General Discussion and Theories #4

[Sillybilly]

If you read the comments, AB also mentions that WM sent another email to the same friend that was so "angsty" the friend deleted it.

We have no idea what the specifics of that "deleted" angsty email were, but in reading even further, other email(s) that were kept were said to contain reference to both parents being concerned about DM. If we are to believe whatever was in that unrecovered(?) email, it sounds like the angst may have been expressed about his son, compared to the email we have seen that expresses optimism when WM was discussing his business.

 

[Juballee]

I believe that the reference to both parents being concerned about their son was also made with the cavat that the author may be reading too much into things, if we are thinking of the same interpretation of the alledged letters. Has anyone here seen the letters that we are talking about, is there a link to the letters post on MSM, I may have missed them. Thanks

 

[Juballee]

A judge would ultimately rule on whether the transfers are null after hearing arguments on why they were made.

http://www.guelphmercury.com/news-s...millard-land-deals-beyond-smelly-experts-say/

RSBM

I wonder if a judge has ruled on this yet, they have had over 2 years to question it.

 

[swedie]

It can't be easy to get an MRO license and I'd think the fact that WM was able to obtain one for a new and improved MillardAir would have made him feel a sense of pride and accomplishment. Once that was obtained, the push would have been on to secure some contracts. I find it very hard to believe that WM gave this process less than 30 days before taking his life, leaving everything to his son to deal with. And letting down the people/friends that he had brought on board to be a part of the new company. Just doesn't add up to me. At all.

As for LB, was she not living apart from her parents when she disappeared? If she had committed suicide, what did she do with her purse full of identification, personal items and clothing that she was likely carting around in a suitcase of some sort, cell phone, iPad etc. Again, I find it very hard to believe that not one item has turned up. Unless they were all incinerated? Which kind of makes suicide for her unlikely as well.

MOO

It doesn't make sense in many ways at all WM would commit suicide. One thing is, if he admired Christ as DM claimed in WM's obituary, that would go against WM's religion/belief. According to the Bible, the only one who has the right to decide when we die is the Creator Himself. The Bible also says God has ordained the days of our lives. So, suicide specifically violates the will of God in a person's life.

Also, WM had been looking very forward to this new project since at least early 2010. If anything, at the end, WM would have pulled the rug out from under DM and told him he was no longer the CEO or on MA's payroll. Did WM do just that telling DM to pack up his belongings at both the hangar and the house? Did his patience finally wear out for DM? He was patient and stubborn. I could see that happening, especially after many years of his adult son riding on his financial coat tails, no motivation or ambition to do anything to pave and earn his own way in life. IMO DM knew his father meant business and DM's only way to secure his future was to murder his father. He planned WM's murder so well he probably could have gotten away with it and LB's if he wouldn't have also murdered TB. His hope was for a time when cooperation would be the norm. In DM's mind, it was worth the risk to murder his father to inherit his estate, then to be kicked to the curb with no job, no income and nothing worthwhile on his resume to land him a secure and well paid future. I think AS hit the nail on the head when he said DM was a spoiled brat who didn't appreciate anything his father did for him. Was AS a witness to many discussions/arguments between father and son? Sounds like AS wanted limited contact with DM and he dealt mainly with WM. After all DM was in charge of the construction end of MA and not necessarily anything else such as contracts. I'm sure AS heard a lot of griping from WM regarding DM. Again, it will be very interesting to hear what AS and other ex executives have to say when they finally take the witness stand during WM's case. Of course because WM is deceased he cannot speak for himself, witnesses will be able to relay this information to the jurors and it will not be classified as hearsay.

When evidence finally comes out in court, I think we will be amazed on how much direct and circumstantial evidence the Crown has against DM and how stupid he really was when carrying out the three murders. ALL MOO.

In May 2010, Wood revealed to airport consultants and planners that a potential investor had inquired about bringing in jetliners as big as a Boeing 757. He elaborated by email: "We have a customer telling us they would like to base a 757 here so we should try to accommodate that into our design … if possible."

In the summer of 2010, Millard, then 24, attended a business meeting at the local airport, east of Kitchener. There he represented his father Wayne

By the fall of 2010 the airport was preparing its expansion, amid some uncertainty. Minutes of a design meeting state: "There was an indication that the Millard development may not immediately proceed."

By 2011 the ambitious hangar project was back on track

In July 2011, the firm secured a building permit for a $6.4 million hangar on two hectares owned by the public. Construction launched on the red-roofed building. The hangar secured an occupancy permit in February 2012.

http://www.therecord.com/news-story...aster-inside-the-secret-millard-negotiations/

The farmland purchase...seems like a huge pay cheque for attending a few meetings. Sounds logical then why DM would include this in WM's obituary. WM was generous with others. There is no other indication as to how DM earned the money to afford such huge purchases. Of course unless he was running some sort of chop shop, perhaps dealing drugs or some other nefarious deeds. [/I] Now I can see many meanings/hints DM dropped while writing his father's obituary. MOO.

In May 2011, Dellen Millard bought the farm without conditions, a cash sale. It was listed for $899,000 and he purchased it for $835,000 from an older man who had raised livestock in the barn.

A month later in June 2011, Millardair finalized a site plan agreement with municipal governments and applied for a building permit for a 51,516-square-foot hangar at the northwest corner of the airport, valued at $6.4 million. The building permit was approved in July 2011.

The Millardair hangar was declared fit for occupancy in February 2012,

Transport Canada did not approve maintenance work until months later on Nov. 1, 2012. The federal certificate allowed the firm to perform maintenance on aircraft components such as engines.

Wayne Millard died in late 2012, leaving Dellen to take over the aviation business. The company soon asked Transport Canada to cancel its maintenance certificate, effective last Feb. 15.

http://metronews.ca/news/kitchener/674559/dellen-millards-hangar-from-jetliners-to-police-tape/

In his role as a business development consultant to Millardair’s new Waterloo airport venture, Al Sharif was happy to have only limited contact with Dellen Millard, the boss’s son and the guy in charge of hangar construction. As far as Mr. Sharif and other executives at the company were concerned, Dellen and his red mohawk spelled trouble.

“I thought he was just a spoilt little brat who had his way all his life and didn’t appreciate what his father was doing for him,” said Mr. Sharif. “He was an impediment to the hangar operation” who didn’t meet his deadlines, almost never arrived at work before noon, and refused to clear his collection of cars, jeeps, hot rods, jet skis and personal airplanes from the business premises.

http://www.annrbrocklehurst.com/201...en-millard-accused-murderer-of-tim-bosma.html

 

[swedie]

It can't be easy to get an MRO license and I'd think the fact that WM was able to obtain one for a new and improved MillardAir would have made him feel a sense of pride and accomplishment. Once that was obtained, the push would have been on to secure some contracts. I find it very hard to believe that WM gave this process less than 30 days before taking his life, leaving everything to his son to deal with. And letting down the people/friends that he had brought on board to be a part of the new company. Just doesn't add up to me. At all.

As for LB, was she not living apart from her parents when she disappeared? If she had committed suicide, what did she do with her purse full of identification, personal items and clothing that she was likely carting around in a suitcase of some sort, cell phone, iPad etc. Again, I find it very hard to believe that not one item has turned up. Unless they were all incinerated? Which kind of makes suicide for her unlikely as well.

MOO

Great point about why LB's belongs which haven't been recovered if she committed suicide. I wouldn't think someone who plans to commit suicide worries about getting rid of their personal items as well. If anything, I would tend to believe she would have left SL's ipad somewhere for him to retrieve it and perhaps left him a suicide note on it. She did take her dog to her parent's house, so why not the rest of her belongings also? Definitely not suicide. LE have evidence she was murdered and that is why DM and MS are charged with her murder.

Perhaps LB's cell phone was kept by DM and it became to bogus/burner phone used to make those calls to the Dodge truck owners? Was the sim card replaced by DM? Did he use one of his credit cards, or one of his fathers or maybe LB's to purchase the new sim card? Reflecting back on the MR case, LE were able to obtain video surveillance of MR in the Bell store when he took his damaged phone in. Credit card and debit card information can also be traced. ALL MOO.

Police tracked down the records after they determined Rafferty had exchanged his damaged BlackBerry at a Bell store in London's Masonville Place mall on May 14.

The court was shown a security video of a customer resembling Rafferty in the store on that date.
http://www.lfpress.com/news/london/raffertytrial/2012/04/17/19642726.html

 

[swedie]

RSBM

I wonder if a judge has ruled on this yet, they have had over 2 years to question it.

Me to, I do wonder. When you consider all the red tape and all of WM's assets and whatnot, I imagine it's a huge task to figure it all out. Especially when money was changing hands at a break neck speed.

