Found Deceased ID - Joshua Vallow, 7, & Tylee Ryan, 17, Rexburg, Sept 2019 *mom arrested* #29

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #961
Yes, all prisoners are begging to be let out... even Michael Avenatti. In the latter case, even though he is a convicted felon who stole millions from clients, he never committed violence (one alleged DV that wasn't prosecuted) or killed anyone. Still, he faces two more high profile felony court trials and his wishes are not likely to come true.

So, in example, while many prisoners are being let out, it's supposed to be for particularly vulnerable, elderly, or non-violent and misdemeanor type of cases. Lori shouldn't qualify, unless perhaps she produces the kids. Every jurisdiction seems to be making their own rules tho. I doubt this angle will fly. But mud / wall / see if sticks. In the meantime it puts the court and attendees at risk as everyone has to show up for the hearing.
I know it may seem funny but they are considering letting prisoners out in the UK because of prison officers self isolating at home etc.
 
  • #962
It could come from Kay. I see a lot of my search history on Amazon. Jmo

I can easily see 150 or so of the last items I've browsed (there might be more, I didn't bother to look) and every item I've purchased for 17 years. Once Kay accessed Charles' Amazon account, she could have had access to a LOT of information about Lori's interests and purchases.
 
  • #963
dbm - misread post
 
  • #964
It could come from Kay. I see a lot of my search history on Amazon. Jmo
I am sure LE has all of her search history, I think the ring was a bone they threw out to keep interest and maybe piss off all or some of those involved or supporters into turning. I don't think all the discovery for her current charges is all they have either. When they are ready to charge for murder there will be more imo. I really hope they charge Chad soon, very upsetting these kids are missing......I am holding out hope that LE has a lot more. Imo venting, thanks.
 
  • #965
My opinion leans towards your thoughts here:

"I do think something in the evidence that was handed over during the initial discovery will be the "new facts", but at the same time, I think Mr. Means is looking for ways to get her off on some technicality. I can't think of one thing that would make her look like she is less of a risk or deserves her bail to be reduced."

Maybe he's going back to this exceeds "standard bail schedules" (particularly when her bail wasn't reduced in Hawaii). Or maybe this doesn't play a part in the legal argument now? Heck, I dunno... I'm just guessing.

Unless LV has some sort of underlying condition that makes her more susceptible to the virus... I can't imagine COVID-19 would be the new facts that "recently came to light".

All JMO (and guesses)
:confused:
She's preggers too?
 
  • #966
Exactly. Her lawyer's defense will be SODDI (Some Other Dude Did It) all the way. She will blame her accusers for JJ and Tylee being missing. Any witnesses put on the stand to tell about Lori's "zombie" beliefs the lawyer will attempt to discredit the witness rather than arguing against what the witness says. These poor family members who have already suffered for months not knowing where JJ and Tylee are will be accused of all manner of false accusations. We should brace ourselves for more disgusting lies with no hard evidence coming from the defense. It's all she has. She can't argue against the charges by producing the kids or presenting positive evidence of her innocence, because if she could do that she wouldn't still be sitting in jail. MOO.
i do have some confidence in LE though. I think they sized her up pretty quickly, and that is why we just do not get many leaks. They are probably (hopefully) have lots of data that will directly contradict her attempts to lie.'
Geeezzz.....as I write this I still worry about what I just wrote.
 
  • #967
What an Amazon order reveals about Lori Daybell's wedding ring | East Idaho News
What an Amazon order reveals about Lori Daybell’s wedding ring
amazon-order.jpg

I feel so sorry for KVW finding this out and this was a week before the paintball attack on the 9th and Tammy's death on the 19th. Despicable.
 
  • #968
I can easily see 150 or so of the last items I've browsed (there might be more, I didn't bother to look) and every item I've purchased for 17 years. Once Kay accessed Charles' Amazon account, she could have had access to a LOT of information about Lori's interests and purchases.
But did she have access to his Amazon account or just emails? I only recall emails from Amazon.
 
  • #969
We don't know when the wedding dress was ordered. According to the EIN article search history shows that someone was searching for wedding dresses on Oct 3, a day after the ring purchase.

ETA: How did Lori and Chad knew that Kay and Larry were informed about the purchase(s)? The source given in the article is someone "close to the investigation".
I think this ring was the Amazon purchase that alerted KVW to Lori's new address and thus enabled the welfare check request. MOO.
 
  • #970
But did she have access to his Amazon account or just emails? I only recall emails from Amazon.
I am pretty sure she would have access to his accounts and cards. She is probably his executor IMO.
 
  • #971
If she does claim the CV 19 is an issue then the judge can remind her that she is translated and can't die. lol
True, but she could catch it and pass it on so would have to self isolate. Trouble is she can teleport so she won't get bail because of that IMO. She is a teleport risk.
:)
 
  • #972
I cant wait to see when they booked their wedding trip and associated details to Hawaii. Maybe more ordinary stuff. ;) jmo
Why didn't they just teleport? No electronic trail then.
 
  • #973
I am sure LE has all of her search history, I think the ring was a bone they threw out to keep interest and maybe piss off all or some of those involved or supporters into turning. I don't think all the discovery for her current charges is all they have either. When they are ready to charge for murder there will be more imo. I really hope they charge Chad soon, very upsetting these kids are missing......I am holding out hope that LE has a lot more. Imo venting, thanks.
It can't be a coincidence that this has come out the day after the new bail motion. LE playing tough.
 
  • #974
  • #975
So Lolo fires 2 of her 3 attorneys. Who’s her recent hire?
Not a new one but the third one she retained- Mr Means is the one who signed the new bail motion anyway.
 
  • #976
But did she have access to his Amazon account or just emails? I only recall emails from Amazon.

The order confirmation email from Amazon would have revealed at least "Charles Vallow, Rexburg, Idaho." But Kay said it was the Amazon purchase that led her to Lori's new address, so I'm inferring that, once Kay discovered the email, she also guessed the PW for Amazon.
 
  • #977
I think the wedding dress search is more damaging than the ring purchase. Jmo
 
  • #978
eastidahonews.com
ID locked down 21 days. Will this affect court? I'm sure it must.
 
  • #979
eastidahonews.com
ID locked down 21 days. Will this affect court? I'm sure it must.

Eric posted yesterday that court is limited on who can enter due to Covid19:

ET5AT3eU8AE83r1


Eric Grossarth on Twitter

Here's the governor's new order today:
Gov. Brad Little issues statewide 'stay-home' order, issues extreme emergency declaration | East Idaho News

I don't see courts mentioned but they might be still considered "essential" services right now and perhaps will continue with the limits that Eric posted yesterday? IDK. MOO.
 
  • #980
Exactly. Her lawyer's defense will be SODDI (Some Other Dude Did It) all the way. She will blame her accusers for JJ and Tylee being missing. Any witnesses put on the stand to tell about Lori's "zombie" beliefs the lawyer will attempt to discredit the witness rather than arguing against what the witness says. These poor family members who have already suffered for months not knowing where JJ and Tylee are will be accused of all manner of false accusations. We should brace ourselves for more disgusting lies with no hard evidence coming from the defense. It's all she has. She can't argue against the charges by producing the kids or presenting positive evidence of her innocence, because if she could do that she wouldn't still be sitting in jail. MOO.
I hate say this but the burden of proof is on the prosecution not the defense. So far no hard evidence has been shown that either child has been harmed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
107
Guests online
2,854
Total visitors
2,961

Forum statistics

Threads
632,544
Messages
18,628,270
Members
243,193
Latest member
bluemink
Back
Top