Head blow vs strangulation

santos1014 said:
This may be a stupid question, but how does LE know that something has been "wiped off..or clean"?
I guess because a flashlight would have prints on it...and the batteries inside of it....even if it had not ever been used before, it was still handled by SOMEONE...for it to have gotten to the location that it was found in. In other words, it just didn't magically appear where it was found....someone HAD to have place it there, but when it was checked for fingerprints, none was there....and that would be impossible, UNLESS it had been wiped down.
 
Ames said:
I guess because a flashlight would have prints on it...and the batteries inside of it....even if it had not ever been used before, it was still handled by SOMEONE...for it to have gotten to the location that it was found in. In other words, it just didn't magically appear where it was found....someone HAD to have place it there, but when it was checked for fingerprints, none was there....and that would be impossible, UNLESS it had been wiped down.
There you go!
 
santos1014 said:
This may be a stupid question, but how does LE know that something has been "wiped off..or clean"?
Cause it was cleaner than a hounds tooth. Not a single trace of a print on it or the batteries inside it. Do you glove yourself and wipe down batteries before inserting them so that even manufacturing workers prints are not on them? flashights that have ever been used are going to have prints. Cause the humanbeing that used it does. Nope that Flashlight was most likely staging
 
coloradokares said:
Cause it was cleaner than a hounds tooth. Not a single trace of a print on it or the batteries inside it. Do you glove yourself and wipe down batteries before inserting them so that even manufacturing workers prints are not on them? flashights that have ever been used are going to have prints. Cause the humanbeing that used it does. Nope that Flashlight was most likely staging

coloradokares,

Nope that Flashlight was most likely staging

elementary dear Watson?

So why remove the flashlight from the crime-scene?


.
 
UKGuy said:
coloradokares,



elementary dear Watson?

So why remove the flashlight from the crime-scene?


.
Do we know that it was? Or was it really not staging . Just wiped clean to make sure no one thought it was used to hurt JonBenet......then they placed it back where they normally did when they got back upstairs?
 
UKGuy said:
coloradokares,



elementary dear Watson?

So why remove the flashlight from the crime-scene?


.
Wouldn't removing it have been easier for the Ramsey's....I mean, what if they missed a print or two??? They left it there on purpose....as a prop.
 
philamena said:
But wouldn't that very thing, the blood between the skull and the scalp, cause a bruise? TIA
I don't think so, but it would account for the extensive scalp hemorrhage, imo.


-Tea
 
Ames said:
Have you ever been frantic...and screamed? Yes, your voice is a bit higher pitched than normal...that's why I think it was Patsy.
'


Yep,esp when upset,I agree.
 
UKGuy said:
JMO8778,

Answering this one might help explain what occurred.

But why do you whack your six-year old daughter on the head with a flashlight, unless you really mean to kill her.

Using the flashlight is not quite the same as a slap or a punch etc, there was such force used her skull was caved in, and that was accidental?


.
I totally agree,UK.It was NO accident.Someone wanted her dead,and made sure she was.I don't think she was 'accidently' slammed into something.That hole in her head and the sheer length of the fracture were done on purpose,IMO.

Could those of you who think this was an accident..please go back and look at the pic of JB's skull...that long fracture,and esp that hole in her skull...she wasn't slammed into something accidently.She was hit intentionally and forcefully,so as to render her DEAD.

as always,JMO-just my opinion.
 
JMO8778 said:
I totally agree,UK.It was NO accident.Someone wanted her dead,and made sure she was.I don't think she was 'accidently' slammed into something.That hole in her head and the sheer length of the fracture were done on purpose,IMO.

Could those of you who think this was an accident..please go back and look at the pic of JB's skull...that long fracture,and esp that hole in her skull...she wasn't slammed into something accidently.She was hit intentionally and forcefully,so as to render her DEAD.

as always,JMO-just my opinion.
She could have been slammed into something, knocked unconscious....with her faint heartbeat, Patsy thought she was dead.....she shook her...when she couldn't revive her, Patsy screamed...alerting John. The coverup began....could JB possibly have been hit again (this time cause the HOLE in the skull) as part of the staging...after the strangulation. So, it could have went like this....non-fatal head wound, strangulation, hole in the skull head wound.
 
Ames said:
She could have been slammed into something, knocked unconscious....with her faint heartbeat, Patsy thought she was dead.....she shook her...when she couldn't revive her, Patsy screamed...alerting John. The coverup began....could JB possibly have been hit again (this time cause the HOLE in the skull) as part of the staging...after the strangulation. So, it could have went like this....non-fatal head wound, strangulation, hole in the skull head wound.
true,I thought about that,but then,why rearrange her hair so as to appear to be hiding it? In trying to take into consideration all possible scenerios,I can't discount that she may have been intentionally killed all along,directly,with no prior accident.
 
JMO8778 said:
true,I thought about that,but then,why rearrange her hair so as to appear to be hiding it? In trying to take into consideration all possible scenerios,I can't discount that she may have been intentionally killed all along,directly,with no prior accident.
Having said that do you believe it was premeditated or brought on by rage of the moment.
 
Ames said:
She could have been slammed into something, knocked unconscious....with her faint heartbeat, Patsy thought she was dead.....she shook her...when she couldn't revive her, Patsy screamed...alerting John. The coverup began....could JB possibly have been hit again (this time cause the HOLE in the skull) as part of the staging...after the strangulation. So, it could have went like this....non-fatal head wound, strangulation, hole in the skull head wound.
She is tiny. She could have been thrown against the bathtub or the sink and yes that could do that to her skull.
 
Solace said:
She is tiny. She could have been thrown against the bathtub or the sink and yes that could do that to her skull.
Something I thought about across the years is the Tub faucet ... If her little head came in contact with that..... Could that do it? Through a major shove or a flinging back type of action .....Or shudder . Her head taken and intentionally with force driven into it. I am only speculating now. Just thinking Patsy shower/tub whatever was not in repair for some reason that morning. I am just tossing ideas of what could have broke the skull in that pattern.
 
coloradokares said:
Something I thought about across the years is the Tub faucet ... If her little head came in contact with that..... Could that do it? Through a major shove or a flinging back type of action .....Or shudder . Her head taken and intentionally with force driven into it. I am only speculating now. Just thinking Patsy shower/tub whatever was not in repair for some reason that morning. I am just tossing ideas of what could have broke the skull in that pattern.
Colorado. I know this is not a popular theory right now. But a child this small when thrown with force could certainly have their head cracked, especially if thrown against a marble bathtub.
 
Solace said:
Colorado. I know this is not a popular theory right now. But a child this small when thrown with force could certainly have their head cracked, especially if thrown against a marble bathtub.
I have no problem with the crack in her head coming from a bathtub. Its the area there was a hole that I find .......troublesome, for lack of better wording. It could have been either. Wouldn't you love to have a time machine and go back and look at everything in that house for something that could have done that in one blow or force induced fall.
 
coloradokares said:
I have no problem with the crack in her head coming from a bathtub. Its the area there was a hole that I find .......troublesome, for lack of better wording. It could have been either. Wouldn't you love to have a time machine and go back and look at everything in that house for something that could have done that in one blow or force induced fall.
Yes I would Colorado. I would pick you up on the way and we could walk over to the Ramseys and tell them we were there to inspect and please step aside.
 
Solace said:
Yes I would Colorado. I would pick you up on the way and we could walk over to the Ramseys and tell them we were there to inspect and please step aside.
My thought is they got rid of hid and otherwise set aside and deep sixed what did it till Aunty Pam could go get their funeral clothes. or If I am not mistaken didn't their airline pilot also carry out a box..Where did I read that..I withdraw till I can substantiate it. But for some reason in my mind. I think the pilot at one point picked up a box. I know I am not daydreaming or idly spreading rumor. I just can't think where I read that. So as long as we are time traveling can we hang about till Anty Pam gets the funeral clothes and make sure we inspect that box as well?
 
coloradokares said:
I have no problem with the crack in her head coming from a bathtub. Its the area there was a hole that I find .......troublesome, for lack of better wording. It could have been either. Wouldn't you love to have a time machine and go back and look at everything in that house for something that could have done that in one blow or force induced fall.
If you had that time machine, would you set it for Dec. 24th and wait and watch it all unfold..from the Fleet's party to the very end..? Just to be invisible and follow JonBenet's every step.
 
coloradokares said:
My thought is they got rid of hid and otherwise set aside and deep sixed what did it till Aunty Pam could go get their funeral clothes. or If I am not mistaken didn't their airline pilot also carry out a box..Where did I read that..I withdraw till I can substantiate it. But for some reason in my mind. I think the pilot at one point picked up a box. I know I am not daydreaming or idly spreading rumor. I just can't think where I read that. So as long as we are time traveling can we hang about till Anty Pam gets the funeral clothes and make sure we inspect that box as well?
Ames: One almost needs a valium reading about this case. They just let her walk in take whatever she wanted. This family is guilty from the inside out.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
184
Guests online
931
Total visitors
1,115

Forum statistics

Threads
626,133
Messages
18,521,186
Members
240,944
Latest member
detphantom
Back
Top