I don't know why we can't discuss both videos, there are two angles shown, the side and one that starts with him walking from the splash pad past the bar towards the windows following her but they are both clearly the same moment.
Also I love that the family has been so upset about "open windows in a childs play area" but they aren't upset about the bar clearly being there![]()
yes -in an "act of games" IIRC. and many cruisers said he was dangling her ..... the plea includes no jail time - but apparently he thinks this behavior is ok and they need to fix the ship, bar and screen the windows, etc so that another child doesn't get dangled out the window and falls to its death - he just can't admit to wrongdoing apparently.She appears to be COMPLETELY out of that window literally being held overboard, exactly as the original reports stated. That's because the footage from the ship was viewed the same day by the police IMO.
MOO is that they did see it, and aren’t admitting it because they know they have no case. MOO MOOWhen I saw how high over his head he lifted her up to put her out of that window, well, I haven't stopped shaking since. Her parents need to see this.
why in the world would MW be pursuing this lawsuit? it's a no win situation IMO.
This is exactly how it was stated and demonstrated in the early reports after she fell. Those of us who had posted on the first WS thread (that was deleted) discussed it extensively.When I saw how high over his head he lifted her up to put her out of that window, well, I haven't stopped shaking since. Her parents need to see this.
why in the world would MW be pursuing this lawsuit? it's a no win situation IMO.
I hope you're right and I think you are.MOO is that they did see it, and aren’t admitting it because they know they have no case. MOO MOO
There is always the chance one or two jurors will be so sympathetic to the family that they will overlook facts.why in the world would MW be pursuing this lawsuit? it's a no win situation IMO.
They confirmed today that this video is authentic, right?I hope you're right and I think you are.
YesThey confirmed today that this video is authentic, right?
Statement from the family, taken from this article:
Grandfather offered plea deal in girl's cruise ship death as Puerto Rico TV show airs video
"In a statement, the Wiegand family said: "The family is shocked by the deplorable and disgraceful misconduct that led to the release of this footage. The family's sole motivation for not releasing the video was to protect their older child. That motivation has not changed. The family publicly asks the Puerto Rican authorities, why was this footage released? Why do you continue to inflict such heinous emotional distress on our family? Haven't we been punished enough by the loss of Chloe? Finally, the family requests an immediate, independent investigation done into the circumstances surrounding the leak." "
IMO, there is no way anyone in the family has seen that video (including the GF)
I speak Spanish and have seen the full video at both angles aired on La Comey (they released the longest footage of the incident and from 2 views) .
If we have the OK to discuss it, I’d be happy to translate.
How could they have confirmed that the video released today was authentic if they hadn’t viewed it?I don't think MW or the parents had seen the video. They said that they didn't want to see the video even though it was offered while they were still on the ship. That, to me, was very telling.
How could they have confirmed that the video released today was authentic if they hadn’t viewed it?