GUILTY GUILTY OF ABUSE OF A CORPSE ONLY OH - Annabelle Richardson, newborn, found in grave 7 May 2017 #3

[Jewels53]

It wasn't relayed to doctor because BSR lied to the doctor and his medical assistant when she gave the date or her last period. He did not have accurate information to determine approximate conception.

According to OBGYN testimony, BSR told both doctor and medical assistant that her last period was in March/ April 2018, but her urine tested positive for pregnant. Also, she never reported to her OBGYN that she had irregular periods. In fact, I believe she told them all was normal.

Later at police department, BSR told her dad that Tre was the father -- a fact undisputed by all parties. Tre testified they had unprotected sex in August 2017--prior to him starting his freshman year at Wright State.

I think you might have the years wrong. Didn't she give birth in 2017?

 

[Daytocincy]

The lighting of the baby's foot was a huge part of this trial. I'm not sure how you missed that. And it's ridiculous. JMO

 

[osu]

I doubt anybody from prosecution looked up Babypedia -- like we did!!

First, the shopping link does not work, and I doubt BSR went further than their home page -- quickly tuned out just seeing the first paragraph-- childcare, crying, breastfeeding - Nope!

It is traditional in western society for children to be looked after by one or both of their parents.... the childcare role is taken on by the extended family. ...

Infants cry as a form of basic instinctive communication. A crying infant may be trying to express a variety of feelings including hunger, discomfort, over-stimulation, boredom, wanting something, or loneliness.

Breastfeeding is the recommended method of feeding by all major infant health organizations

BabyPedia™ - The Baby Encyclopedia - Home Page

Lol, I doubt they did either, but maybe they should have especially if defense attorney Rittgers was claiming BSR was searching for baby clothes on that site.

JMO

 

[princessdana]

The lighting of the baby's foot was a huge part of this trial. I'm not sure how you missed that. And it's ridiculous. JMO

it is! it never happened and it doesn't change anything. the baby is already dead.

 

[princessdana]

it is! it never happened and it doesn't change anything. the baby is already dead.

she might have put her in the fire pit and thought about burning her but changed her mind and buried her instead

 

[princessdana]

she might have put her in the fire pit and thought about burning her but changed her mind and buried her instead

you can't light a fire and expect it to be unnoticed

 

[Seattle1]

I think you might have the years wrong. Didn't she give birth in 2017?

Thanks - caught in time to edit!

 

[dixiegirl1035]

I think what she was asked was the date of her last menstrual period and her periods were irregular because of her eating disorder. Her current boyfriend was in the picture, too.

JMO

Exactly, you're making my point. They know that she did not conceive in February or March is that was totally out of the picture. And she only had unprotected sex the previous year in August.

If her periods were irregular or not, and she bled during the pregnancy she said, isn't it simple to just say I only had unprotected sex once in August.

At least that way, her doctor would know approximately, and not even consider 32 weeks IYKWIM.

You've made me even reconsider another huge problem she has. I think getting any information out of her is like pulling teeth! She doesn't want to talk at all and give anyone pertinent information, and therefore I can understand why the detectives were so frustrated as she would not give them a narrative.

Perhaps that's why they felt they had no choice except to use the Reid technique.

 

[kim.kitchenstupman]

The lighting of the baby's foot was a huge part of this trial. I'm not sure how you missed that. And it's ridiculous. JMO

If you are referring to me... I remember the lighting of foot but not the fire to the chest. Geez! I listen while I am at work and do not quite hear everything! I would not say it is a huge part of the trial but whatever. The fire or the no fire has NOTHING to do with the murder of the baby. The fire or the charred bones are irrelevant to me in determining her guilt or innocence.
Sorry, I am so ridiculous for you. I will certainly try harder.

 

[Jewels53]

Thanks - caught in time to edit!

Your welcome!

 

[Cindizzi]

BabyPedia™ - The Baby Encyclopedia - Home Page

Not saying this is what BSR was looking for (it's not a particularly informative site), just showing that it exists.

I found this interesting,too. In the first interview when Det Faine told her they were going to search her phone he asked if she had searched for anything about abortion and she said she looked for “something like how to get rid of a baby “ and saw something about different pills you could take,etc. I wonder why that didn’t show up. Looks like the only searches they could find were 1. Hilltop Ob/Gyn, 2. What happens at an ob/gyn appt when you are pregnant and 3. Babypedia. The defense keeps bringing up babypedia.com like it’s a place to shop for baby clothes. I googled it and it looks like a site that has forums and general info.

 

[Daytocincy]

And this guy is a coroner on steroids. At last check he was collecting four paychecks, working for three different counties, and a state police academy. MOO

I'd rather have a medical examiner or forensic pathologist than a coroner. Coroner's aren't always required to have specific experience... Elected, not appointed. Jmo

I'm unsure of the qualifications of the coroner in this part of OH

I remember looking this up a few months ago, and "coroners" are the law in State of Ohio-- with the exception of two counties that abolished the office of coroner and created the office of medical examiner (N/A this case).

County coroner is elected for term of 4 years; and must be licensed physician for at least 2 years.

From Ohio CDC

 

[princessdana]

If you are referring to me... I remember the lighting of foot but not the fire to the chest. Geez! I listen while I am at work and do not quite hear everything! I would not say it is a huge part of the trial but whatever. The fire or the no fire has NOTHING to do with the murder of the baby. The fire or the charred bones are irrelevant to me in determining her guilt or innocence.
Sorry, I am so ridiculous for you. I will certainly try harder.

I think.she meant the theory is ridiculous not you. that's what I meant.

 

[Jewels53]

On the burning of the baby. I would not be surprised if Skylar did attempt to take a lighter to the baby thinking she could cremate her. Then realized it would not work. It would only burn a little piece of flesh. Therefore admitting she only burned her a little bit or tried to cremate her a little. jmo

 

[Daytocincy]

If you are referring to me... I remember the lighting of foot but not the fire to the chest. Geez! I listen while I am at work and do not quite hear everything! I would not say it is a huge part of the trial but whatever. The fire or the no fire has NOTHING to do with the murder of the baby. The fire or the charred bones are irrelevant to me in determining her guilt or innocence.
Sorry, I am so ridiculous for you. I will certainly try harder.

I meant the burning of a newborn by holding a lighter to it's foot is ridiculous, not your opinion. I apologize that I was not more clear.

 

[kim.kitchenstupman]

I think.she meant the theory is ridiculous not you. that's what I meant.

Oh shoot! You might be right. I honestly have no idea. If I am wrong, I apologize. I think it is time for me to go to bed. I am "trialed" out.

 

[Jewels53]

And this guy is a coroner on steroids. At last check he was collecting four paychecks, working for three different counties, and a state police academy. MOO

That could be the district they cover, not because they choose all those counties.

https://www.mcohio.org/Coverage map 07-2018 .jpg

 

[kim.kitchenstupman]

I meant the burning of a newborn by holding a lighter to it's foot is ridiculous, not your opinion. I apologize that I was not more clear.

No, I am sorry.
I should have not got so defensive.

 

[princessdana]

I meant the burning of a newborn by holding a lighter to it's foot is ridiculous, not your opinion. I apologize that I was not more clear.

yes same! sorry about the confusion

 

[princessdana]

On the burning of the baby. I would not be surprised if Skylar did attempt to take a lighter to the baby thinking she could cremate her. Then realized it would not work. It would only burn a little piece of flesh. Therefore admitting she only burned her a little bit or tried to cremate her a little. jmo

yes! maybe in the fire pit. then realizing it wouldn't work