Interesting. I was unaware a witness refusal to testify could result in a mistrial.If he doesn't testify I wonder if that will lead to a mistrial.
What is a mistrial?
What is a mistrial?
True but his gastric contents could have contained occult blood or even fresh blood.. the entire stomach should have been sent to laboratory IMO, even if appeared normal to the naked eye.. there is no way to see many substances or pathologies other than under a microscope or a chemical ad or biological analysis.Yes, some may have dissolved in his mouth, but I think he had taken most of the fentanyl earlier. For all we know it could have been from the day before. I don't think there is any way to know for sure. The ER doctor testified that he saw no signs of overdose.
Did Dr. Baker say he did not test the stomach contents? I would think they would for a homicide case, just to rule out other possibilities.
Anyway, now that he has confirmed an overdose was not the cause of death, along with the other expert testimony, I think the defense will have a hard time convincing the jury that the COD was an overdose and the officer's actions did not play a significant role.
I think he can just come in and plead the 5th but Judge Cahill will not quash the subpoena. He needs to come in and plead in person.Interesting. I was unaware a witness refusal to testify could result in a mistrial.
I remember the outrage when the first autopsy report was released.I thought that I had read that neither Autopsy 2 or 3 had access to the actual body, but maybe I'm remembering incorrectly? Clearly my brain and fingers aren't 100% in gear today...![]()
Yes, some may have dissolved in his mouth, but I think he had taken most of the fentanyl earlier. For all we know it could have been from the day before. I don't think there is any way to know for sure. The ER doctor testified that he saw no signs of overdose.
Did Dr. Baker say he did not test the stomach contents? I would think they would for a homicide case, just to rule out other possibilities.
Anyway, now that he has confirmed an overdose was not the cause of death, along with the other expert testimony, I think the defense will have a hard time convincing the jury that the COD was an overdose and the officer's actions did not play a significant role.
It will be disturbing from a judiciary standpoint if Morries Hall is not brought to court. He plays an important role and needs to appear.
I think I know who wrote the note while meeting with Dr. Baker now. It was mentioned in his testimony yesterday too, he was asked if he met with prosecutors in the case where notes were taken or something like that.
He and others were removed because they met with the ME without a non-attorney present, which was in violation of Minnesota state law and it now leaves an opportunity for them to be called as witnesses. There may be other reasons, but this one seems to be the m
ajority of the reason. JMO
There was a third autopsy?I thought that I had read that neither Autopsy 2 or 3 had access to the actual body, but maybe I'm remembering incorrectly? Clearly my brain and fingers aren't 100% in gear today...![]()
There
was a third autopsy?
This link not great
Things To Know - Autopsy 101 | Post Mortem | FRONTLINE | PBS
Did the second autopsy send gastric contents to the laboratory does anybody know?
Surely both did not fail the victim?
Is it possible?
There was a third autopsy?
Thanks @sds71Judge Cahill changed his decision to remove Freeman and others from the case.
The Court’s oral order of September 11, 2020, removing the above-named attorneys from these cases is hereby VACATED:
https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgo...46/27-CR-20-12646_Order-Granting-Motion-2.pdf
Yes, I don't understand why he didn't test the stomach contents. All it says in the autopsy report was that the stomach contained a dark liquid with numerous gray-white food particles that looked like bread.True but his gastric contents could have contained occult blood or even fresh blood.. the entire stomach should have been sent to laboratory IMO, even if appeared normal to the naked eye.. there is no way to see many substances or pathologies other than under a microscope or a chemical ad or biological analysis.
The victim is entitled to that.
Did the vitreous go to a lab?
The gastric contents were retained.
ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES:
Postmortem specimens collected and retained: vitreous fluid, femoral blood, urine, liver, and gastric contents.
Autopsy Report for George Floyd