Dogface
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2009
- Messages
- 2,734
- Reaction score
- 453
Also noteworthy, the use of force in that case was reported to supervisors and Chauvin was cleared.
That is noteworthy indeed IMO.
Also noteworthy, the use of force in that case was reported to supervisors and Chauvin was cleared.
I'm not sure if that's one of the two they are allowing. There was also a 14 he used excessive force with. One of the cases that will be shown as evidence is an arrest during which a man was restrained and Chauvin witnessed the other officer's placing the suspect in the recovery position. The man suffered an asthma attack and later the hospital staff told the officers if they had not given him medical attention sooner he would have died.
It shows Chauvin knew the risk he was taking but did it anyway. Imo
The toxicologist who did the lab work testified that the level of methamphetamine was very low and was consistant with a prescription dose. I'm pretty sure Dr. Baker agreed that it was not a significant amount. ImoI totally agree!
It actually annoys me when people equate legally prescribed (and properly used) stimulants such as methylphenidate (Ritalin/Concerta), mixed amphetamine salts (Adderall), dextroamphetamine (Dexedrine), lisdexamphetamine (Vyvanse) and even methamphetamine (Desoxyn), with illegal meth or cocaine use.
I don't think it matters if drugs were a contributing factor, it would need to be a causal factor (at least in the case of 2nd degree murder).
From the defense's proposed jury instructions:
_____
The fact that other causes contributed to the death does not relieve the defendant of criminal liability. However, the defendant is not criminally liable if a “superseding cause” caused the death. A “superseding cause” is a cause that comes after the defendant’s acts, alters the natural sequence of events, and produces a result that would not otherwise have occurred. An overdose or heart failure that causes death is a superseding intervening cause.
https://mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/me...20-12646/ProposedJuryInstructions02082021.pdf
He was only disciplined for two incidents involving excessive force. One was a shooting and I'm not sure what the other one was. It may have been a police chase which ended with two people being killed. ImoAlso noteworthy, the use of force in that case was reported to supervisors and Chauvin was cleared.
sharing this that I came across...sounds very similar to the situation with GF, and the person survived(although I’m sure they had some trauma from it). So it’s hard for me to accept that a healthy person would have died from it. But then again, I’m no expert.
Edit: I forgot the link
Prosecutors say Chauvin kept his knee on teenager’s back for 17 minutes in 2017, while the boy said ‘I can’t breathe’ - Minnesota Reformer
Yep.And thus far there have been no superseding cause.
Not following. What would he be disciplined for?
Calling it a homicide?
Saying it was due to what was a result of LE actions?
It is irrelevant where the drug was sourced, the only relevance is what remained of a known identifiable drug in his system post mortem on toxicological analysis.The toxicologist who did the lab work testified that the level of methamphetamine was very low and was consistant with a prescription dose. I'm pretty sure Dr. Baker agreed that it was not a significant amount. Imo
The toxicologist who did the lab work testified that the level of methamphetamine was very low and was consistant with a prescription dose. I'm pretty sure Dr. Baker agreed that it was not a significant amount. Imo
There were also several conflicting reports from his offices, were there not?If it can be demonstrated he purposely minimized cause of death information to protect city employees, the possibility of discipline exists.
That's likely because toxicology and pharmacology is not his specialty.I just watched Baker's testimony, I disagree that he agreed it was not a significant amount. He says that he is unaware if there is a quote-unquote 'a safe level of methamphetamine'.
And thus far there have been no superseding cause.
My gosh. This guy is a menace.This says “back”, not “neck”.
eta:
Not that it was acceptable, imo:
“According to the prosecution, the videos show that 33 seconds after telling the boy to come out of the room, both officers grabbed him. When he refused to get on his stomach, Chauvin hit him with his flashlight twice and grabbed his throat and applied a neck restraint causing him to lose consciousness.“
[...]
“Over the next several minutes, the boy repeatedly told the officers he couldn’t breathe and his mother begged Chauvin to take his knee off her son.
Chauvin replied that the boy was a “big guy” and did not move his knee, according to the court document.
“Although the child’s ear was actively bleeding and he repeatedly told the officers he was in pain, the officers continued to restrain him instead of administering medical treatment,” the filing says.“
eta2: “grabbed his throat“, we saw him do that with GF, too. As I understand it, that’s not within procedure.
I haven't heard that he was or wasn't playing basketball earlier. And I'm not saying he was playing basketball early. I'm just saying that when he told the cops he was "hoopin" earlier, he was telling them that he was playing basketball. Whether he actually was playing or not, I have no clue.Did they describe what he had been doing that day? Had he in fact been playing basketball?
I have a question. Chauvin originally agreed to take a plea for 3rd degree murder but the AG denied it. 3rd degree was put back in as an option at the start of the trial, can Chauvin not decide at any time prior to the end of the trial to plead guilty to 3rd degree murder?
Reposting the autopsy report.Whew!
found it!
here’s the autopsy
https://www.hennepin.us/-/media/hen...lic-safety/documents/floyd-autopsy-6-3-20.pdf
In this part of the article it say's neck restraint.This says “back”, not “neck”.
eta:
Not that it was acceptable, imo:
“According to the prosecution, the videos show that 33 seconds after telling the boy to come out of the room, both officers grabbed him. When he refused to get on his stomach, Chauvin hit him with his flashlight twice and grabbed his throat and applied a neck restraint causing him to lose consciousness.“
[...]
“Over the next several minutes, the boy repeatedly told the officers he couldn’t breathe and his mother begged Chauvin to take his knee off her son.
Chauvin replied that the boy was a “big guy” and did not move his knee, according to the court document.
“Although the child’s ear was actively bleeding and he repeatedly told the officers he was in pain, the officers continued to restrain him instead of administering medical treatment,” the filing says.“
eta2: “grabbed his throat“, we saw him do that with GF, too. As I understand it, that’s not within procedure.
Seven minutes after applying the neck restraint and taking the boy to the ground, the boy asked to be put on his back because his neck hurt. He began crying, and asked again.
There's an interview that Mr Hall did (prior to his most recent arrest), that was apparently aired by Court TV.
I have found a shortened version of the interview on the Court TV YouTube channel, but evidently a longer version was aired.
<modsnip: Removed discussion of social media that is not an approved source>
Shortened version ( doesn't mention what they were doing):