IL - Woman set on fire on Chicago L train, Chicago 18 November 2025

mickey2942

Well-Known Member
Websleuths Guardian
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
16,616
Reaction score
163,050
  • #1

A woman was set on fire by a man on the train. No information about the victim or perpetrator. Apparently they got into an argument, and the man poured flammable liquid on her and set her on fire.

It is unknown if he was a stranger or known to her.

Maybe we a whole new category for threads, "Crimes on Public Transportation", because it seems to be occurring frequently.
 
  • #2
  • #3
The woman set alight by a lunatic on a Chicago metro train is a 26-year-old who suffered burns to 60 percent of her body.

Bethany MaGee, 26, was doused in gasoline and set alight on the city's Blue Line on Monday night, but managed to flee the train and survive.

MaGee, from Upland in Indiana, is an animal lover and churchgoer, who is close to her parents Emily and Gregory, and two brothers Mark and John, her social media profiles revealed.

 
  • #4
Looking at his mugshots... this man needed serious, deep mental health treatment years and years ago. Letting him be 'free' has hurt other people and hurt him as well - hurt his chance to live a normal, productive life. While the old asylum system was obviously inhumane, is what we replaced it with (essentially nothing) any better?

JMO
 
  • #5
The woman set alight by a lunatic on a Chicago metro train is a 26-year-old who suffered burns to 60 percent of her body.

Bethany MaGee, 26, was doused in gasoline and set alight on the city's Blue Line on Monday night, but managed to flee the train and survive.

MaGee, from Upland in Indiana, is an animal lover and churchgoer, who is close to her parents Emily and Gregory, and two brothers Mark and John, her social media profiles revealed.

Oof, she's the same age as me, and with a very similar name, too. Really brings it home that things like this could happen to any one of us. I hope she pulls through, and that she has a strong support system (it sounds like she's got a close-knit family, which is good)
 
  • #6
  • #7
72 arrests and he was free? :mad:
 
  • #8

This is outrageous.

This is horrifying. Poor victim. I am scared to even post what my biggest fear is. Best of wishes for her.

On the other hand - what do we do with these mentally ill people whose psychosis is inborn + most likely, worsened by street drugs?

There are no long-term state hospitals. They have closed. Period. Wrong decision, but this is what we have.

The only place the police has control over is jail. But you can’t turn jails into cages, so the judges have no choices rather than let someone out.

There may be a way of letting aggressive but mentally ill people on least restrictive alternative, with monthly shots of antipsychotics. This could theoretically help, as most of these people are noncompliant with their meds. But, IM antipsychotics are expensive. However, letting such inmates out on regular visits of doctors/clinics + shots + drug tests is way cheaper than just making them wear ankle monitors. This case will cost the city of Chicago, and justly so.

About the judge: theoretically, she has to “ease” Cook county jail, which is not the greatest place. I’d first check that her principle of letting out the inmates was fair. “Fair” means that Lawrence Reed was among the sanest and least dangerous of the choices that she had during the last year. (It could have been so, or not at all.) I don’t care what her views are, but first and foremost, the judge has to be rational in her decisions. If she had safer inmates to let out, but chose this one, then now: 1) it costs a ruined life to the victim; 2) Reed will likely get life in federal prison which is no fun either; 3) it costs the city of Chicago. So the judges’ choice was irrational.

On the other hand, I can imagine people scarier than Reed roaming the streets of Chicago. And, Cook county jail is no Hilton. And the judges have little time to weigh all pros and cons. We all are bearing the cost of closing state psychiatric hospitals.
 
  • #9
  • #10
  • #11
  • #12
Last edited:
  • #13
Does anyone have any information about the victim?
From post #9:
The 26-year-old woman's family did not identify her or provide an update on her condition, saying only that they were focusing their attention on her recovery.
A request that the Daily Mail (naturally) didn't respect.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
56
Guests online
1,456
Total visitors
1,512

Forum statistics

Threads
638,464
Messages
18,728,838
Members
244,444
Latest member
not_weird_boi
Back
Top