The AG's decision to bypass the PH was decided mid July 2014, the 16th IIRC. That is when DP had been off the record, not officially retained by DM. So perhaps it's just been since last July investigators have picked up on something financially questionable between DP and the Millard money situation. Real estate sales, lawyers' fees, personal belongings/collections sales by SS, etc. Perhaps it is beyond smelly. We will just have to wait and see why DM never got to retain DP. It will all come out eventually. MOO.

From September 2014...

Paradkar was involved in the Sept. 9 meeting even though he does not officially represent Millard right now.

The Spectator has learned Paradkar is not currently retained by Millard, a possible serial killer facing charges in three separate murders.

"I am not on the record yet in Superior Court," Paradkar says, "but it's in the works right now."

While he was on the record for Millard when the matter was in the jurisdiction of the Ontario Court of Justice, once the case was committed to trial, it became a Superior Court matter. That means Paradkar must once again officially be retained by his client. That has not yet happened, even though it has been 10 weeks since it was announced that the attorney general had ordered a direct indictment, sending the case straight to trial without a preliminary hearing.

"It has nothing to do with finances," says Paradkar. "It's really because of the direct indictment."

Also, if finances are in fact a problem for Millard, there is the possibility his costs would be paid for by Legal Aid.

http://m.theweeklynews.ca/news-story/4869422-bosma-murder-trial-expected-for-fall-2015

July 19 2013
Six weeks after Dellen Millard, the man charged in the murder of Tim Bosma, transferred three properties to his mother for $1 each, one house has been sold and a condo is up for sale, the Star has learned.

http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2..._mother_sells_family_home_for_12_million.html

 

[Kamille]

RSBM

I wonder if a judge has ruled on this yet, they have had over 2 years to question it.

IMO, there would be no reason for this issue to be put before a judge or for a judge to rule on it until or unless a lawsuit is launched against DM. At that time, it may be scrutinized as a move to hide assets from creditors and the lawyer for the person(s) who are suing DM would likely launch an inquiry about the transactions.

MOO

 

[Juballee]

IMO, there would be no reason for this issue to be put before a judge or for a judge to rule on it until or unless a lawsuit is launched against DM. At that time, it may be scrutinized as a move to hide assets from creditors and the lawyer for the person(s) who are suing DM would likely launch an inquiry about the transactions.

MOO

That is if there is ever a lawsuit.

http://www.guelphmercury.com/news-s...millard-land-deals-beyond-smelly-experts-say/

"The act clearly states the transfer of property to "defeat, hinder, delay or defraud creditors or others of their just and lawful actions" — including suits or damages — is void if not done in "good faith" or with knowledge of such action against them."

Even then I have a feeling that it could be argued that DM signed power of attorney over to his mother in good faith, and they were not aware of any actions against them at that time. Was he supposed to wait countless years without a power of attorney in the chance that he may be sued later?

 

[Kamille]

That is if there is ever a lawsuit.

http://www.guelphmercury.com/news-s...millard-land-deals-beyond-smelly-experts-say/

"The act clearly states the transfer of property to "defeat, hinder, delay or defraud creditors or others of their just and lawful actions" — including suits or damages — is void if not done in "good faith" or with knowledge of such action against them."

Even then I have a feeling that it could be argued that DM signed power of attorney over to his mother in good faith, and they were not aware of any actions against them at that time. Was he supposed to wait countless years without a power of attorney in the chance that he may be sued later?

I'm not sure this is just about POA. I believe he actually transferred those properties to her for $1. So I suppose technically she owns them and the proceeds from the sales belong to her. For now. It's not a normal move for someone who claims to be innocent and instead, reeks of moving money around to protect it from lawsuits.

There is likely a POA in place for everything else that is taking place with regards to MillardAir.

MOO

 

[Arnie M]

.

Somebody is creating a monster that does not exist

The Millard assets are not on trial here , never have been , never will be , they will not be distributed to me , to you , to the courts , or to the victims.

Our justice system uses incarceration as the penalty for murder , not financial remuneration.

.

 

[Tamarind]

It doesn't make sense in many ways at all WM would commit suicide. One thing is, if he admired Christ as DM claimed in WM's obituary, that would go against WM's religion/belief. According to the Bible, the only one who has the right to decide when we die is the Creator Himself. The Bible also says God has ordained the days of our lives. So, suicide specifically violates the will of God in a person's life.

