Okayy then ... I suppose my post could have succinctly qualified "alleged murder must have been considered premeditated by the Crown to constitute the 1st degree charge in her case".
It is understood, and a given to members of the general public, that charges laid by the Crown are allegations which are believed to be true, otherwise there wouldn't be any charges.
Yes but it is also understood that people charged have a right to a presumption of innocence also. The Crown may believe they have truth, but not all charges result in convictions. Which essentially clarifies that not all people charged are guilty and saying that not all convicted are guilty for that matter. So the Crown's beliefs are often just that.JMO