Germany/Portugal - Christian Brueckner, 27 @ time of 1st crime (2004), charged with sexual assault crimes, Praia de Rocha, Portugal. #5

Status
Not open for further replies.
RSBM.

To be fair, i haven't seen anything remotely approaching evidence CB is guilty. Mostly what I have seen is a bare accusation for HCW that he did a murder. I am willing to give that some weight out of deference to the institution. But i simply don't think it is accurate that we know of too many coincidences. IMO all we have is one claim of a confession, which has been put in the media - an alarming result - as we've just seen. I hope that isn't central from everyones sake because the courts won't like it.

MOO
IMO there are several coincidences (already extensively discussed here) that if not reinforced by a WORLDWIDE accusation and appeal made by a german police force and then searches by 3 police forces, could be seen as, perhaps, just mere. IMO they aren't at all. IMO beyond implausible to think CB is not involved and not the responsible.
 
The media have by and large controlled or tried to control the narrative highlighted when SF said the BKA had found something belonging to MM, HCW had to deny this.

New evidence found against MM prime suspect, prosecutor says

In the interview, Ms F asked Mr W:
“Is it true that you found something belonging to MM in the caravan of CB? You can’t deny it, can you?”
He replied: “I don’t want to deny it.
“We are sure that he is the murderer of MM.
“We are sure that he killed MM.”
The prosecutor's verbatim words don't actually say what you claim unless semantics is employed to interpret the conversation.
My opinion
 
I fear the business of coincidences will not be resolved until they are brought before the court by the prosecution with an explanation of how they are significant.
 
IMO there are several coincidences (already extensively discussed here) that if not reinforced by a WORLDWIDE accusation and appeal made by a german police force and then searches by 3 police forces, could be seen as, perhaps, just mere. IMO they aren't at all. IMO beyond implausible to think CB is not involved and not the responsible.
Yes - that’s the very nature of sleuthing. If one doesn’t want to discuss theories about CB then for what purpose is one on a sleuth thread about CB?
 

New evidence found against MM prime suspect, prosecutor says

In the interview, Ms F asked Mr W:
“Is it true that you found something belonging to MM in the caravan of CB? You can’t deny it, can you?”
He replied: “I don’t want to deny it.
“We are sure that he is the murderer of MM.
“We are sure that he killed MM.”
The prosecutor's verbatim words don't actually say what you claim unless semantics is employed to interpret the conversation.
My opinion
Yes - it’s as if a lot of coincidences & 3 investigations don’t have significance therefore business as usual may prevail.

We’re back to things magically not happening until a case is brought.
 
I fear the business of coincidences will not be resolved until they are brought before the court by the prosecution with an explanation of how they are significant.
The here and now of the issue is that victims of crime have been disastrously let down and a measure of protection has been removed from the general populace at large by the German court which has wiped the slate clean for an offender described by ''A forensic psychiatrist who assessed the prime suspect in the MM case has warned that he is in the top one per cent of dangerous criminals and that he would likely claim a new victim 'soon' if he is freed from jail.''

As may be very soon indeed which is no doubt concentrating the minds of those whose job it is to protect the public.
''Speaking today at Braunschweig Regional Court, Dr R, 47, head of the correctional facility in Bad Rehburg said he scored him as 99 per cent on a scale of dangerousness.

'He is one of the absolute top dangerous people,'Dr R said, adding in a stark warning that: 'A new victim is to be expected soon.'

It was also revealed that CB scored nearly 100 per cent on a test where just over 60 per cent suggests the subject is a psychopath.

'The application of various procedures leads to the conclusion that CB can be categorized in the absolute top league of dangerousness', the expert said.''

That professional assessment leaves no doubt when given in evidence and yet was lumped in with all the other trial evidence denigrated in cavaleir fashion by the presiding judge.
 
Even the confession is steeped in ambiguity. CB do not actually say he killed MM or even took her. That is the interpretation of the witness.

To even call it a confession is absurd!

And while none of us have any idea what the BKA is hanging its guilty hat on, I very much doubt it's this or dependant upon this. Or, hopefully, at the very least, not just this. Because that would be truly beyond absurd.
 
Last edited:
Prepare to continue the discussion on a new thread…
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
196
Guests online
539
Total visitors
735

Forum statistics

Threads
625,593
Messages
18,506,777
Members
240,819
Latest member
Berloni75
Back
Top