Let me get this straight:
JBR was found dead in her house, and there were three other occupants there the same night. They fall under an 'umbrella of suspicion' (not a criminal science term). They were under no umbrella until someone said they were. There was no 'smoking gun'.
And they are STILL under that "umbrella of suspicion", because YES, they lived in the house, Patsy couldn't be ruled out as the author of the RN, John's Israeli shirt fibers were found on the crotch area of JB's size 12 panties, and inside her crotch area, Patsy's clothes fibers from that night, were found ENTWINED in the garotte, and in the paint tray, the RN was written on THEIR note pad, using THEIR pen, the pineapple bowl had Patsy's fingerprints on it, along with Burkes. The flashlight, wiped clean of fingerprints...ALONG with the batteries...belonged to them....this is almost PAINFUL....need I go on?? NO WONDER they are still under an "umbrella of suspicion".
The 'umbrella of suspicion' evolves into a public presumption of guilt. The evidence is then construed to fit the RDI scenario. This requires, though, that the existing evidence be construed in ways that oppose their appearance.
Name one part of existing evidence that has been construed in ways that oppose their appearance.
RN author's penmanship and spelling appear to be bad. PR's writing and spelling are a lot better. RDI explains that PR nervously squared off the corners of letters she wrote with her left hand, while deliberately misspelling words.
Give me a BREAK!!!!!.....One word was misspelled. Oh but yet, attaché was spelled correctly??? Notice how attaché has the same French accent as JonBenét?? Gee...how "ironic". The word that was misspelled was done on purpose....as a disquise....to throw suspicion off of HER. 10 experts have said that Patsy IS the author of the RN....what more evidence do you need? I have two sisters that are ambidextrious like Patsy, the right hand does not write identical to the left.
RN author states there was a kidnapping. The crime appears to be a botched kidnapping turned murder, since JBR was found dead. RDI, having presumed guilt, declares the RN 'bogus' and 'fake'.
How many other kidnappers/murderers leave an almost three page RN? This is a murder turned kidnapping scheme, done by the parents. That's why NO intruder has ever been caught...Its so obvious...
JBR appears to have met an unusually violent end for a child murder victim. RDI, unable to find a motive for such a killing, declares the crime scene 'bogus' ,'faked', or 'staged'.
The authorities have said that the crime was "bogus", "faked" or "staged", too. So, its just not the RDI posters that think this.
In reality the evidence doesn't fit the RDI scenario, does it.
In reality the evidence doesn't ft the IDI scenario, does it? Because it sure as HECK fits the RDI scenario.