• #721
I believe he’s just quoting the article shared here earlier about the Pentagon telling Congress there was no imminent threat of Iran striking any US targets prior to Trump bombing them.

Yup, and I absolutely believe that to be true.

You do not wait until threat are "imminent," but you also don't claim they are unless that is true. No need to make that statement, when the facts alone are compelling enough.
 
  • #722
I raised it because you had commented on Trump firing Generals. I merely pointed out that Obama had fired far more. Thus, Trumps actions were not out of the ordinary.

DBM...
 
Last edited:
  • #723
Yes
He cut 20% of 4 star generals
A purge of over a dozen top leaders including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, the vice chief head of Global strike command and the Air Force Special ops command as an example
I highly doubt he has any respect an it’s well known he had no experience

Thanks!!!
Was about to post the same info.....

please please state your opine.
Save our Thread. Save our Thread!!!
 
  • #724
The commanders on the ground are not appointed by the President.

Your point is completely undercut by the success of this operation.

You’re inadvertently making the argument that Trump is some sort of military genius, when again, this is being executed by career military leaders in theater.

He does not hand pick battlefield commanders. That’s not how it works at all.

I am really trying to follow your opinions here, as well as others.... I agree with much, I disagree with much.
But, in my opinion, this following statement seems, well, seems full of hubris.

Your point is completely undercut by the success of this operation.


Yes, George W. Bush’s May 1, 2003, "Mission Accomplished" speech was widely considered too early, acting as a premature declaration of victory that preceded years of violent insurgency, sectarian war, and instability. While intended to mark the end of major combat operations, the declaration became a symbol of hubris, with the vast majority of U.S. and Iraqi casualties occurring after the speech.

restating: in my opinion
 
  • #725
Al Qaeda is a terrorist entity. Iran is a terror regime (acting themselves, Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis).

Only one of them is a state actor, and the long term risks are far greater.
if we're going by state actors, i can name five or six that have killed more than 1000 americans. and most or all used tactics we would call terrorism.
 
  • #726
Google controls what its AI says about Trump. Restrictive.

As of late 2025 and early 2026, reports indicate a complex and shifting relationship between Google and the second Trump administration, with evidence suggesting that Google's AI tools have been adjusted to handle queries regarding Donald Trump differently than other political figures.

I don't use googles AI as a rule, but thanks!

It is likely I was not able to find it because he never said it would only be 2-3 days. Someone was able to link the article that was most likely being relied upon for that info.


The U.S military is preparing for the possibility of a weeks-long operation on Iran, according to two U.S. officials who spoke to Reuters.

However, Trump told Axios that the timeline of a planned U.S.-Israeli bombing operation, which would last at least five days, could change, with one factor being whether or not Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was killed.
 
  • #727
  • #728
There’s just a complete lack of understanding as to how the US military operates.

Like this? Like it always has?

https://www.war.gov/About/

Trump's Commander in Chief duties are reflected in the Pentagon’s 2026 NDS. A 180 degree turn from the last about 80 years of established national defense principles.

It’s in the memorandum that is to be adhered to [some of this has fallen by the wayside already?]:


MEMORANDUM FOR SENIOR PENTAGON LEADERSHIP COMMANDERS OF THE COMBATANT COMMANDS DEFENSE AGENCY AND DOW FIELD ACTIVITY DIRECTORS

SUBJECT: 2026 National Defense Strategy

These past leaders neglected and often actively undermined our warfighters' warrior ethos and our military's core, irreplaceable role-fighting, winning, and thereby deterring the wars that really matter to our people. Consequently, President Trump entered office with the nation on the precipice of disastrous wars for which we were unprepared. President Trump has decisively changed that, courageously putting Americans first to truly make America great once again. Under his leadership, the United States has the world's strongest, most lethal, and most capable military-indeed, the most powerful military that this world has ever seen. No longer will the Department be distracted by interventionism, endless wars, regime change, and nation building.



The 2026 National Defense Strategy shows how. This Strategy reflects President Trump's historic approach to our nation's defense. It must be carried out thoroughly, rapidly, and comprehensively. All Department of War components will adhere to the guidance and direction enclosed.



To that end, DoW will empower regional allies and partners to take primary responsibility for deterring and defending against Iran and its proxies, including by strongly backing Israel’s efforts to defend itself; deepening cooperation with our Arabian Gulf partners; and enabling integration between Israel and our Arabian Gulf partners, building on President Trump’s historic initiative, the Abraham Accords. As we do, DoW will maintain our ability to take focused, decisive action to defend U.S. interests.


https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/23/2003864773/-1/-1/0/2026-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY.PDF



All IMO
 
  • #729
I am really trying to follow your opinions here, as well as others.... I agree with much, I disagree with much.
But, in my opinion, this following statement seems, well, seems full of hubris.

Your point is completely undercut by the success of this operation.


Yes, George W. Bush’s May 1, 2003, "Mission Accomplished" speech was widely considered too early, acting as a premature declaration of victory that preceded years of violent insurgency, sectarian war, and instability. While intended to mark the end of major combat operations, the declaration became a symbol of hubris, with the vast majority of U.S. and Iraqi casualties occurring after the speech.

restating: in my opinion
There is absolutely no comparison between that ground war, conducted for dubious reasons, and an aerial assault designed to severely degrade Iran’s capability to wage terror, a capability that is being put on display right here (hitting numerous civilian areas in Gulf states).

This is not Iraq. Our posture and goals are completely different.

If there is regime change, it will be the Iranian people executing that, not US or Israeli forces on the ground.
 
  • #730
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Sunday lauded U.S. strikes in Iran and said Cuba is “next.”

“Cuba’s next. They’re going to follow this communist dictatorship in Cuba. Their days are numbered,” Graham said during an appearance on Fox News’s “Sunday Night in America.”

“The Iranian regime, the mother ship of international terrorism is about to collapse. The captain of the ship, the ayatollah, is stone-cold dead,” he added
 
  • #731
T
Like this? Like it always has?

https://www.war.gov/About/

Trump's Commander in Chief duties are reflected in the Pentagon’s 2026 NDS. A 180 degree turn from the last about 80 years of established national defense principles.

It’s in the memorandum that is to be adhered to [some of this has fallen by the wayside already?]:


MEMORANDUM FOR SENIOR PENTAGON LEADERSHIP COMMANDERS OF THE COMBATANT COMMANDS DEFENSE AGENCY AND DOW FIELD ACTIVITY DIRECTORS

SUBJECT: 2026 National Defense Strategy

These past leaders neglected and often actively undermined our warfighters' warrior ethos and our military's core, irreplaceable role-fighting, winning, and thereby deterring the wars that really matter to our people. Consequently, President Trump entered office with the nation on the precipice of disastrous wars for which we were unprepared. President Trump has decisively changed that, courageously putting Americans first to truly make America great once again. Under his leadership, the United States has the world's strongest, most lethal, and most capable military-indeed, the most powerful military that this world has ever seen. No longer will the Department be distracted by interventionism, endless wars, regime change, and nation building.



The 2026 National Defense Strategy shows how. This Strategy reflects President Trump's historic approach to our nation's defense. It must be carried out thoroughly, rapidly, and comprehensively. All Department of War components will adhere to the guidance and direction enclosed.



To that end, DoW will empower regional allies and partners to take primary responsibility for deterring and defending against Iran and its proxies, including by strongly backing Israel’s efforts to defend itself; deepening cooperation with our Arabian Gulf partners; and enabling integration between Israel and our Arabian Gulf partners, building on President Trump’s historic initiative, the Abraham Accords. As we do, DoW will maintain our ability to take focused, decisive action to defend U.S. interests.


https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/23/2003864773/-1/-1/0/2026-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY.PDF



All IMO
This has nothing to do with how war is waged in theater, and how combat decisions are made and carried out.
 
  • #732
Under the guidance of Military Intelligence, the Air Force completed a strike targeting dozens of command centers of the Iranian terror regime in the heart of Tehran.

As part of the sortie, the IDF struck command centers and bases of internal security forces subordinate to the Iranian terror regime, which are responsible for suppressing protests against the regime, including through the use of violence and the arrest of civilians. The strike on these bases deepens the damage to the regime's suppression capabilities.

In addition, the IDF struck more than 10 command centers of the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence, the central intelligence body of the terror regime, and the headquarters of the "Quds Force" unit. The strikes targeted command centers where Military Intelligence identified activity by regime soldiers.

Alongside this, the Air Force continued to strike ground-to-ground missile launchers, sites used to produce weaponry for Iranian forces, as well as additional sites of the Revolutionary Guards.

The completed strike deepens the damage to the Iranian terror regime. The IDF will continue to strike the regime's systems and operatives wherever they operate.


@MassGuy ..... are you getting the data here from the WSJ article.... I can't get into it, but it seems to have this data.
Can you share more?
 
  • #733
@MassGuy ..... are you getting the data here from the WSJ article.... I can't get into it, but it seems to have this data.
Can you share more?
This is from the Israeli Air Force Twitter account, not the WSJ, unless you’re referring to something else.
 
  • #734
This handout satellite image released by Maxar Technologies on June 15, 2025, shows the Natanz nuclear facilities (Shahid Ahmadi Roshan Nuclear Facilities), near Ahmadabad, Iran after airstrikes on June 15, 2025. (Via AFP)

Iran accused Israel and the United States on Monday of having attacked its nuclear facility at Natanz, one of the main targets of the previous conflict between the three countries last June.

“The criminal regimes of the United States and Israel, pursuing their aggression, again targeted the Natanz nuclear site on Sunday afternoon in two brutal attacks,” Iran’s atomic energy chief Mohammad Eslami said in a letter to the UN’s nuclear watchdog quoted by state news agency IRNA.

The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog said earlier on Monday his agency had “no indication” that any nuclear installations were damaged or hit in Iran following US and Israeli strikes on the country.
 
  • #735
There is absolutely no comparison between that ground war, conducted for dubious reasons, and an aerial assault designed to severely degrade Iran’s capability to wage terror, a capability that is being put on display right here (hitting numerous civilian areas in Gulf states).

This is not Iraq. Our posture and goals are completely different.

If there is regime change, it will be the Iranian people executing that, not US or Israeli forces on the ground.

My comment was in regards to your adamacy of "success" . I still find my comment truthful and honest.

Basically stating how claiming success too early can tarnish a speaker. And GW Bush was my comparison.

I am not, at all, trying to make comparisons between Iraq and Iran. However, as time goes on, more and more comparisons will be made. And hopefully with the positive outcomes you profess!

I also diaagree with your last statement. And Iwish you would express it as opinion rather than fact.....\]
We all have to follow the same rules here!!!
Keep the thread open!!!

mmoo, mooo.......
 
  • #736
Last edited:
  • #737
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Sunday lauded U.S. strikes in Iran and said Cuba is “next.”

“Cuba’s next. They’re going to follow this communist dictatorship in Cuba. Their days are numbered,” Graham said during an appearance on Fox News’s “Sunday Night in America.”

“The Iranian regime, the mother ship of international terrorism is about to collapse. The captain of the ship, the ayatollah, is stone-cold dead,” he added

Trumps tariffs and blocking oil from Cuba is killing those people.
The current adminstration is void of humanitarianism

Of course, Cuba is definitely next--because they are being starved and strangled.

 
  • #738
TAMPA, Fla. – As of 4 pm ET, March 2, six U.S. service members have been killed in action. U.S. forces recently recovered the remains of two previously unaccounted for service members from a facility that was struck during Iran's initial attacks in the region. Major combat operations continue. The identities of the fallen are being withheld until 24 hours after next of kin notification.

 
  • #739
My comment was in regards to your adamacy of "success" . I still find my comment truthful and honest.

Basically stating how claiming success too early can tarnish a speaker. And GW Bush was my comparison.

I am not, at all, trying to make comparisons between Iraq and Iran. However, as time goes on, more and more comparisons will be made. And hopefully with the positive outcomes you profess!

I also diaagree with your last statement. And Iwish you would express it as opinion rather than fact.....\]
We all have to follow the same rules here!!!
Keep the thread open!!!

mmoo, mooo.......
We can see the success with our own eyes, and through media reports. It is not in dispute that dozens of leaders are dead, countless missile stockpiles have been destroyed, dozens of launchers have been taken out, and the Iranian Navy has been decimated.

As for aground invasion, it is not feasible. Analysts say it would require 1.6 million troops, which is 30-40 times what is currently there. It would take many months to assemble something like that, and there is zero political will for it.

Any ground troops would almost certainly be special forces, demolishing facilities that cannot be taken out by air.
 
  • #740
Trumps tariffs and blocking oil from Cuba is killing those people.
The current adminstration is void of humanitarianism

Of course, Cuba is definitely next--because they are being starved and strangled.

Most of the rest of the world trades with Cuba. Why isn't Canada shipping energy to Cuba? Why isn't Brazil and the rest of the BRIC community bailing them out? Why was Cuba 100% reliant upon the incredibly dirty oil of Maduro?
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
233
Guests online
2,056
Total visitors
2,289

Forum statistics

Threads
644,098
Messages
18,810,889
Members
245,311
Latest member
imissyoumama802
Top