sounds defiant. which is the attitude pretty much anyone in their position would take. it's more or less how we would respond.Coming from Iran International which is generally reliable but not without its biases:
now, one might say "but their position is as a state sponsor of terror. ... it's wrong to compare us to them... .... they've killed a lot of americans... they're the bad guys .... their behavior and the trajectory they're on can't be tolerated", and i'd generally agree with that. but everyone is the hero of their own story. right? they're not going to say "we're sorry, we've been bad. you are right, we are wrong. we'll be nice and do what you want now." ... any more than americans like to admit we helped overthrow iran's democracy in the 50s and funded iraq's war against them in the 80s... and the leadership is certainly not going to do it in response to being personally attacked.
my point is this: the capitulation everyone wants is not going to happen without pressuring and cornering whoever takes over in iranian leadership to a degree that can't be achieved through air power alone, nor with any number of ground troops we're willing and able to field. most likely they're just going to work harder on hiding and finding moles.
all IMO of course
Last edited: