Why is everyone so sure that this could not be a rage "accident". It happens all the time. Someone gets so angry they do something they regret and wish they hadn't for the rest of their lives. Why does this have to be planned? I understand where you are all coming from that this head wound is so bad that it looks intentional and I agree; it is intentional at that moment, but why cannot it not be a rage "accident". Patsy said "we did not mean for this to happen".Veronica10 said:You are right, it was no accident. Patsy totally intended to whack her over the head...she was pissed off. Rage overcame her in that moment..I think the word accident is used because PR did not intend for her to die. But she totally meant to whack her over the head.
I was talking to someone about this case last night. I said well maybe she was hit over the head with the flashlight, but if that is the case, then it is not an accident. I mean the person doing this has to know it will kill her. To which the person replied, why? One could be so angry that they do not realize the force they are using at the time and they kill her. Their anger overtakes. Isn't that called temporary insanity or the like. Yes, it is complete disregard, but it does not mean that they intended to kill her at that moment, they were blinded by rage?
This is not possible????/