Hey everyone. Sorry for any confusion or inconvenience--couldn't get here before now and I was reading the morning paper but put up the link for perusal...Front page headline and photo, by the way.
Observations (fwiw):
1) Yes, clearly seems a routine missing person visit.
2) Should we assume that the article mis-reported all of the significant times? According to the article, the officer stated that C. Reported last seeing Scott at about 5PM Feb 9 -- and then reports C. telling him, at that time, that "she gave him a ride to Keanae to take him back to his vehicle and after doing that, they both went on their way" (This would blow even bigger holes in C.'s ever-morphing narrative.)
The article also explains, "family members have reported last seeing Scott at about 10pm that day at her sister's home in Haiku". This in contradiction to what the family has already reported, so it does put into question today's reporting. So for now, consider that part an error. But, if C.'s early morning statement is correctly reported, these are huge time discrepancies and risky exposure and to try to throw it out would seem like a desperation move by Defense.