passin_through
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2007
- Messages
- 1,143
- Reaction score
- 0
Lee sounds to me like he thinks he's much wiser than the police. I guess the Anthony's are consistant at something 

Has anybody in that stupid family shed ONE tear for poor Caylee????? It sure doens't seem like it. They all seem to be so non-emotional about her!!
i dont think lee sounds older than his years, i think he just sounds like a member of law enforcement, just like casey does. they both use "official" and investigative sounding words.
vehicle instead of car, residence instead of house, conveyed instead of said, etc.
it makes both of them sound detached and somewhat rehearsed, in casey it makes her sound guilty and insincere, with lee it makes him sound detached and somewhat inappropriate. but i dont think he is lying or involved.
Remember: this is July 23rd, probably the 4th or 5th time LA was interviewed. Reading thru the interviews, the detectives often say, "okay point 8, we talked about x y z..." I am pretty sure this is after they get their initial interviews and they want clear, recorded answers to their questions - if you did this the day of an event and the person was super emotional and crying, you wouldn't be able to hear what the person was saying.
Also its much more helpful to the prosecutor and detectives if the person thinks everything through and talks everything through before they record / sign / enter this into public record. Wouldn't want someone getting accused of perjury because they were crying and said saturday instead of sunday... IMO
I'm sure they have all shed oceans of tears for baby Caylee. Just because we do not see them a mess on national TV does not for a minute mean they are not hurting. These people are living a nightmare and nobody here should speculate on how they really feel, because nobody knows what goes on behind closed doors. Casey has put this family through hell for many years. They have admitted that on numerous occassions. Why kick them any more while they are down? I just don't get it.
Everyone is looking to blame somebody else or connect somebody else to Casey killing Caylee. This whole family has grilled Casey and she will not talk. They are frantic and praying that just maybe this spiteful b!tch might tell them the truth. Lee is not on her side. He's playing the spiteful B!tches game!
Also, how does she say "we could have found her a month ago" before she knew she had been missing a month?
We don't know how forthright he is, yet. Not enough facts...
jmo
I am having a hard time with something in the interview of Lee.
Cindy and Lee are relatively knew to the nightmare of Caylee being missing, no arrest yet or anything, Casey's in a room with Lee. Cindy enters ...
How they get from Cindy asking Casey, "What have you done"
to Cindy asking Casey, "Who took her?"
without stories and explanations to swing Cindy and Lee from 1 thought process off in another direction.
I am really puzzled by this in Lee's accounting still.
It is like we go from point A to point C but we are not privvy to whatever is point B.
I am still into the first round of listening but I will listen again of course.
It is hard for me to believe because:
1.Cindy speaks: "Casey, what have you done."
2. Cindy speaks: " Who took her?"
There is , if I remember, no time that is filled in with explanations, theories, or things being heard.
It is a gigantic leap from Harm Avenue to Kidnapping Lane without an interconnecting street to get us there.
I therefore think some things may have been said which have been omitted on purpose. I will definitely listen again later.
Yep. Carts before horses. I'm re-listening and also reading and making notes. It's out of whack here.
Either way it's all hear say and it will never be allowed at the trial. Before we all jump to conclusions maybe we should hang on and wait for Cindy's audio to come out. JMO
THAT is definately NOT a nervous laugh !!!! errrrrrrrr