General Discussion and Theories #2

[swedie]

Whatever SB decides to do with all those generous donations in no ones business but her own. She is such a kind, generous and beautiful soul, she has decided to help others and bring total awareness of her intent through MSM by starting the trust fund in honour of Tim.

I hope she also files a wrongful death suit against the accused if they are found guilty and uses the money to secure the future of hers and Tim's daughter. I guess if DM has no big wealth, as some assume, SB cannot get blood from a stone. So be it. Certainly his assets would have been frozen and any money (if he has any), would pay off his legal expenses. As in the R Williams case, RW was trying to protect/cover up his assets by signing over property and accounts to his wife. If DM is trying to do the same thing via his mother, it won't work. The government will see to it, if SB does file a wrongful death suit, she will be entitled to that money (again, if there is any to be had). As for MS, well that's another story. I guess there is the possibilty he could have a hefty bank account. Maybe from the proceeds of crime JHO.

Here's hoping the donations, possible life insurance and possible money from a wrongful death suit will see to it that she is able to have some financial security now that she has lost her loving husband; the financial support he would have provided for his family over the remainder of their lives. The best we can hope for is, people will continue to be generous in their donations and support (including emotional support) to SB and wee one through Tim's Tribute fund, for many years to come. All the best to SB and your little girl. MOO

 

[Blomquist]

Whatever SB decides to do with all those generous donations in no ones business but her own. She is such a kind, generous and beautiful soul, she has decided to help others and bring total awareness of her intent through MSM by starting the trust fund in honour of Tim.

I must assume you know her personally Swedie. Of course the donations were very generous. I think people have been donating with good kind hearts. Of course SB will do as she wishes with the donations. They were donated for her and her child so why wouldn't she ?

I hope she also files a wrongful death suit against the accused if they are found guilty and uses the money to secure the future of hers and Tim's daughter.

Thats rather premature IMO. Once we know who is responsible for the crime then I agree a lawsuit could be in order...and maybe she will do just that.


I guess if DM has no big wealth, as some assume, SB cannot get blood from a stone. So be it. Certainly his assets would have been frozen and any money (if he has any), would pay off his legal expenses.

Thats assuming that DM is guilty of course. What makes you think his assets would be frozen? Especially if they are incorporated I doubt it JMO

As in the R Williams case, RW was trying to protect/cover up his assets by signing over property and accounts to his wife. If DM is trying to do the same thing via his mother, it won't work. The government will see to it, if SB does file a wrongful death suit, she will be entitled to that money (again, if there is any to be had). As for MS, well that's another story. I guess there is the possibilty he could have a hefty bank account. Maybe from the proceeds of crime JHO.


She will only be entitled to the amount determined.... IF he is the guilty party... So I guess MS will not be sued because he may not have wealth.??
Maybe SB is not obsessed with money and feels she does not need to be in court for years trying to extract more money.... I think she will want some peace and quiet after all this media frenzy...not bring on another lot to cause her to have sleepless nights and less time with her daughter. JMO



Here's hoping the donations, possible life insurance and possible money from a wrongful death suit will see to it that she is able to have some financial security now that she has lost her loving husband; the financial support he would have provided for his family over the remainder of their lives. The best we can hope for is, people will continue to be generous in their donations and support (including emotional support) to SB and wee one through Tim's Tribute fund, for many years to come. All the best to SB and your little girl. MOO

Yes.. I just wish all the other children that lose a daddy could also benefit in such a way.... maybe some kind of foundation can be created to accept donations for all families who have lost and who are in need... that would be a wonderful thing IMO

purple responses

 

[Sillybilly]

from:
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9786152&postcount=744"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - General Discussion and Theories #2[/ame]

She will only be entitled to the amount determined.... IF he is the guilty party... So I guess MS will not be sued because he may not have wealth.??
Maybe SB is not obsessed with money and feels she does not need to be in court for years trying to extract more money.... I think she will want some peace and quiet after all this media frenzy...not bring on another lot to cause her to have sleepless nights and less time with her daughter. JMO

None of us knows how SB feels, and we cannot presume that if she were to initiate a civil action, that her motivation would be an interest in extracting money.

A court action is about the law and justice, not greed. Victims of such a horrendous, life-altering crime should pursue every legal avenue available to them to extract the ultimate Justice, not simply to extract money. If initiating a civil action against a person responsible for a loved one’s death is the only way to hold someone accountable to the nth degree of the law, it is an avenue that should be pursued by every victim who has been so harmed, if they so choose, and for their own reasons.

 

[Blomquist]

from:
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - General Discussion and Theories #2



None of us knows how SB feels, and we cannot presume that if she were to initiate a civil action, that her motivation would be an interest in extracting money.

No-one was claiming to know how she feels .... or what her motivation may be...


A court action is about the law and justice, not greed. Victims of such a horrendous, life-altering crime should pursue every legal avenue available to them to extract the ultimate Justice, not simply to extract money. If initiating a civil action against a person responsible for a loved one’s death is the only way to hold someone accountable to the nth degree of the law, it is an avenue that should be pursued by every victim who has been so harmed, if they so choose, and for their own reasons.

Actually a civil court action is usually about financial gain as all civil actions have a dollar amount attached to them. If there is no dollar amount attached to it there is no case. IMO the ultimate justice is not financial gain...jmo. The ultimate justice would be making sure the actual murderer is jailed and prevented from such a crime again...with a penalty that fits the details of the crime. imo


Of course everyone is driven by various reasons.... and if someone wants 'justice' by way of financial extraction thats up to them. IMO.

purple responses

 

[Snoofo]

from:
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - General Discussion and Theories #2



None of us knows how SB feels, and we cannot presume that if she were to initiate a civil action, that her motivation would be an interest in extracting money.

A court action is about the law and justice, not greed. Victims of such a horrendous, life-altering crime should pursue every legal avenue available to them to extract the ultimate Justice, not simply to extract money. If initiating a civil action against a person responsible for a loved one’s death is the only way to hold someone accountable to the nth degree of the law, it is an avenue that should be pursued by every victim who has been so harmed, if they so choose, and for their own reasons.

True dat sillybilly. I guess we shall see. I gather SB will sue whomever she can sue, as is her right. But I do suspect this sort of thing happens only when the convicted in the criminal case has something to be sued for, so it does sort of boil down to money, doesn't it? I don't follow cases as much as I have followed this one, but do families typically sue their loved one's murderer if said murderer has no assets? I would think the whole process of a law suit is exhausting, especially after the toil of persevering through the emotional criminal case before the Court. Would they do it if their legal fees couldn't even be repaid if awarded? Do families foot the bill for this sort of thing even if they know they will have a judgement in their favour but the judgement amount and costs will never be paid??

Maybe some seasoned sleuths who have followed many cases would have the answers. I am curious now. All I can think of is the OJ case and, well, OJ had money.

 

[Alethea Dice]

All you have to do is look at the other threads of criminals awaiting trials here to see that's not true. Acting like DM isn't getting a lot of defense from a dedicated group here (that also does not defend other charged murderers) is specious at best, disingenuous at worst. Randy Allen Taylor, just to throw a name out, is getting slaughtered here due to, according to his lawyer, a single hair. No body, no vehicle found in his possession, circumstantial association with the victim.

I can only speak for myself, but I simply don't have the time to follow the many cases on here. I generally follow ones that are more local to me and/or that have grabbed my attention for various reasons. The cases that I have followed have generally had people on both sides. I will admit that I had no idea who Randy Allen Taylor even was.

I personally don't see it as "defending" DM, but simply people questioning things that don't make sense to them and reserving judgement until more information is available.

JMO

 

[Alethea Dice]

Something I find troublesome also is the fact it was reported other remains were found of the property but then MSM and LE were quick to deny. I guess once the PB was set, MSM would not be entitled to hear as to whether LE have found anymore remains while investigating. Because LB and WM's cases have a common denominator with DM, we will not be informed of what if anything is/was discovered regarding them until trial. I am sure LB's family would be notified because it is their daughter, but we the public are just that; the public. MOO.

<rsbm>

The last I remember is that LE confirmed that there was only one set of human remains found.

Hamilton police have confirmed that they are dealing with only a single set of human remains at the Waterloo region farm of Dellen Millard.

In the last few days, police sources had told CBC News they believed they had found other remains on the property, but they were unsure if they were animal or human.

On Tuesday, Hamilton police Sgt. Matt Kavanagh said, "We're dealing with one set of human remains."

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/story/2013/05/21/waterloo-millard-police-still-searching-farm.html

The LB and WM investigations are separate cases with different LE in a different jurisdiction/city. They would not fall under the publication ban. The current publication ban covers the evidence for TB's case and whatever happens in court. If anything is found in those investigations, I wouldn't be surprised to see it still reported. As far as I know, there is nothing legally stopping it from being reported, whether DM is found to be accused or not.

JMO

 

[Sillybilly]

@Blomquist (because your responses won't show up within the conventional quote feature)

While you are correct that civil remedies can only be financial, please don't presume that motivation of others is only about extracting money.

Some WS veterans here may recall that my only 2 children have died. I initiated a medical malpractice suit against those responsible for my son's death. Was it about money? Absolutely NOT !!! It was because through my own unbelievable agony, I stared into the innocent and beautiful faces of his children who would grow up without their father ... and I felt blind RAGE against those who may as well have taken his life with a bullet to the head, and those who lied through their teeth to cover up their involvement and their irresponsibility, and who left my grandbabies to grow up without their daddy, and me without my only remaining living child.

Believe me, my civil suit was not about money. It was about nothing but JUSTICE because I knew the truth, and the only way I could handle that truth was through the only legal process that was available because there were no criminal charges. I couldn't even get a lawyer to take the case because it wasn't worth enough money to them, so I initiated my own suit. I happened to luck in with one of the top notch medmal lawyers in Canada who advised me to a point, and then another firm stepped up to the plate ... not for money, but because they knew how passionate I was about our need for justice. I needed whatever justice I could get for myself and my grandchildren ... not money !! I needed a court of law to acknowledge and validate that my son, my grandchildrens' father, was valued by society as he was not valued by members of the medical community, and his death was catastrophic, and was caused by people who didn't care. I needed my grandchildren to grow up knowing that someone fought through the gates of hell for them, to bring about the only form of justice that was available to those who took their father away.

I was forewarned and knew all along there wouldn't be a lot of money because "judges cannot put a value on human life".

You call it money, I call it justice. There are victims who need to pursue that justice as part of whatever it takes to get them through their grief. If Sharlene Bosma wishes to pursue a civil action against those responsible for Tim's death, I would gladly hold her hand every step of the way as she walks through whatever it takes to deal with her grief.

 

[Snoofo]

@Blomquist (because your responses won't show up within the conventional quote feature)

While you are correct that civil remedies can only be financial, please don't presume that motivation of others is only about extracting money.

Some WS veterans here may recall that my only 2 children have died. I initiated a medical malpractice suit against those responsible for my son's death. Was it about money? Absolutely NOT !!! It was because through my own unbelievable agony, I stared into the innocent and beautiful faces of his children who would grow up without their father ... and I felt blind RAGE against those who may as well have taken his life with a bullet to the head, and those who lied through their teeth to cover up their involvement and their irresponsibility, and who left my grandbabies to grow up without their daddy, and me without my only remaining living child.

Believe me, my civil suit was not about money. It was about nothing but JUSTICE because I knew the truth, and the only way I could handle that truth was through the only legal process that was available because there were no criminal charges. I couldn't even get a lawyer to take the case because it wasn't worth enough money to them, so I initiated my own suit. I happened to luck in with one of the top notch medmal lawyers in Canada who advised me to a point, and then another firm stepped up to the plate ... not for money, but because they knew how passionate I was about our need for justice. I needed whatever justice I could get for myself and my grandchildren ... not money !! I needed a court of law to acknowledge and validate that my son, my grandchildrens' father, was valued by society as he was not valued by members of the medical community, and his death was catastrophic, and was caused by people who didn't care. I needed my grandchildren to grow up knowing that someone fought through the gates of hell for them, to bring about the only form of justice that was available to those who took their father away.

I was forewarned and knew all along there wouldn't be a lot of money because "judges cannot put a value on human life".

You call it money, I call it justice. There are victims who need to pursue that justice as part of whatever it takes to get them through their grief. If Sharlene Bosma wishes to pursue a civil action against those responsible for Tim's death, I would gladly hold her hand every step of the way as she walks through whatever it takes to deal with her grief.

I guess that answers my last question. Sillybilly, I am so sorry to hear this and I do understand what you mean by the example given, however it seems that was the only chance for justice in that instance so it is even further understood.
I am also very sorry to hear about Blomquist's tragic loss as well, since I did not mention it earlier but was saddened to hear about it. These horrible experiences seem to have given you both a lot of valuable knowledge and insight.

 

[swedie]

@Blomquist (because your responses won't show up within the conventional quote feature)

While you are correct that civil remedies can only be financial, please don't presume that motivation of others is only about extracting money.

Some WS veterans here may recall that my only 2 children have died. I initiated a medical malpractice suit against those responsible for my son's death. Was it about money? Absolutely NOT !!! It was because through my own unbelievable agony, I stared into the innocent and beautiful faces of his children who would grow up without their father ... and I felt blind RAGE against those who may as well have taken his life with a bullet to the head, and those who lied through their teeth to cover up their involvement and their irresponsibility, and who left my grandbabies to grow up without their daddy, and me without my only remaining living child.

Believe me, my civil suit was not about money. It was about nothing but JUSTICE because I knew the truth, and the only way I could handle that truth was through the only legal process that was available because there were no criminal charges. I couldn't even get a lawyer to take the case because it wasn't worth enough money to them, so I initiated my own suit. I happened to luck in with one of the top notch medmal lawyers in Canada who advised me to a point, and then another firm stepped up to the plate ... not for money, but because they knew how passionate I was about our need for justice. I needed whatever justice I could get for myself and my grandchildren ... not money !! I needed a court of law to acknowledge and validate that my son, my grandchildrens' father, was valued by society as he was not valued by members of the medical community, and his death was catastrophic, and was caused by people who didn't care. I needed my grandchildren to grow up knowing that someone fought through the gates of hell for them, to bring about the only form of justice that was available to those who took their father away.

I was forewarned and knew all along there wouldn't be a lot of money because "judges cannot put a value on human life".

You call it money, I call it justice. There are victims who need to pursue that justice as part of whatever it takes to get them through their grief. If Sharlene Bosma wishes to pursue a civil action against those responsible for Tim's death, I would gladly hold her hand every step of the way as she walks through whatever it takes to deal with her grief.

Very well said SB. Again my condolenses to you for the loss of your two children. I recall you speaking of them in the past and my heart sincerly goes out to you. I am in total agreement with you on your opinion about people doing it for justice and not for financial gain. A lawsuit would be up to Sharlene if she chooses to fight that fight. Is she does, it will be a long, painful process and she will need all the emotional and financial support she can get. I feel she is a very determined and strong woman and wants to see justice prevail to the full extent IMHO. For all her hardships she will encounter along the way, if she chooses to go the lawsuit route, I hope she wins. And with that win, I hope she gains financially to help her pay off the legal expenses incurred and have some sort of gain which she has lost due to the lose of her partner and the financial support he would have shared over the years. They say money does not buy happiness, but when something as tragic as this happens and you are left unexpectedly without your partner to share the financial responsibilities, that in itself can be a tragedy. If SB does not have the financial resources to pay her mortgage and bills, she may be forced from the home she loves and helped to build with Tim. Her home may mean a lot her her being as it was built by Tim and to lose it on top of the trauma she is already going through, could cause great distress that in itself. MOO

 

[swedie]

Copy and pasted from the incinerator thread. More appropriate over here IMHO.
Thank you for finding that article for me SB. :blowkiss: I came back on this eve, now that I have time and was going to go searching for it, but you saved me some work. Again much thanks, I appreciate this.

I do find it interesting DM and DP meet months ago through an acquaintance according to the article. I guess it could have happened a million different ways; nonetheless IMO very interesting. Maybe one day we will find out just how this first meeting came to be, the situation surrounding it. Did DM speak to DP in regards to trying to get the ball rolling on settling up his father's estate? Did it have something to do with LB disappearance? Did they party together somewhere? Again so many possibilities and the fact the reporter felt it was necessary to include this in the article. :waitasec: :moo:

Quote:
Originally Posted by swedie View Post
I feel certain I had read that somewhere right after DM's arrest. If true, wonder what that meeting was about? MOO
<rsbm>

You are correct swedie:

from:
http://www.thespec.com/news-story/32...thics-dispute/

Quote:
Paradkar, who met his client through a mutual acquaintance months ago, was named as Millard's lawyer at his very first court appearance on May 11 and has been very public, speaking regularly to the media about his client and the case.

 

[MsSherlock]

Copy and pasted from the incinerator thread. More appropriate over here IMHO.
Thank you for finding that article for me SB. :blowkiss: I came back on this eve, now that I have time and was going to go searching for it, but you saved me some work. Again much thanks, I appreciate this.

I do find it interesting DM and DP meet months ago through an acquaintance according to the article. I guess it could have happened a million different ways; nonetheless IMO very interesting. Maybe one day we will find out just how this first meeting came to be, the situation surrounding it. Did DM speak to DP in regards to trying to get the ball rolling on settling up his father's estate? Did it have something to do with LB disappearance? Did they party together somewhere? Again so many possibilities and the fact the reporter felt it was necessary to include this in the article. :waitasec: :moo:

Quote:
Originally Posted by swedie View Post
I feel certain I had read that somewhere right after DM's arrest. If true, wonder what that meeting was about? MOO
<rsbm>

You are correct swedie:

from:
http://www.thespec.com/news-story/32...thics-dispute/

Quote:
Paradkar, who met his client through a mutual acquaintance months ago, was named as Millard's lawyer at his very first court appearance on May 11 and has been very public, speaking regularly to the media about his client and the case.

IMO, some interesting and perhaps telling statements from DP.

May 13/13 When asked about DM's past, DP responds at 4:46, "no brushes with the law in terms of ever being in jail"

When asked if he had met DM before, DP responds at 6:14- "brief meeting with him thru another client on an unrelated matter"

http://www.cp24.com/news/lawyer-for...-will-plead-100-per-cent-not-guilty-1.1279416

May 15/13 When questioned about DM's exercising his constitutional right to remain silent, DP states at 3:30 "Even an innocent person"

http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/Canada/Hamilton/ID/2385605761/

May 17/13 When asked if DM is co-operating with LE to locate TB, DP responds at 1:21 "information has been provided thru other sources to assist the police in their investigation"

http://www.citynews.ca/2013/05/15/dellen-millards-lawyer-speaks-after-client-appears-in-court/

 

[Snoofo]

(Snipped for space)

May 17/13 When asked if DM is co-operating with LE to locate TB, DP responds at 1:21 "information has been provided thru other sources to assist the police in their investigation"

http://www.citynews.ca/2013/05/15/dellen-millards-lawyer-speaks-after-client-appears-in-court/[/QUOTE]

(UBM)

Good find, Sherlock!

This underlined bit is indeed interesting. I don't think I really "listened" to that part before. So perhaps while he maintained his right to be silent (which is what any lawyer and even a cop, off the record, would tell you to do), he may have instructed his lawyer to provide information to assist. I am uncertain as to who else the other sources would refer to -maybe some friends, but why wouldn't any of their statements be twisted too and used against him in the court of law? What a teaser but this has the potential to quiet some of the critics who faulted him for not assisting. If by chance he assisted in the investigation through an advocate, then there you go.

I regret snipping the rest now but I do recall the bit about they met through a client and to take it further, IIRC DM was a witness in an unrelated matter involving a friend but haven't found where I read that.

 

[Snoofo]

May 15/13 When questioned about DM's exercising his constitutional right to remain silent, DP states at 3:30 "Even an innocent person"

http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/Canada/Hamilton/ID/2385605761/

And this, UBM: I was curious when I saw the excerpt of DP's statement in your post and found it on youtube (the CBC player wasn't working for me). If you listen to the full statement IMO there's nothing about it to suggest he means his client DM is not one such an innocent person. I do not think it may have been a slip or anything. If you listen to the question and whole answer, he is educating the reporter who poses the question that even innocent people exercise that right to remain silent. Essentially, It's not just guilty people who are silent because they have something to hide.

Again, case in point: Susan Nelles - no matter how innocent she is and even looks in retrospect, she was once arrested and then considered a cold and feeling less devil by the vast majority for not talking when questioned. In the end the killer was a toxic chemical used in syringe wrappers.

 

[redheart]

(Snipped for space)

May 17/13 When asked if DM is co-operating with LE to locate TB, DP responds at 1:21 "information has been provided thru other sources to assist the police in their investigation"

http://www.citynews.ca/2013/05/15/dellen-millards-lawyer-speaks-after-client-appears-in-court/

(UBM)

Good find, Sherlock!

This underlined bit is indeed interesting. I don't think I really "listened" to that part before. So perhaps while he maintained his right to be silent (which is what any lawyer and even a cop, off the record, would tell you to do), he may have instructed his lawyer to provide information to assist. I am uncertain as to who else the other sources would refer to -maybe some friends, but why wouldn't any of their statements be twisted too and used against him in the court of law? What a teaser but this has the potential to quiet some of the critics who faulted him for not assisting. If by chance he assisted in the investigation through an advocate, then there you go.

I regret snipping the rest now but I do recall the bit about they met through a client and to take it further, IIRC DM was a witness in an unrelated matter involving a friend but haven't found where I read that.

Hmm, I don't interpret it that way at all. Not that either of us knows the intent, but I would think that DP would come right out and say that his client has used him (DP) to assist the police. Sounds much better for DM than "sources". Any lawyer will put the best spin on things they possibly can and to me DP saying "information has been provided thru other sources to assist the police in their investigation" means LE is hot on DM and MS' murderous trail, DP knows it, DP knows the public is disgusted by DM's silence in finding TB and is looking to paint his client in a more positive light without coming out and lying by saying DM helped LE. Hope that made sense, and all MOO of course.

 

[Snoofo]

Hmm, I don't interpret it that way at all. Not that either of us knows the intent, but I would think that DP would come right out and say that his client has used him (DP) to assist the police. Sounds much better for DM than "sources". Any lawyer will put the best spin on things they possibly can and to me DP saying "information has been provided thru other sources to assist the police in their investigation" means LE is hot on DM and MS' murderous trail, DP knows it, DP knows the public is disgusted by DM's silence in finding TB and is looking to paint his client in a more positive light without coming out and lying by saying DM helped LE. Hope that made sense, and all MOO of course.

Actually red, I take it all back. :back:
I said I didn't recall "listening" to that part but now I can confirm I didnt hear it either.

I took Ms. Sherlock's word for it, that what was said was what she quoted, but I just went back to the video link and he doesn't say that at all at 1:21 or anywhere in that clip. So i'm not sure where Sherley got that from, maybe paraphrased her interpretation (because they were on the topic of assisting LE)? either that or the wrong link accompanied that quote. I listened to it a few times and did not hear those words at all.

End of debate.:seeya:

 

[2Hope4]

We're looking for a used vehicle...and after reading about this case, I'll have several people going with me to look at them, and test drive them. Scary as all get out!

 

[Blomquist]

Actually red, I take it all back. :back:
I said I didn't recall "listening" to that part but now I can confirm I didnt hear it either.

I took Ms. Sherlock's word for it, that what was said was what she quoted, but I just went back to the video link and he doesn't say that at all at 1:21 or anywhere in that clip. So i'm not sure where Sherley got that from, maybe paraphrased her interpretation (because they were on the topic of assisting LE)? either that or the wrong link accompanied that quote. I listened to it a few times and did not hear those words at all.

End of debate.:seeya:

Agreed , seems to have been snippets, which when taken or interpreted out of context can lead to all sorts of convolution of truth.imo <modsnip>.... and I am grateful to her for finding those links as it gave us a chance to peruse them more fully. <modsnip>

 

[Blomquist]

We're looking for a used vehicle...and after reading about this case, I'll have several people going with me to look at them, and test drive them. Scary as all get out!

Always good to be extra vigilant.... good luck with your search

 

[MsSherlock]

Actually red, I take it all back. :back:
I said I didn't recall "listening" to that part but now I can confirm I didnt hear it either.

I took Ms. Sherlock's word for it, that what was said was what she quoted, but I just went back to the video link and he doesn't say that at all at 1:21 or anywhere in that clip. So i'm not sure where Sherley got that from, maybe paraphrased her interpretation (because they were on the topic of assisting LE)? either that or the wrong link accompanied that quote. I listened to it a few times and did not hear those words at all.

End of debate.:seeya:

Sorry Snoofo if the link, time and quote didn't match up. I will clarify now.

At approx 1:10 in the following clip (May 13/13) the reporter asks DP "Is he working with Hamilton Police in the search for Tim Bosma"
DP responds, word for word "he is exercising his constitutional rights to remain silent....he is protected under the constitution..ah..information has been provided thru other sources to assist the police in their investigation is all I can say".

http://www.cp24.com/news/lawyer-for...-will-plead-100-per-cent-not-guilty-1.1279416

Sorry for any confusion, you may have been listening to the wrong clip! :facepalm: