- Joined
- Jun 27, 2019
- Messages
- 15,931
- Reaction score
- 201,011
So, the dangerous act of placing her on the railing was not enough. Unbelievable. If the video didn't exist, I could never have imagined what actually happened. They were 11 floors up.
IIRC didn't KW go on an errand to the ship's office and leave Chloe with SA for approximately 10 minutes?Given that the incident took place near a bar, I wonder if that is a designated smoking area? I've said previously that SA might have wanted to smoke, and that's why he offered to watch Chloe while the rest of the family (allegedly) went to the buffet. Smoking is not permitted in dining areas on all cruise ships.
IIRC didn't KW go on an errand to the ship's office and leave Chloe with SA for approximately 10 minutes?
BBM Right, and I was kind of shocked at how far ahead of him Chloe was running in that video. One has to be extremely vigilant with kids that age. But, I guess he didn't really care about her safety after all. Not one bit.Another changing tale in the case. It was originally reported that the rest of the family had gone to the buffet. The notion that KW was taking care of an issue on the ship just came out a day or so ago. SA never should have been put in charge of supervising a toddler![]()
I think maybe the family thought RCCL would offer a settlement before the case ever went to trial. They could have counted on garnering public sympathy with all their public appearances, and maybe RCCL would suffer business losses, or even a boycott.
But many people already were on the side of RCCL, and with the release of the video that clearly shows grandpa leaning out the window I would venture to say the tide has turned and most of social media is supporting RCCL.
What was the issue? Probably her credit card was declined MOOIIRC didn't KW go on an errand to the ship's office and leave Chloe with SA for approximately 10 minutes?
So much has happened in the last few days, it's almost overwhelming and it's certainly anger-inducing! I CANNOT BELIEVE that SA refused a plea deal when he knows the truth! He has no shame and no remorse, just continues to demonstrate the arrogance and disdain for laws that he displays with his multiple infractions for the same violation over and over! And that the family continues to spin this in every which way possible!
BUT there is one person who really really makes me want to vomit, and that is Winkleman. He is truly the epitome of every stereotype of an unethical, money-grubbing, ambulance-chasing lawyer that exists. He doesn't even spin the truth or demur or twist facts, he is a BOLD-FACED LIAR! He has seen the videos - he knows the truth! Everything that comes out of his mouth is pretty much an outright lie! I really believe that he stepped in and took advantage of a grieving family for his own greedy and publicity-seeking ends, and that in their confusion, grief, and the mother falling back into a comfort zone of dealing with problems through the court, they have been brainwashed to a large extent. A puppet on Puerto Rican TV reveals the truth, but the real puppetmaster here pulling the strings in my opinion is WINKLEMAN!
Not to say that at some point the family, especially SA, is responsible for their own actions, and I truly hope they come to their senses sooner rather than later, but I can't imagine their confusion and grief. Please, in the name of Chloe, drop this charade and grieve privately and with dignity.
What was the issue? Probably her credit card was declined MOO
IIRC didn't KW go on an errand to the ship's office and leave Chloe with SA for approximately 10 minutes?
I figured he asked her if she wanted to go to the windows and bang on them like at a hockey game, and that's why she took off running -- he saw where she went, so he didn't need to hurry (I have 3 grandchildren, and when I can walk instead of hurry, I do!)I noticed how he crouched down against that post as though he was tired of just ‘sick of running after her’. I agree with you, I got that feeling of he was slow to react when she ran off again.
It was very crowded in that area, there should be many, many witnesses.There were witnesses that day. Wonder what they said to PR authorities ?
Something is so wrong.
It'd be nice if some of those passengers who were actually there that day would come forward.
Begnaud now seems to have slightly altered his description:The host of La Comay is seriously bashing David Begnaud on their recent show... saying that David lied about and downplayed the contents of the video, assuming the public would never see it.
I agree that David’s description of the video contents was incredibly minimizing and skewed to garner sympathy for SA, which is probably why David was so defensive about his previous reporting in his twitter post yesterday. Now we, the public, can see for ourselves what it actually shows. MOO
Some of those cabins on cruise ships are SMALL! They must have upgraded to a more expensive room to fit a crib or pack-n-play in their room.
He's getting quite a lot of replies - I wonder if he will try to tweet a correction?Begnaud now seems to have slightly altered his description:
David Begnaud on Twitter
In it he claims he/reporters have been consistent in the description but now he adds "... he reached down and picked up Chloe, held her above the railing and then past the railing and she fell."
That's not my recollection of his original description. He said "over" not "past" the railing. It's a minor change of words but the implication is hard to miss.
Video shows girl's final moments with grandfather before cruise ship death