Oh, so the fact that a mass shooting didn't kill anyone makes it better? GMAB. If a guy "accidentally drops a firearm causing it to discharge" then he's an irresponsible idiot who shouldn't have access to a gun.I was specifically speaking to your claim that "there have been over 200 Mass Murders since the start of the year". That is negligently inaccurate.
The Gun Violence Archive Mass Shooting metrics include any incident that involves a firearm - justified or otherwise - which injures four or more people, and the criteria does not include fatalities.
In other words, if a guy accidentally drops a firearm, causing it to discharge, wherein a single round grazes four people with non-life threatening injuries would meet GVA's criteria as a Mass Shooting.
Another example would be if a homeowner were to shoot a group of individuals during a home invasion, causing four injuries, and no fatalities, that would also meet GVA's criteria as a Mass Shooting.
Also, the GVA adds incidents that involve Airsoft/BB/Toy guns to the tally of Mass Shootings. Direct quote from GVA's website:
Here is the exact language GVA uses to define Mass Murder vs Mass Shootings :
---------------
Here is a link directly to their definitions and disclaimers, upon which these quotes were sourced.
Further, the metrics clearly show that handguns are the overwhelmingly utilized weapon in Mass Shooting/Mass Murder events. Unless grandpas old Colt 1911 handgun would qualify to you as an "Assault Weapon of Mass Destruction", this appeal to emotion is moot. Citation to the data that shows handguns are far more prevalent in these incidents.
The slaughter of innocent families and children are horrific. Uvalde school, Allen outlet mall, Buffalo supermarket. The list goes on and on. The GVA is providing a public service. Take it up with the news media who are reporting their statistics.
jmo