SapphireSteel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2012
- Messages
- 6,788
- Reaction score
- 113
Let's have a look at what Robert Murat has to say, being the first victim of the McCann spin -
05 March 2010
Robert Murat continues to receive death threats and has lost the sense of life Público
His life has been "shattered". He wanted to help, he alleges, but ended up as an arguido. Now he tries to find a direction. But that night in 2007 continues to persecute him.
by Idálio Revez
05 March 2010
Thanks to Astro for translation
Robert Murat, three years after Maddie's disappearance, in Praia da Luz, still has his life "shattered" because he was "at the wrong place, at the wrong time".
The first suspect of being involved in the child's disappearance was this English man, aged 36, for whom being made arguido earned him a condemnation from public opinion that he never freed himself from. In an interview to Público, the first one that he gives to a member of the media since the English child's disappearance, leaves a question in the air that robs him of his sleep until this day: "Three of the McCanns' friends were at the PJ, saying that they had seen me there, that night [May 3, 2007]. What I ask is why did they lie?".
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id218.html
Why did they lie? Or are we still claiming everyone else is lying except the Tapas?
:banghead:
05 March 2010
Robert Murat continues to receive death threats and has lost the sense of life Público
His life has been "shattered". He wanted to help, he alleges, but ended up as an arguido. Now he tries to find a direction. But that night in 2007 continues to persecute him.
by Idálio Revez
05 March 2010
Thanks to Astro for translation
Robert Murat, three years after Maddie's disappearance, in Praia da Luz, still has his life "shattered" because he was "at the wrong place, at the wrong time".
The first suspect of being involved in the child's disappearance was this English man, aged 36, for whom being made arguido earned him a condemnation from public opinion that he never freed himself from. In an interview to Público, the first one that he gives to a member of the media since the English child's disappearance, leaves a question in the air that robs him of his sleep until this day: "Three of the McCanns' friends were at the PJ, saying that they had seen me there, that night [May 3, 2007]. What I ask is why did they lie?".
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id218.html
Why did they lie? Or are we still claiming everyone else is lying except the Tapas?
:banghead: