Eileen730
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2010
- Messages
- 20,232
- Reaction score
- 313
To carry out a re-enactment one needs to know exactly what happened to the point in focus.
People involved have to be telling the 100% truth.
Timelines need to be accurate.
Since day 1 this case has had none of the above. No agreement on who was doing what and when. A distinct impression (for me) that not everything is known. The timeline has changed more times than I've had hot dinners.
In this case, for me, a re-enactment is not going to benefit anyone - except the defence.
This will be very telling IMO because they can compare the original statement with this review enactment