday after the second Wednesday in December after the general election. The electors meet in their respective States, where they cast their votes for President and Vice President on separate ballots. Your State’s electors’ votes are recorded on a Certificate of Vote, which is prepared at the meeting by the electors. Your State’s Certificate of Vote is sent to Congress, where the votes are counted, and to NARA, as part of the official records of the Presidential election." Source linked below.

You see in the indictment that fake electors were instructed to copy the official procedures in their actions, but the fake electors were not official. They were fake.

62. Dec 12, 2020: David Shafer (Georgia GOP Chair) contacted unindicted co-conspirator #12 and discussed #12's attendance at Dec 14 meeting of Trump elector nominees.

63. Dec 12, 2020: Michael Roman (Trump campaign official) emailed unindicted co-conspirators #4 and #7 and others with the campaign. Roman stated, "I need a tracker for the electors" and told individuals to record on a spreadsheet Trump elector nominees in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The spreadsheet included contact info for elector nominees, if they had been contacted, confirmation they would attend Dec 14 elector meeting in their states, despite the fact Trump lost the election in those states.

64. Dec 12, 2020: Kenneth Chesebro (Trump lawyer) met with Brian Schimming (Wisconsin GOP) and discussed Dec 14 meeting of Trump elector nominees in Wisconsin. Rudy joined via phone and stated media should not be notified of Dec 14 Trump elector nominees meeting in Wisconsin.

65. Dec 12, 2020: Michael Roman (Trump campaign official) instructed an individual in the campaign to distribute information regarding Dec 14 meeting of Trump elector nominees in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin to unindicted co-conspirator #4 and others in the campaign.

66. Dec 12, 2020: Unindicted co-conspirator #4 emailed Michael Roman (Trump campaign official) and David Shafer (GA GOP) regarding Dec 14 meeting of Trump elector nominees in Fulton County, Georgia. The email listed confirmed attendees and back-ups had been secured if some nominees refused to participate. Georgia legislators had been contacted to ensure access to the Georgia State Capitol and that James Shafer has reserved Room 216.

67. Dec 12, 2020: David Shafter (GA GOP) emailed unindicated co-conspirator #4 requesting #4 "touch base" with each Trump elector nominee in Georgia before Dec 14 meeting to confirm attendance.

68. Dec 12, 2020: Unindicted co-conspirator #4 texted contact info for unindicted co-conspirator #8 and Georgia Senator Brandon Beach to Michael Roman (Trump campaign official) for him to provide to Rudy.


Source: Georgia Indictment, pages 35-37

National Archives page about Electoral College: What is the Electoral College?.
 
  • #330
If it was a crime, why didn't Raffensperger have Trump arrested nearly 3 years ago when Trump asked him to investigate?

JMO
Because "have the President of the US arrested" is not the same as calling the cops to report a burglary?

I mean, why not ask the same question of Pence, who seemed to want to keep Trump (and himself) in office if he had a legal way to do so, but did enough research to know he couldn't legally do what Trump had asked about pausing/interrupting/whatever the electoral vote count on 1/6. Once he knew it was illegal and he was going to decline to participate, why didn't HE "have the president arrested?"

Or anyone else in DJT's orbit who saw him do stuff they knew to be illegal. Why didn't they act? Partly because they follow him blindly. Partly because they are (possibly, presumably not everyone) equally open to cheating for their own benefit?

Maybe also because Trump built his whole empire on breaking rules and then telling people they approved, and for the same inexplicable reason, people responded positively to his strategy.

Telling people he could shoot someone on the street and not lose voters wasn't a brag about his popularity, it was an *instruction* to people, which they followed, as if hypnotized! o_O o_O

MOO
 
  • #331
@jimsciutto

Breaking: Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has asked a judge to set a trial date of March 4, 2024, for former President Donald Trump and his 18 co-defendants.

@bluestein

Willis’ proposed schedule also requests arraignments for Trump and his allies the week of Sept. 5. She hasn’t changed her Aug. 25 deadline for them to surrender at the Fulton County Jail.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0184.jpeg
    IMG_0184.jpeg
    92.1 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_0186.jpeg
    IMG_0186.jpeg
    105.8 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_0185.jpeg
    IMG_0185.jpeg
    59.2 KB · Views: 7
  • #332
Because "have the President of the US arrested" is not the same as calling the cops to report a burglary?

I mean, why not ask the same question of Pence, who seemed to want to keep Trump (and himself) in office if he had a legal way to do so, but did enough research to know he couldn't legally do what Trump had asked about pausing/interrupting/whatever the electoral vote count on 1/6. Once he knew it was illegal and he was going to decline to participate, why didn't HE "have the president arrested?"

Or anyone else in DJT's orbit who saw him do stuff they knew to be illegal. Why didn't they act? Partly because they follow him blindly. Partly because they are (possibly, presumably not everyone) equally open to cheating for their own benefit?

Maybe also because Trump built his whole empire on breaking rules and then telling people they approved, and for the same inexplicable reason, people responded positively to his strategy.

Telling people he could shoot someone on the street and not lose voters wasn't a brag about his popularity, it was an *instruction* to people, which they followed, as if hypnotized! o_O o_O

MOO
And Trump destroys people who defy him. Let's not underestimate the fear factor. imo

jmo
 
  • #333
@jimsciutto

Breaking: Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has asked a judge to set a trial date of March 4, 2024, for former President Donald Trump and his 18 co-defendants.

@bluestein

Willis’ proposed schedule also requests arraignments for Trump and his allies the week of Sept. 5. She hasn’t changed her Aug. 25 deadline for them to surrender at the Fulton County Jail.
Trying to move quickly, but realistically I don't see it happening in March. Late summer at the very earliest, because there are going to be a million delays and requests to continue, LOA requests, etc...
I would be very happy if this date holds firm, though!
IMO
 
  • #334
If it wasn't a crime, there wouldn't be an indictment! It's literally one of the overt acts.

It is ridiculous to keep debating this. He has been charged for making that phone call (Solicitation of Violation of Oath By A Public Officer) because it is an overt act IN FURTHERANCE of a conspiracy (Page 48, Act 112) - also known as a crime.
 
  • #335
“These jurors have signed their death warrant by falsely indicting President Trump," read one post on a pro-Trump forum in response to a post including the names of jurors, which was viewed by NBC News.

 
  • #336
“These jurors have signed their death warrant by falsely indicting President Trump," read one post on a pro-Trump forum in response to a post including the names of jurors, which was viewed by NBC News.

And this is how people get hurt and killed.
Deplorable.
 
  • #337
If it wasn't a crime, there wouldn't be an indictment! It's literally one of the overt acts.

It is ridiculous to keep debating this. He has been charged for making that phone call (Solicitation of Violation of Oath By A Public Officer) because it is an overt act IN FURTHERANCE of a conspiracy (Page 48, Act 112) - also known as a crime.
So true. People defending the "perfect phone call" know far more than an educated, experienced DA prosecuting a high-profile case that the whole world is watching. Oops, she flubbed up. I guess she should've read comment sections on the internet to learn something.

jmo
 
  • #338
And Trump destroys people who defy him. Let's not underestimate the fear factor. imo

jmo
Read ‘the MOST DANGEROUS MAN by his niece Mary Trump. She warned us! No one listened. MOO
 
  • #339
“These jurors have signed their death warrant by falsely indicting President Trump," read one post on a pro-Trump forum in response to a post including the names of jurors, which was viewed by NBC News.

Disgusting and horrifying.
 
  • #340
If it was a crime, why didn't Raffensperger have Trump arrested nearly 3 years ago when Trump asked him to investigate?

JMO
It was a crime and is listed as such in the indictments
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
124
Guests online
2,699
Total visitors
2,823

Forum statistics

Threads
632,151
Messages
18,622,696
Members
243,034
Latest member
RepresentingTheLBC
Back
Top