D
Deleted member 718
Guest
Perhaps a silly question but what if the victims had locked their bedroom doors? Especially X having E as an overnight guest.
In the Manson case, Doris Day’s son, Terry Melcher, a music producer who turned Manson down was the target at Ciello Drive. Manson didn’t know Melcher had moved out. The La Bianca muders the next night did target a random house, however.I mean the house was the target like the Manson case. So if you don't live there, your home won't be attacked. I'm not saying that's what happened but it's possible, IMO. The house could have been the target and for some reason the surviving roommates were unreachable. Locked door?
Talking to the press IS part of their job, so they are doing their job when talking to the press. Talking to the press can help the investigation.All I know is that every minute they spend talking to the press, they are not doing their job. Imo.
Locked doors, interruption, or possibly the killer had only viewed the house from the back where it's not obvious that there is a first floor. Interestingly, in both the Sharon Tate and the Omega Chi cases there were survivors that went untouched.I mean the house was the target like the Manson case. So if you don't live there, your home won't be attacked. I'm not saying that's what happened but it's possible, IMO. The house could have been the target and for some reason the surviving roommates were unreachable. Locked door?
I was writing today along the same lines. Or he pretend that he was delivery man, searching around in the house to find the person 'who made the order'. A delivery man who will be ready to apologise that he got the wrong address and to walk away if the housemates start being suspicious.Do you think the killer had an excuse to be at the property in case he got discovered before he could kill? What would an excuse be? Hey your dog got out so I returned it? or hey I am here to do some repairs? Did the landlord use a property management company for this property?
Regarding what surviving RM's may have, given location of BRs in relation to BRs abobe, been able to hear of the murders - there may have been little to hear if killer's attacks were initiated with slashing of throats, which I'd think is likely.The following Johnny Law youtube was originally posted by Mayboy1998 earlier today but because it was not a podcast host we were familiar with and we did not have time to view it in its entirety, it was removed. Having now had time to view it, it is being approved on a one-time basis because it does seem to provide an excellent analysis of the layout of the house, where individuals may have been sleeping, and it speaks to the location of the red liquid in relation to the overall layout of the house.
not silly, it's a pretty important question. were the surviving roommates spared only because they locked their doors? or would they have been spared regardless?Perhaps a silly question but what if the victims had locked their bedroom doors? Especially X having E as an overnight guest.
Yes, I’ve gone back and forth w this. The only reason I think maybe no is because it seems none of the closets had doors! At least on the Zillow pics. Maybe they were added.. not sure.If it hasn't been ruled out by LE then it is possible but that would be taking a huge risk. It was a known place for parties etc. If the person had laid in wait and all of a sudden the rooomates brought people home for drinks/a party and everything else that goes with that then that person would then leave themselves in a seriously compromising and dangerous position.
A friendly dog will have zero social anxiety and just be excited to see everyone. Some large dogs are confident, love everyone and bark very rarely. But with all the action and moving around that night you got figure if the dog saw it all happen then the dog likely would have interpreted the situation as play time so still surprised the dog didn't interfere with the killer or killers.
Or maybe the killer got tired after going all out on the first victim and did the minimum attack on the others. Targeted is a vague word. Unless you know the killers motive you do not know if anyone else is in danger or not. I have posted numerous times about a random break in and stabbing hear me. Perp just wanted to kill someone. Jiggled doorknobs till he found an unlocked house. He didn't know the occupants or the house. Totally random and targeted because of his motive. Imo..Agree but this is a very different crime. I believe we will come to be given evidence that proves one person was the target. Perhaps there are indicators of this already by each persons wounds. E.g. if one person had multiple facial stab wounds and the others didn’t, LE could quickly determine that this person was likely the target.
I don't think it is silly. Maybe this perp has a record or a history of other crimes and can bust a lock too?Perhaps a silly question but what if the victims had locked their bedroom doors? Especially X having E as an overnight guest.
Can I ask you your opinion on something? The fire chief said the police were first to arrive on scene, which makes sense. They are a volunteer fire department and the two times I’ve had to call an ambulance, police showed up first, I’m assuming because they’re already patrol on the area. The fire chief said that the first responders from the fire and EMS didn’t go inside or transport anyone. I’m assuming because police knew it was a crime scene, the victims were beyond saving and they didn’t want them to contaminate the crime scene.I agree. I can certainly understand the frustration of friends and family of the victims. We are starting to see more and more criticism of law enforcement on this case. People want answers.
A few things to consider when we discuss the early days of the investigation; what was said, what was done, was the crime scene compromised, etc.:
When LE are dispatched to a scene, they basically arrive with a blank slate. They are responding to the information given by the 911 caller. This is why the call is so important. There would certainly be a different approach to, “My roommate is unconscious.” as opposed to “My roommate is locked in the bedroom and there is blood everywhere.” The number 1 priority for LE is always preservation of life. Did an officer approach one of the victims to see if he could get a pulse? It’s very possible. In doing so did he step in some blood or other evidence? Maybe. Does that make him useless or stupid? I don’t think so. If your loved one was laying on the bed unconscious wouldn’t you want them to be checked, just in case?
Now we have LE’s earliest statements. When you arrive on scene, you use your training and experience to make a preliminary assessment of what happened. A patrol officer in this situation would immediately call a supervisor and detectives to the scene. Within a short time the word has gotten out, you have 4 dead students, people are alarmed. You have to say something so you make a statement releasing basic facts and present your earliest theory of what you think happened. After a vicious quadruple homicide you can’t go out and say “No comment.” so you tell them your best theory based on what you know at the time.
An investigation is a fluid journey taking twists and turns as evidence is gathered, suspects are ruled out, and new information comes to light.
What is taking so long? These cops must be incompetent.
Sure, if you go to a scene in a pristine environment with a single victim and find dna and fingerprints and know there has been a recent bad divorce and the ex’s cellphone was at the home at the time of the homicide and he has no alibi, you might get a quick solve. Or what if you arrive at the scene and a suspect is standing over a dead body with the proverbial smoking gun?
But what if you go into a fairly large home, that is known to be a gathering spot and it is filled with red cups and party remnants and you have four victims spread out over two floors, and there’s dna but it doesn’t match anyone and you have to wait for all that digital data to come back and you start the labor intensive task of identifying friends, acquaintance, stalkers, exes and most of these people have left the area due to the Thanksgiving holiday or just because they are scared it could happen to them? Will that take some time? You betcha.
And you can also believe that these LE officers are working their butts off to identify this killer because they never ever want to have to respond to a scene like this one ever again.
I think the killer is a small man, juvenile or a woman. I think this because the killer only felt comfortable killing folks that were asleep. They needed the element of surprise to do it. The reason the the downstairs folks were not killed is because they were awake. Then the killer fled so they would not get caught once the downstairs folks were awakened. This killer does not like locked doors and does not like a conscious victim.
I thought the bottom floor had a keypad lock which would preclude him from entering there either way, unless he had the code (which I doubt he did). But maybe I misread that.Very fair point but my only thought on that one that would support he did is he knew to enter through the sliding glass door which was in close proximity to KG/MM vs. entering on the ground floor where the two surviving roommates were. This is under the assumption that KG or MM were the target.
Also, the layout of the home with detailed floor plans are very easily accessible on real estate sites and online with high-resolution pictures of each of the rooms. So even if the killer had only been in there once he would have a mental picture that could be verified by using sites like MLS.
Are you talking about after they got home? I feel that the three girls were extremely close and probably never locked their doors. So it probably wasn't even a thought.Perhaps a silly question but what if the victims had locked their bedroom doors? Especially X having E as an overnight guest.