I think a vast amount of suicides are by christians. Depression doesn't always account for the state of mind at any given time, from what i can tell. The last person I heard about that committed suicide was a mormon. They have pretty firm religious christian beliefs and it didnt stop them from taking their own life.

Also, WM had been looking very forward to this new project since at least early 2010. If anything, at the end, WM would have pulled the rug out from under DM and told him he was no longer the CEO or on MA's payroll. Did WM do just that telling DM to pack up his belongings at both the hangar and the house? Did his patience finally wear out for DM? He was patient and stubborn. I could see that happening, especially after many years of his adult son riding on his financial coat tails, no motivation or ambition to do anything to pave and earn his own way in life.

I think something connected to the 'project' may have been key, in WM suicide IMO. There is nothing to suggest that WM was in any way upset with his son and I seen nothing to suggest DM held a grudge against his father. The obituary was very respectful IMO.

IMO DM knew his father meant business and DM's only way to secure his future was to murder his father. He planned WM's murder so well he probably could have gotten away with it and LB's if he wouldn't have also murdered TB.

We don't know what the outcome of the trials will be. IMO WM's death was either the result of a hit or he did actually commit suicide. We do not know where LB is and as of now no-one has been convicted in case of TB. IMO WM was proud of his son right to the end, even if he did take his own life. Maybe WM felt like he was a burden to DM, this is not a one shoe fits all situation IMHO.

His hope was for a time when cooperation would be the norm. In DM's mind, it was worth the risk to murder his father to inherit his estate, then to be kicked to the curb with no job, no income and nothing worthwhile on his resume to land him a secure and well paid future.

There is nothing to indicate that DM was about to be disinherited. In fact I think any father of a lone son would desperately want to ensure his son inherited. MOO

I think AS hit the nail on the head when he said DM was a spoiled brat who didn't appreciate anything his father did for him. Was AS a witness to many discussions/arguments between father and son?
Sounds like AS wanted limited contact with DM and he dealt mainly with WM. After all DM was in charge of the construction end of MA and not necessarily anything else such as contracts. I'm sure AS heard a lot of griping from WM regarding DM.

I think AS didn't really know WM or DM too well and was forming an opinion based on his own prejudices. JMO I'm sure we would have heard about any arguments had AS witnessed any, AS didn't seem to want to leave out anything negative about whether it was true or simply his opinion of DM IMO Maybe it was easier for AS to brush WM off than DM. I haven't read anything about WM griping to anyone about his son and I think AS would have mentioned if it had happened. JMO

Again, it will be very interesting to hear what AS and other ex executives have to say when they finally take the witness stand during WM's case. Of course because WM is deceased he cannot speak for himself, witnesses will be able to relay this information to the jurors and it will not be classified as hearsay.

Unless the witnesses give a true and credible account, together with having been involved with WM directly, it will be classed as hearsay or not credible or a hostile witness IMO. Testimony isn't just automatically believed regardless of whether someones hand is placed on a bible or not. IMO

When evidence finally comes out in court, I think we will be amazed on how much direct and circumstantial evidence the Crown has against DM and how stupid he really was when carrying out the three murders. ALL MOO.

I guess only the evidence and the trial can determine that. Circumstantial evidence is not enough to convict someone in a true and just court of law. JMO

In May 2010, Wood revealed to airport consultants and planners that a potential investor had inquired about bringing in jetliners as big as a Boeing 757. He elaborated by email: "We have a customer telling us they would like to base a 757 here so we should try to accommodate that into our design … if possible."

I wonder who that potential investor was. Maybe we will find out at trial. Didn't WM own the hangar/MRO?

In the summer of 2010, Millard, then 24, attended a business meeting at the local airport east of Kitchener. There he represented his father Wayne. By the fall of 2010 the airport was preparing its expansion amid some uncertainty. Minutes of a design meeting state: "There was an indication that the Millard development may not immediately proceed."

In July 2011, the firm secured a building permit for a $6.4 million hangar on two hectares owned by the public. Construction launched on the red-roofed building. The hangar secured an occupancy permit in February 2012.

Maybe someone else was interested in obtaining/building/utilizing the hangar and it caused a lot of uncertainty. MOO

The farmland purchase...seems like a huge pay cheque for attending a few meetings. Sounds logical then why DM would include this in WM's obituary. WM was generous with others. There is no other indication as to how DM earned the money to afford such huge purchases. Of course unless he was running some sort of chop shop, perhaps dealing drugs or some other nefarious deeds. [/I] Now I can see many meanings/hints DM dropped while writing his father's obituary. MOO.

People can be on a payroll for simply being an owner/partner of a company. We also know that WM accompanied DM to view the farm. Maybe WM gave his son the money or at least funded it. Why wouldn't he ? Which hints were you referring to in the obituary as I can't see any myself. MOO

In May 2011, Dellen Millard bought the farm without conditions, a cash sale. It was listed for $899,000 and he purchased it for $835,000 from an older man who had raised livestock in the barn.

He viewed the farm with his father WM, nothing has been deemed to be out of the ordinary in this transaction and no rift has come to light between Dellen and his father.

A month later in June 2011, Millardair finalized a site plan agreement with municipal governments and applied for a building permit for a 51,516-square-foot hangar at the northwest corner of the airport, valued at $6.4 million. The building permit was approved in July 2011.The Millardair hangar was declared fit for occupancy in February 2012, Transport Canada did not approve maintenance work until months later on Nov. 1, 2012. The federal certificate allowed the firm to perform maintenance on aircraft components such as engines.

The certificate allowed MillardAir, but it also secured the way for any future company to do MRO at that hangar/airport. FWIW. IMO.

In his role as a business development consultant to Millardair’s new Waterloo airport venture, Al Sharif was happy to have only limited contact with Dellen Millard the boss’s son and the guy in charge of hangar construction. As far as Mr. Sharif and other executives at the company were concerned, Dellen and his red mohawk spelled trouble.
“I thought he was just a spoilt little brat who had his way all his life and didn’t appreciate what his father was doing for him,” said Mr. Sharif. “He was an impediment to the hangar operation” who didn’t meet his deadlines, almost never arrived at work before noon, and refused to clear his collection of cars, jeeps, hot rods, jet skis and personal airplanes from the business premises.

If DM didnt appreciate what his father was doing for him why did DM show up to discuss the lack of contracts with AS? That is a clear indication that DM was in fact willing to question AS, defend his father and MillardAir as well as show appreciation for the company and his dad. IMO

 

[Tamarind]

I'm not sure this is just about POA. I believe he actually transferred those properties to her for $1. So I suppose technically she owns them and the proceeds from the sales belong to her. For now. It's not a normal move for someone who claims to be innocent and instead, reeks of moving money around to protect it from lawsuits.

There is likely a POA in place for everything else that is taking place with regards to MillardAir.

MOO

It is most definitely a normal move for someone who IS innocent IMO.

It is far easier for MB to deal with the money if it is technically hers. IMO. POA's can be problematic and are not the same as owning the assets yourself. It definitely makes life easier when trying to reinvest the money IMO. Naturally the POA will be for anything to do with the business as she can speak for DM in that regard. It makes perfect sense and reeks of nothing in the way of guilt. IMHO.

 

[Sillybilly]

.

Somebody is creating a monster that does not exist

The Millard assets are not on trial here , never have been , never will be , they will not be distributed to me , to you , to the courts , or to the victims.

Our justice system uses incarceration as the penalty for murder , not financial remuneration.

.

It's not about the criminal case .. we're talking about a civil lawsuit. Basically, if DM is found or pleads guilty, the victims' families can launch a civil suit, exactly the same as what happened in the Russ Williams case.

 

[Arnie M]

It's not about the criminal case .. we're talking about a civil lawsuit. Basically, if DM is found or pleads guilty, the victims' families can launch a civil suit, exactly the same as what happened in the Russ Williams case.

I realize that , but was anyone successful in the Williams lawsuit ?? I have not heard.

I cannot see how someone could be incarcerated as punishment , then later be sued for the crime , it is like being "punished" twice. And if money is part of the equation why not just fine the murderer a million dollars and save the government millions by not having to house him in jail.

I think it would open up too many cans of worms .

 

[matou]

If the victim's wife and child needed the victim for financial support than why not sue? The victim was trying to sell a truck. Russ Williams' rape victims were emotionally and psychologically messed up and could not recover to be able to cope with working. I believe the lawsuit was unsuccessful in that case but not 100% sure.

 

[Alethea Dice]

I wonder who that potential investor was. Maybe we will find out at trial. Didn't WM own the hangar/MRO?

