I don't think he looked crazy at all in his pictures. I would be very shocked to think he had done what he had done just by looking at this pictures. That's not what registered. But he should not have been given access to fire arms because you could see he had developmental issues that made him not responsible enough to be given that level of responsibility.
I also agree that a bad picture can give someone a wrong impression. Just like a good picture can give someone a better countenance than they really have.
One of my sisters takes absolutely fantastic pictures but in person is horrid. So I'm not saying pictures always tell the story. They don't.
But I look people in the face and eyes all the time because I rely on lip reading. When you do that all the time you just notice things that others don't notice. But I'm mindful of preconceptions and stereotypes that I might have. :blushing:
So do I, but looking at a living, mobile face with a whole host of micro-expressions people aren't aware they are making during face-to-face interaction is different to looking at a static, flat, motionless photographic image.