According to Tammy, once the crime scene tape came down, Dan did "what any other Dad would do" and started searching for clues.
Don't get me wrong...I understand the concept of using a quad when you're trying to cover a lot of ground. I completely get that. However, the area of Maiden Lane is NOT that big. Also, you can see how dense that area is with trees. Sure, you could take a quad from Arbutus down into Maiden Lane (what....50/100ft?) but there is no way you'd actually be able to efficiently "search" for someone in that area with a quad. The trees are growing extremely close together, and with the extreme vegetation you'd never be able to get a quad through there...or you'd be completely wasting time trying to. It just makes more sense, if you're trying to look for clues to be on foot...down close to the ground, looking for pieces of fabric possibly torn from clothing, or any other sort of small evidence.
Now, if you're riding through a field or a much larger wooded area with less density of tree growth, it makes perfect sense to use a quad to cover a large amount of ground in a small time.
You can probably search the entire area of Maiden Lane on your hands and knees in less than 2 hours.
I guess because we have quads, I know how difficult they are to naviagate. They are at least 3 feet wide, have HORRIBLE turning radiuses, and are just a pain in the



to navigate in tight quarters. They are made for open throttle riding, jumping, etc...they aren't made to turn easily, hence the width in comparison to the length to prevent turnovers.
Overall, my point is just that it's probably the LEAST effective way to actually search for someone/anything in a dense area.
However, I don't fault him for bringing it if he thought they were going to have to be searching much larger areas for the girls.