<rsbm>

I believe that was MA who wanted to bring in planes as large as 757's. But there was another company in the planning talks as well. I wonder what the other company's proposal was (just curious). It seems the airport must have preferred the MA plans since they compromised on the design expansion and gave MA such low rent, or as WM put it "practically begged" them to build the hangar. JMO

Regional officials approved this cost as well as other asphalt costs to help park bigger jets on an airport apron. Wood defends the expense in a written statement. "In the design planning process, the decision was made to make some changes to the design of Apron 7 and Taxiway C to provide greater opportunities for the airport to attract a wider range of businesses (wider aircraft). It is important to note that this infrastructure benefits all future tenants and users of the entire airport."

On July 9, 2010, Wood convened a 2 p.m. meeting for two possible tenants of airport expansion. Dellen Millard attended as one of the potential tenants.

During the 90-minute meeting, the airport proposed to Millard that it would continue to design its expansion around smaller jets, on the understanding that if a larger jet such as a 757 arrived, special steps would be taken to move it around safely.

http://www.therecord.com/news-story/4485947-big-hangar-bold-plan-total-disaster-inside-the-secret-millard-negotiations/

http://www.annrbrocklehurst.com/2013/09/new-information-from-wayne-millard-about-the-millardair-kitchener-operations.html

 

[Kamille]

I realize that , but was anyone successful in the Williams lawsuit ?? I have not heard.

I cannot see how someone could be incarcerated as punishment , then later be sued for the crime , it is like being "punished" twice. And if money is part of the equation why not just fine the murderer a million dollars and save the government millions by not having to house him in jail.

I think it would open up too many cans of worms .

Victims sue other people for injury and wrongful death in accidents all the time. Apparently if you seriously injure or kill someone with your car, especially while impaired, not only are you subject to what the law throws at you, but the victim's family can also sue you, which is why you have insurance.

Suing someone convicted of murdering your loved one, for wrongful death, is no different really, except in most cases the murderer is indigent and it's not likely you'd ever be able to collect. So you wouldn't be putting out lawyer's fees for something you'll never be able to collect on even if you win your case.

TB was 32yrs old. He had many years of earning potential ahead of him. Likely in the 2-3 million dollar range (or more). His wife and daughter have lost that earning potential, not as a result of illness, which is always tragic although no one can be held accountable for that, but allegedly as a result of the actions of two individuals who are charged with his murder. It is certainly his family's prerogative to sue for wrongful death, should they be convicted, to try to recoup that lost earning potential but I have no idea if they would consider it.

MOO

 

[Kamille]

---

If the victim's wife and child needed the victim for financial support than why not sue? The victim was trying to sell a truck. Russ Williams' rape victims were emotionally and psychologically messed up and could not recover to be able to cope with working. I believe the lawsuit was unsuccessful in that case but not 100% sure.

Williams appears to be settling the lawsuits against him.

http://t.thestar.com/#/article/news...lliams_settles_lawsuits_with_two_victims.html

Ironically, his wife was also sued for helping him shield his assets. Something MB may find herself facing as well.

http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/...s-settles-out-of-court-with-numerous-victims/

 

[Juballee]

Isn't wrongful death covered under normal insurance policies?


Some might say that we have become an overly litigious society already, do we really need to sue for things that our insurance should cover? Is suing a back up plan for those in society who do not get insurance? If that were the case, then no one would bother getting insurance and everyone would wait to see if anything bad actually happened to them and then sue if they are the unlucky ones after the fact.

Is there a two tier justice system, where it is jail for the poor and middle classes, or jail plus being stripped of your familial possessions if you are above middle class?

So that would be to say that if MS and DM were equally guilty, that one should get a harsher punishment than the other just because they were raised in different socio-economic backgrounds, I'm sorry but in my opinion that sniffs of prejudice. I see no difference between that and giving one of two criminals convicted of the same crime vastly different punishments because one is a different colour, personally.


All my opinion only.

 

[Tamarind]

---

Williams appears to be settling the lawsuits against him.

http://t.thestar.com/#/article/news...lliams_settles_lawsuits_with_two_victims.html

Ironically, his wife was also sued for helping him shield his assets. Something MB may find herself facing as well.

http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/...s-settles-out-of-court-with-numerous-victims/

Nothing MB has done is in anyway unlawful. She obviously fully believes in her sons innocence. I don't believe there has been any shielding of assets. She has taken over assets lawfully. IMO

I don't believe MB will be facing any lawsuit. MOO