On the property map the road is still labelled 625W well after that hard right turn though as it crosses under the bridge. That's my point .
Thanks, I thought I remembered seeing it labeled a such.
For reference:
The property at the end of the drive appears to be of new-ish construction, a nice property I might add.
CSX stopped running trains through there roughly 30 years ago. My hunch about the drive is it may have been an access road for the Monon and, later. CSX railroads, for the bridge (railroad folks and enthusiasts would back me up on this).. As articles about this case have noted, the properties surrounding the bridge along the RoW, which had been owned by CSX, were eventually reclaimed/claimed by owners with land adjacent to it. I could be wrong about the actual drive, perhaps 30 years ago it was both a public and private road, same as today. Public up to the bridge area, maybe? Then RR and then again public and/or then private property? Before a nice house was built at the end of the drive?
My point? I'm an obsessive person, like I'm sure all of us here, are ;-) As others have noted, killers and serial killers have interests too, just like anyone else. Certainly obsessive issues, more so than us obsessive types. I've thought from the word go that this guy knows the bridge and its surroundings, like the proverbial back of his hand, but he may not be from the immediate area. This bugs me some, the FBI has yet to come out with some form of criminal profile for the perp (assuming it's one perp).
I still maintain this Bridge Guy (BG) is a
railroad enthusiast of some sort. I am, it's in my blood, several ancestors of mine were RR people, that's how they got spread out from northern PA into Western and Central NY. I volunteer with the Fort Wayne Railroad Historical Society, to give you an idea how passionate I am. BG had no trouble at all crossing a dangerous bridge that even locals didn't know was there, until this crime happened, and I can relate. Old RR properties worth checking out tend to be on the 'outskirts of town', often times by waterways (creeks, rivers, lakes, etc.). People who live within feet, say a quarter or half mile of such a property, often times don't know it's there, or know it's there but could care less. IMO RL strikes me as a "care less" type, he's lived there 50+ years, the bridge is within sight of his property, but he may not have ever had any interest in walking the bridge. Besides, he's old, and chances are he knows the bridge is CSX property, meaning
private property.
See what I'm driving at? A killer like the one in question is banking on
assumptions. RL said nothing remotely approaching what happened to Abby and Libby had ever happened in that area, and one of his sons had played back in that area and along the creek, when he was a kid. I can relate. As young as 8 years old I was out, maybe with one other friend, fishing along a creek for crawdads and sun fish where I'm from in NY State. By what is now (but had only then recently opened) a busy highway. The perp in this case preys on the vulnerable, which is why I leaned towards SK from early on.
If I were LE and feeling stumped at this point, i would look into RR enthusiast websites, groups, etc. Ask around, see if some of those folks thought someone's interest in the
Monon High Bridge seemed beyond obsessive, as in he visited the site more than a few times, and may have posted his findings on a site or two, on several occasions. IMHO, it's not an especially remarkable railroad site, but still very cool and worth visiting, and I'm sure it's beautiful several months out of the year.
Cyber forensics might reveal some interesting things, you never know, by that I mean some sleuthing by LE on Railroad.net and similar sites.