- Joined
- Oct 3, 2019
- Messages
- 1,781
- Reaction score
- 14,367
As @MTW2011 reported upthread, in some previous cases Archibald has insisted his client’s receive their right to a speedy trial. Here the ramifications are particularly interesting since Chad waived his and has already had a trial date set 3 months later than the State’s “speedy trial” deadline for Lori. Requiring JP to move Chad’s up to meet Lori’s trial date cuts the trial prep time he’d have left by a full third. If Prior objects to moving it up (and I expect he will) but is forced to move it up anyway I’d think there would be concern Chad would have grounds for appeal if found guilty.
SBM- Can't really argue that it wasn't enough time. JP already stated his preference would be to start in Oct. 2022 and lost that. The state wanted 97 more years to prepare. He felt he's had enough time (and the state) to prepare and that CD deserved the opportunity to present his case and not wait even longer. He even commented in regards to JA wanting 1-2 years that it was 10 months out (if he successfully got the Oct. trial date) and that was more than sufficient time to prepare for this case.
See 7:38 for preference of Oct. start date
Last edited: