rosemadderlake
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Messages
- 3,395
- Reaction score
- 6,417
https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/555101/
(The Atlantic is considered to have a left centre bias with high factual reporting
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-atlantic/ )
*
Good article. From your link:
Anyone who claims that the text of the amendment is plain has a heavy burden to carry. The burden is even heavier if an advocate argues that the Second Amendment was understood to upend laws against concealed carry or dangerous weaponsboth of which were in force in many parts of the country long after it was adopted.
So it may be that the amendments text supports something like where we are now: Dick Heller, a law-abiding citizen, can own a handgun in his home for self-protection. The text and context, however, dont point us to an unlimited individual right to bear any kind and number of weapons by anyone, whether a minor or a felon or domestic abuser. That would be a right that, if recognized by the courts, has the potential to disrupt our society at a profound level; a right that, as Fallowss correspondent blithely asserts, renders the damage of gun violence utterly irrelevant.
---
Bbm: where we are today...