Found Deceased ID - Joshua Vallow, 7, Tylee Ryan, 16, Tammy Daybell, 49, Charles Vallow, 62, Oct 2019 *Arrests* #64

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #921
Sounds like they're just trying to make their jobs easier.
 
  • #922
Does anyone know IF Lori is having a status/competency report hearing on Monday, 3/7/22?

@montegrl - ?? TIA! :)
 
  • #923
Does anyone know IF Lori is having a status/competency report hearing on Monday, 3/7/22?

@montegrl - ?? TIA! :)

The Mycourt portal has been down for several days at this point so the general public doesn't have any access. I will look for other ways to find out, maybe Judge Boyce's schedule is posted somewhere. Sorry @Niner!
 
  • #924
The Mycourt portal has been down for several days at this point so the general public doesn't have any access. I will look for other ways to find out, maybe Judge Boyce's schedule is posted somewhere. Sorry @Niner!

Oh - no need to be sorry - not your fault. I will await your answer if you find one! Thanks! :)
 
  • #925
That doesn't look like justice from where I'm sitting.

"Lengthy", I agree.

I've lost faith in them. Pathetic! IMO
I lost faith in them a long, long time ago.
 
  • #926
Does anyone know IF Lori is having a status/competency report hearing on Monday, 3/7/22?

@montegrl - ?? TIA! :)
I believe there were more sealed documents added to her file today. I suspect her (successfully feigning) incompetance status will remain unchanged, though at some point they’ll proceed to make the designation permanent.

Unless they declare her competent poor Chad will be heading off to trial as the sole defendant, which may or may not benefit him. Does anyone know if if an incompetant person can still be called as a trial witness?
 
  • #927
Justin Lum:
Log in or sign up to view

COMPETENCY REPORTS SEALED: Judge Steven Boyce signs order sealing Department of Health competency reports regarding Lori Vallow. The reports from two doctors have been submitted to the Court.
 
  • #928
That doesn't look like justice from where I'm sitting.

"Lengthy", I agree.

I've lost faith in them. Pathetic! IMO

I don't think they could prove to a jury's satisfaction that anybody but Alex Cox was involved. There are certainly highly suggestive behaviors, especially regarding the burner phone, but that's not proof.
 
  • #929
Justin Lum:
Log in or sign up to view

COMPETENCY REPORTS SEALED: Judge Steven Boyce signs order sealing Department of Health competency reports regarding Lori Vallow. The reports from two doctors have been submitted to the Court.

Damn...Facebook people are crazy. I can't even read the comments
 
Last edited:
  • #930
New HTC live with Lori Hellis:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

She thinks (speculates) that Lori and Chad are allowed to receive letters from each other in jail. That way they could stay on the same page when it comes to their beliefs. LH isn't convinced that Chad will throw her under the bus at the trial.

In regard to the failure to prosecute Chad for the attempt on BB, LH stated that it's a jurisdiction issue. In order to charge someone with a crime in Arizona, it should be provable that at least a portion of the criminal act occurred within the state, for which apparently Chad's text messages sent from Idaho didn't qualify.
 
Last edited:
  • #931
  • #932
I don't think they could prove to a jury's satisfaction that anybody but Alex Cox was involved. There are certainly highly suggestive behaviors, especially regarding the burner phone, but that's not proof.

Exactly. No such crime as “Felony Answering the Phone When a Criminal Calls You on a Burner Several Times Before, During. and After Trying to Kill Someone, or Maybe Just Scare Him, We Don’t Know.”
 
  • #933
JP's reply to State's supplement and disclosure for the State's motion for the court to allow additional evidence (15 pages):

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/case/CR22211623/030222 Reply to States Supplement.pdf

Excerpt:

The Supplement ignores and misconstrues the relevant law, fails to provide the information necessary to compare the costs of a trial in Ada County to a trial in Fremont County, inflates cost estimates through the State’s own costly decisions, and fails to even acknowledge Mr. Daybell’s fundamental constitutional rights that would be prejudiced by transporting a jury from Ada County.

Apart from the cost debate, JP argues that transporting the jury would result in reducing the jury pool and sequestering it would put pressure on the jurors, which would both be prejudicial for Chad.
 
Last edited:
  • #934
I'm just glad AC was such a bad shot, otherwise more people may have been killed.

JMO
 
  • #935
Exactly. No such crime as “Felony Answering the Phone When a Criminal Calls You on a Burner Several Times Before, During. and After Trying to Kill Someone, or Maybe Just Scare Him, We Don’t Know.”

I’m beginning to think I shouldn’t have posted something so flippant as the above. Sorry.
 
  • #936
I’m beginning to think I shouldn’t have posted something so flippant as the above. Sorry.
I think it sums up this insanity perfectly
 
  • #937
I’m beginning to think I shouldn’t have posted something so flippant as the above. Sorry.
I'm wondering if it would make a difference if those were texts instead of calls. Lori Hellis said yesterday that even if it could be proven that MBP gave BB's new address to Lori & co. and told them to go get him, that would still not be enough for charging her. She would have to do more "in furtherance of the crime".
 
  • #938
New HTC live with Lori Hellis:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

She thinks (speculates) that Lori and Chad are allowed to receive letters from each other in jail. That way they could stay on the same page when it comes to their beliefs. LH isn't convinced that Chad will throw her under the bus at the trial.

In regard to the failure to prosecute Chad for the attempt on BB, LH stated that it's a jurisdiction issue. In order to charge someone with a crime in Arizona, it should be provable that at least a portion of the criminal act occurred within the state, for which apparently Chad's text messages sent from Idaho didn't qualify.

Thanks, that's interesting. Could Idaho charge him, then? Or does that make it a Federal crime?
 
  • #939
  • #940
Exactly. No such crime as “Felony Answering the Phone When a Criminal Calls You on a Burner Several Times Before, During. and After Trying to Kill Someone, or Maybe Just Scare Him, We Don’t Know.”

"Maybe they were making plans to meet for supper later"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
104
Guests online
3,441
Total visitors
3,545

Forum statistics

Threads
633,028
Messages
18,635,168
Members
243,380
Latest member
definds
Back
Top