I don't think he's going to get off scot free either. He admitted to shooting and killing someone, it's just a question of whether he knew who he was shooting at. Unfortunately, due to the farce of this 'investigation', we'll probably never know the complete truth.
I will say on the issue of journalism. I feel sad that people are able to make quick judgements based on tabloid-level 'facts' when the reality is usually very different. I know I've learned my lesson a long time ago to take anything that doesn't come from either LE or the state with a grain a salt, because often times we see that journalists will run with the first hint of something that may or may not be true, simply because it sells newspapers and generates clicks online. It's better copy to say that he bashed her head in with a cricket bat or that he shot her in the bedroom. That doesn't mean it's the truth though.
13:57 - State denies that Botha conceded that ballistic evidence supported Oscar Pistorius shooting claims.
13:57 - Roux: The objective facts show that at the time of her demise, there was no urine in Reeva's bladder - backing up Oscar.
13:56 - Roux: Even if Reeva was dressed, doesn't mean she didnt go to the toilet.
13:55 - Roux: Pistorius could not have known the angle of the person behind the door.
15:28 - Nel: Even if you plan a murder... Mr Roux more experienced than I. Magistrate: In planning murders? Nel: No! Court erupts.
15:27 - Nair: You're working from point that no one else came onto the crime scene before police? The accused orchestrated the scene?
Oscar Pistorius starts to sob while Nel talks about Reeva's dead body. Brother Carl's hand on back.
15:26 - Nel keeps coming back to fact that Oscar Pistorius survived the night, thus his version is put to court.
BBM
IMO, this is yet more evidence against OP. Why waste ammo to subdue an intruder you can't see? It's completely illogical and shows poor gun training. Shooting at RS behind the closed toilet door was an act of rage. He could very well have not intended to kill her. He could very well be truly remorseful. That doesn't change the fact that his fit of anger caused a young woman's death. IMO, some of the best evidence against OP is in his lawyers' very well-crafted defense of him. Probably because they are the only ones working with the true story.
BBM
IMO, this is yet more evidence against OP. Why waste ammo to subdue an intruder you can't see? It's completely illogical and shows poor gun training. Shooting at RS behind the closed toilet door was an act of rage. He could very well have not intended to kill her. He could very well be truly remorseful. That doesn't change the fact that his fit of anger caused a young woman's death. IMO, some of the best evidence against OP is in his lawyers' very well-crafted defense of him. Probably because they are the only ones working with the true story.