- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 33,198
- Reaction score
- 217,493
All terminology contrary to someone with "a depraved mind".
I think Chauvin is guilty as can be but why in the world does Minnesota have that ridiculous "depraved mind" condition in their murder law? It just seems completely unnecessary and muddies up guidelines. The verbal jury instruction is going to be critical in how that clause is explained. If you just take "depraved" and "evincing" at their Webster's Dictionary definitions it doesn't equal murder. It equals manslaughter. IMHO
I think the jury will be able to manage the depraved mind condition. They managed it in Noor's trial.
Noor shot willy-nilly at a defenseless woman who approached his car having reported a rape. Chauvin continued to kneel on the neck of a now-inert, non-responsive man for almost 4 minutes.
Neither of them cared that they were putting their victims at unreasonable risk of death or severe injury.