LE Getting SA to Crack?
sbm
If PR's laws re crim defendant's rights are similar to state laws, after a defendant engages legal counsel, PR LE is prohibited from questioning him, at least without counsel there. And w counsel's job to ensure SA's rights, why would counsel allow that to happen? Doubtful imo that LE can "get SA to crack." (Sorry if I am misreading your post.)
Reaching a plea agreement is a different issue/process and may still be a possibility. TV & movies often show a conference room w crim prosecutors sitting across from defendant & def atty, w all spit-balling, talking off the cuff, about a poss plea deal. From discussions w crim def attys & prosecutors, I understand it rarely happens that way, w defendant in same room.
As you say, maybe someone can "get SA to crack" {{ETA: and maybe from there a plea agreement can be reached.}}
@SaguaroSpirit.... Hopefully LE can get SA to crack and tell the truth, or someone can and blow this whole thing out of the water once and for all.

If PR's laws re crim defendant's rights are similar to state laws, after a defendant engages legal counsel, PR LE is prohibited from questioning him, at least without counsel there. And w counsel's job to ensure SA's rights, why would counsel allow that to happen? Doubtful imo that LE can "get SA to crack." (Sorry if I am misreading your post.)
Reaching a plea agreement is a different issue/process and may still be a possibility. TV & movies often show a conference room w crim prosecutors sitting across from defendant & def atty, w all spit-balling, talking off the cuff, about a poss plea deal. From discussions w crim def attys & prosecutors, I understand it rarely happens that way, w defendant in same room.
As you say, maybe someone can "get SA to crack" {{ETA: and maybe from there a plea agreement can be reached.}}
Last edited: