LHS
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2019
- Messages
- 223
- Reaction score
- 2,786
I think the church is relevant to the discussion because it appears to be what brought them together. Chad writes books and sells them primarily to LDS members and that is how the two met I believe, as Lori got into his books. They then began appearing/public speaking at the PAP gatherings along with other well known LDS members. It is not something that can be discounted as it is/was a big part of their lives and so is intertwined IMO.
The beliefs of LDS people have brought together MILLIONS of couples. Very very few of them behave like this. What sets these two apart is what should be the issue. They aren't your average LDS couple in any way imaginable. LDS people look to marry other LDS people because it's FAR easier. And because you cannot be sealed in the temple unless both parties are LDS and worthy to do so.
MOO - Yes it's the springboard to their wacky beliefs. Yes it has relevance, but it's not ONLY the LDS beliefs that drive these two. I'm actively LDS, and I'm nothing like either one of them.
This has really got me wondering now. I know only one Mormon amongst our many relations and that person is into genealogy to track down older relatives who have mostly deceased. Is that the reason so they can be baptised in the LDS religion? All other relatives AFAIK are not LDS and are a mix of Roman Catholic or Protestant. So if those dead relatives get baptized LDS after there death, unknown to us, what about their Catholic or Protestant baptism/communion when they were alive? This seems wrong to me TBH.
So much for not discussing the church but I don't really think that will be possible on this thread, no matter how hard we try. If posters don't want to see it then there is the good old scroll and roll.
This has been explained before, but I will do so again for clarification. I came here to clarify what is mainstream LDS beliefs, and what is not. This case has a lot of tangled up beliefs.
The baptisms performed are not forced upon anyone. We believe strongly in agency and the ability to choose. They are an OPTION. This means that we believe they may choose to accept them or reject them and stick with their former beliefs.
I mentioned in my explanation of this practice that I know there has been some controversy about them baptizing groups of dead people, I think (but could be remembering wrong) that they were people killed in the holocaust. While the focus is largely on relatives for which genealogy has been done, I believe they have also done this for historically significant figures like the founding fathers and presidents of the US. I think I've even heard Hitler mentioned which makes me wonder if this means he'll dodge hell in Mormon belief if he accepts the baptism.
The Mormon leaders (don't remember if past, like Joseph Smith/Brigham Young) or more recent have said that the second coming can't happen until this has been done for everyone who has ever lived and never had the chance to become a Mormon while on earth.
My feeling is that while I get people objecting to "their people" being baptized in proxy, if they don't believe in Mormonism, why does it matter?
The LDS church has prohibited members from baptizing holocaust victims because this is what their families have requested. It was done out of respect. Now and then someone makes a mistake and doesn't know about that particular instruction, and people are understandably upset.
Hitler is on the "no go" list. That's one for God to deal with. Same for Gov. Boggs who issued the extermination order in Missouri (making it legal to kill LDS people there).
No LDS leader has said the 2nd coming can't happen till all temple work is done. That's completely impossible as there are many generations of people all over the world with no records. We actually believe temple work is a HUGE part of the period of time known as the Millennium AFTER Christ returns.