• #1,141
The US has never sold those things to Iran and never will. That’s utter nonsense.
Moo... that's exactly what I am saying. USA wants to be main supplier..moo
 
  • #1,142
Moo... that's exactly what I am saying. USA wants to be main supplier..moo

I’m pretty sure that even Candace Owens isn’t insane enough to make a claim like that.

That’s so delusional that I hope it’s some sort of joke.

Do you even have basic knowledge on what we’re discussing?
 
  • #1,143
View attachment 649962
Starmer added that the UK would also deploy the HMS Dragon, one of the Royal Navy’s six Type 45 air defence destroyers, to the Eastern Mediterranean.

The prime minister’s announcement comes a day after a suspected Iranian drone attacked the British airbase in Cyprus, but the ministry of defence said the damage was “minimal”.

Monday’s attack happened after Starmer said the UK would help Washington in the war against Iran. The UK had initially denied access over fears that it would violate international law.

“The UK is fully committed to the security of Cyprus and British military personnel based there,” Starmer said on Tuesday
Given that it's been obvious for weeks that it was probably about to kick off over Iran (no American President has ever accumulated that much material in theatre and not used it), and given that the Iranian regime sees us as the 'little satan' to America's 'great satan', you would have thought somebody, somewhere would have asked themselves 'how do we defend the British Sovereign Bases on Cyprus', given that they are probably the worst defended air bases in the entire region, but apparently not.

Now we're scrambling around trying to find a single servicable warship to station in the Eastern Med after the Cypriots asked the French to send their aircraft carrier battle group!
 
  • #1,144
They might want to lineup a replacement for him too
Yes and he just inherited his fathers wealth!! Does he have a wife and children?
 
  • #1,145
  • #1,146
Khameni's son named as successor? Anyone have a link?
 
  • #1,147
  • #1,148
Snipped by me

When children grow up in conflict, they often develop into rigid thinkers who cling to prejudices and have little regard for the dignity of others, she continued. "When a country restricts opinions, it restricts its own future."
...

Although Melania Trump remained silent on the Iran war, top UN diplomat Rosemary DiCarlo did address it during the hearing. She recalled that armed conflicts have not reached this high since World War II, and that the conflict in the Middle East also underscores the importance of the issue. "The reality is clear: when conflict breaks out, it's the children who suffer the most."

Does she actually victim blame children who survive “conflict”?
 
  • #1,149
The US has never sold those things to Iran and never will. That’s utter nonsense.

This article is from Sept 1980.


Between 1970 and 1978, the Shah of Iran ordered $20 billion worth of arms, ammunition and other military merchandise from the United States in what one member of Congress called 'the most rapid build-up of military power under peacetime conditions of any nation in the history of the world.'

In May 1972, President Nixon and Henry Kissinger flew to Tehran and signed a secret agreement with the Shah. Iran was then permitted to order virtually any weapons systems it wanted. Within months of the May 1972 showdown, the Shah ordered eighty F14s at an estimated cost of $2 billion, as well as dozens of other US weapons systems. Iranian spending on U.S. arms soared from $500 million in 1972 to $2.2 billion in 1973 and a staggering $4.3 billion in 1974. In addition to the F-14s, major Iranian purchases included:

To round out the Iranian shopping list, one would have to include billions of dollars worth of such mundane items as transport planes, armoured personnel carriers and artillery pieces. All told, the Shah ordered $20 billion worth of US arms between 1972 and 1978, or about double America's military sales to all countries of the world for the twenty five years following World War II.

 
  • #1,150
  • #1,151
  • #1,152
This article is from Sept 1980.


Between 1970 and 1978, the Shah of Iran ordered $20 billion worth of arms, ammunition and other military merchandise from the United States in what one member of Congress called 'the most rapid build-up of military power under peacetime conditions of any nation in the history of the world.'

In May 1972, President Nixon and Henry Kissinger flew to Tehran and signed a secret agreement with the Shah. Iran was then permitted to order virtually any weapons systems it wanted. Within months of the May 1972 showdown, the Shah ordered eighty F14s at an estimated cost of $2 billion, as well as dozens of other US weapons systems. Iranian spending on U.S. arms soared from $500 million in 1972 to $2.2 billion in 1973 and a staggering $4.3 billion in 1974. In addition to the F-14s, major Iranian purchases included:

To round out the Iranian shopping list, one would have to include billions of dollars worth of such mundane items as transport planes, armoured personnel carriers and artillery pieces. All told, the Shah ordered $20 billion worth of US arms between 1972 and 1978, or about double America's military sales to all countries of the world for the twenty five years following World War II.

Not with Komenhei in power.

They’ve been under an arms embargo since the mid 80’s.

No legal or open U.S. arms sales to Iran have occurred since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
• After 1986, U.S. policy has been strict embargo and sanctions on Iranian weapons procurement.
• Any weapons Iran has obtained since then have come from Russia, China, North Korea, domestic production, or illicit networks — not the U.S.
 
  • #1,153
Not with Komenhei in power.

They’ve been under an arms embargo the entire period of his rule.

No legal or open U.S. arms sales to Iran have occurred since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
• After 1986, U.S. policy has been strict embargo and sanctions on Iranian weapons procurement.
• Any weapons Iran has obtained since then have come from Russia, China, North Korea, domestic production, or illicit networks — not the U.S.

I was just responding to your post that said that the US had never sold arms to Iran.

imo
 
  • #1,154
  • #1,155
What the president determined is he didn’t want to just ... keep the country safe from an Iranian nuclear weapon for the first three, four years of his second term. He wanted to make sure that Iran could never have a nuclear weapon, and that would require, fundamentally, a change in mindset from the Iranian regime,” Vance said Monday night in an interview on Fox News.

“So he saw that the Iranian regime was weakened, he knew that they were committed to getting on that brink of a nuclear weapon, and he decided to take action because he felt that was necessary in order to protect the nation’s security,” he added.

Vance reinforced the message later that night in an X post that included a clip of the interview.

“President Trump will not get the United States into a years-long conflict with no clear objective,” he wrote. “Iran can never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. That is the goal of this operation and President Trump will see it through to completion.⁩”
 
  • #1,156
  • #1,157
Not with Komenhei in power.

They’ve been under an arms embargo since the mid 80’s.

No legal or open U.S. arms sales to Iran have occurred since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
• After 1986, U.S. policy has been strict embargo and sanctions on Iranian weapons procurement.
• Any weapons Iran has obtained since then have come from Russia, China, North Korea, domestic production, or illicit networks — not the U.S.
Obama made sure that Iran had plenty of money to buy any weapons they wanted. IMO.
 
  • #1,158
Does she actually victim blame children who survive “conflict”?
Moo..I am not sure what she is trying to say. The reality is a child will either grow up with fear or anger if growing up in a conflictual relationship. Whether parents or culture..moo
 
  • #1,159
It is KhAmenie.

To avoid confusion with Khomenie many years ago
Not with Komenhei in power.

They’ve been under an arms embargo the entire period of his rule.

No legal or open U.S. arms sales to Iran have occurred since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
• After 1986, U.S. policy has been strict embargo and sanctions on Iranian weapons procurement.
• Any weapons Iran has obtained since then have come from Russia, China, North Korea, domestic production, or illicit networks — not the U.S.
 
  • #1,160
Carney has weighed in to support nuclear weapon prevention, and to express regret - referencing the failure of international order. Canada wants a rapid de-escalation, which means In My Opinion he does not agree with 4-5 weeks of bombing Iran, or longer, and ground troops should not be in the region while eliminating nuclear weapon threat.

"Prime Minister Mark Carney said Canada has long supported efforts to dismantle Iran's nuclear program, but called for a "rapid de-escalation of hostilities" to save civilian lives.
...

"We took a position because we view the nuclear threat and the export terrorism of Iran as one of the greatest threats to international peace and security," he added. "In that limited sense, we support this action. That is not a blank cheque, that is not us participating, that is not us asking for something in exchange for that."
...

Carney said Canada "supports efforts" to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. "Canada has long supported the imperative of neutralizing this grave global threat," he said. "We take this position with regret because the current conflict is another example of the failure of the international order."
...

Carney added that Iran's regime is "the biggest exporter of terror in the world" and had "murdered scores of Canadians." "Nobody has a civil nuclear program that's buried a mile beneath the desert," he said. "That is a threat."

 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
175
Guests online
3,155
Total visitors
3,330

Forum statistics

Threads
644,200
Messages
18,812,919
Members
245,323
Latest member
kyarajayne
Top