I can't do a search for 'DNA' as the word is too short for the search bar, but I've found these two posts by our Greek speakers in this thread -Re: 'orphan DNA' - debate over whether it was found on C's body.
Ta Nea May 23:
The "orphan" DNA
One of the most important elements in the hands of the authorities is the "orphan" DNA samples from the attic of the tragedy. This confirms the presence of other people besides Caroline and her husband in the house.
It is worth noting, however, that until we reach this point it will be preceded by a time-consuming research process, in order to exclude persons who were related to the couple, had visited the maisonette and perhaps left their genetic material there in controversial places, mainly in the attic bedroom, where it all happened.
The points, where the experts of the laboratories that literally "leaf and feather" found the maisonette in Glyka Nera, "found" genetic material, "betray" the presence of an unknown person in the attic, it remains to be seen if it is the DNA of the perpetrators.
There is no mention here of it being on her body, just in the attic.
Ta Nea May 24:
Balaskas: "Orphan" DNA samples have been found
"We are doing very well in the investigations," said EL.AS trade unionist Stavros Balaskas, referring to the course of the investigation into the murder of the 20-year-old woman, emphasizing that "orphan" DNA samples have been found on Caroline's body. "We have to identify the DNA, because we have not received DNA from all the criminals in the country," he added.
Did EL.AS SB actually say it was found on the body or was that a mistake on the part of the reporter? Is the reporter confusing the 'orphan DNA' with whatever they hoped was under her fingernails?
Sun June 4
THE hunt for sadistic thieves who tortured a Brit mum to death has been dealt a blow after it emerged no DNA has been found under her fingernails.
No mention of the 'orphan dna' as it's already been attributed to the carpenter. No reference to pending 'dna found on body' either.
News 24 7 gr June 11:
The only identified genetic materials, fingerprints, etc. belonged to the victim's husband and a carpenter who had done some work at the house on Panagouli Street.
The 'orphan DNA' belonged to the carpenter? There is no mention of DNA on C's body.
...Aside from the May 24 which paraphrases - not a direct quote - the officer saying some DNA was found on C's body, there is no mention in any other article about this (and none in many other articles not cited, like Greek City Times, June 6), so I'm chalking it up to a reporter mistake. There's only been 2 bits of DNA this whole time with regards to C, and that is the 'orphan' in the bedroom, not on her body, and whether there was any under her fingernails. The info changes fast and as details are cleared up, 'facts' like 'dna on the body' get tossed in the garbage. If you can find a recent article that says there's dna on the body and that they're still working on it or solved, then sure, I'll eat my words, without seasoning, ...
So, as far as I know, it's a month later, and yet LE still hasn't found any evidence of the existence of the alleged robbers. No DNA, no fingerprints, no CCTV footage. Nothing.
JMO
Or at least that's what they say to the media