This is a news article from right after Jake went missing.
Update: Search continues for missing La Porte City teen with autism
His family says he walked to Wolf Creek around 8:45 p.m. Saturday and never came home. He's 5'6'' and was last seen wearing a brown zip-up sweater, dark sweats and cowboy boots.
Jake's mother tells KWWL her son has walked to Wolf Creek in the past, but never alone. She said after he was gone for more than a half an hour when she new something was terribly wrong.
"He just asked if he could go down to the creek and my husband told him the directions and that's the last time that I seen him," said Megan Neiswonger, Jake's Mother.
Thank you for posting this, Nikki732002.
Two things I didn’t realize before:
1. “Jake's mother tells KWWL her son has walked to Wolf Creek in the past, but never alone.“
2. ”He just asked if he could go down to the creek and my husband told him the directions”
Both BBM for emphasis
The thing I have always had a difficult time understanding about Jake’s case has been the fact that he was allowed to go down to the creek at 8:45pm or 9pm, as has also been reported.
According to the actual weather report for Apr. 7, at 9 pm, the temperature was about 30 F. Sunset was at 7:41 pm, civil twilight (“”Civil twilight is the brightest form of twilight. There is enough natural sunlight during this period that artificial light may not be required to carry out outdoor activities“) at 8:09 pm, and nautical twilight was at (“this [nautical] twilight period is less bright than civil twilight and artificial light is generally required for outdoor activities”) at 8:43 pm.
Vinton-Veterans Memorial, IA History | Weather Underground
And then to realize that Jake had never walked there by himself, and thus his step-dad even felt the need to give him the directions (“a few short blocks from his home”), I am further at a loss to understand why this had to happen.
It is an incredibly sad situation all around.
So am I, IMHO, but I sounded like I was parent bashing (or step parent bashing) whenever I wrote it and that wasn't necessarily my intention. You have a much better way with words.
I strongly suspect foul play.
My opinion about this has changed in the last weeks, I thought about foul play as well, but his poor eyesight and balance problems considered, an accident and then drowning is the most likely cause of his death. As far as I understand they are still investigating though.
I strongly suspect foul play.
I'm all over the place in terms of my opinion of this case however, while yes, the likelihood of an accident appears to far out weigh the other options, it is more the circumstances of him being up there in first place and why at that time, how he got there, the fact he needed directions, who allowed him to go there at that time that has me questioning whether or not this was accident. As opposed to what is more likely to happen in that location.
Am I making any sense? .... Coffee pleaseeee
I've pictured an array of scenarios that involve foul play, too - however, it's entirely possible that it was just an accident. I agree with @AnaPisces. A lot doesn't added up, in my opinion.
Agree.When I look at the facts thus far, as I know them; there are a number of perhaps red flags as to the nature of the situation. First of all I believe that I had seen on perhaps the first TV interview, that the mother stated, "you can listen to your music. We can argue like normal teenager and mom." This to me sounds almost apologetic, as if there had been an argument /altercation; vs. I'm just going to skip on down to the creek now...
If my 20 year old son- (who graduated with a "normal" diploma and can drive) wanted to go for a walk or even my husband in an identical situation, these would be my concerns:
Time- he went for a walk in the dark
Clothing- he was wearing dark clothing.
Clothing- he did NOT have on any reflective components to his clothing.
weather- he was going for a walk when the temperature was rather cold.
Anticipated weather- snow storm in the immediate forecast.
He was not wearing his glasses- would seem a rather obvious issue. (My son/husband wears glasses too.)
Although he had been there before- this was his first time going there alone.
He needed directions from his dad to get there.
He was going to a rather large- (from the pictures I saw) source of water.
The source of water was a moving creek/river.
Given the time of year, the water would be cold.
I dont know if Jake could swim- My son can swim REALLY well- I'd still say NO.
It is an easy argument to make that people with autism are drawn to water- significant research has been done in re: people with autism drowning. It would appear as if this could be almost "too easy"- of a missing person who accidentally drown situation.
Had this been my son/husband - I would have said an emphatic "NO" at ANY of the junctures listed above. Had he ABSOLUTELY insisted that he was going to go- I would have been perhaps 20 feet behind him- he wouldn't see me if it were that time of night- and of course totally dark this time of year.
Again, I DO NOT KNOW the teen NOR his parents. My concerns only come from the point of a mother of 2 young males with autism- one higher functioning than Jake- and someone who has spoken to first responders re: handling situations such as this.
I think I understand, Ana. It wasn't like the front door was accidentally left open and he wandered off.