Jodi Arias Murder Trial - the defense continues it's case in chief-*Weekend* #90

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,061
I think there are secrets having to do with Mormon stuff that is not being told.
I think this killing was done as a ritual to please something or as an ultimate sacrifice type thing.
I think blood is a very important symbol here that equates to something. Blood was washed into a drain and back to the Earth type thing.
I think JA might have been or is brain washed by something Mormon. She seems fixated with their dogma.
Or, because she's psychopathic, its easy for Jodi to manipulate the best and worst aspects of the tenets of any religion.

In reality she states she practiced Mormonism for less than 3-4 years. I've invested decades researching different religions and spiritualities without converting to any of them. Mormonism was a convenience for her. Like most psychopaths they morph into someone that appeals to their targets. They're predatory chameleons.

True morals, religious standards, spiritual values mean nothing to them at all.

JMO
Individuals often turn to their religious communities for support during stressful times, when they may be feeling spiritually and emotionally weakened. Psychopaths often take advantage of this situation and use religion as a ruse to prey on people.

Religious Groups Attract Psychopaths
 
  • #1,062
I saw him on Greta...ugh. He talks like he's MR. Important. I think he thinks he's a media darling now.

Was he discussing this case?
 
  • #1,063
  • #1,064
or, because she's psychopathic, its easy for jodi to manipulate the best and worst aspects of the tenets of any religion.

In reality she states she practiced mormonism for less than 3-4 years. I've invested decades researching different religions and spiritualities without converting to any of them. Mormonism was a convenience for her. Like most psychopaths they morph into someone that appeals to their targets. They're predatory chameleons.

True morals, religious standards, spiritual values mean nothing to them at all.

Jmo


religious groups attract psychopaths

right on!
 
  • #1,065
I saw him on Greta...ugh. He talks like he's MR. Important. I think he thinks he's a media darling now.

OOPS...I thought we were talking about GUS. I'm suffering from dust storm brain damage after a week of dust/wind.
 
  • #1,066
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

I can't stand the notion of this guy being on the stand for any more time.

Actually, I really like the questions this jury is asking of the witnesses. They seem to be really normal people with some common sense. Though a few questions seem to be a little more on the 'just in case you though we were stupid' mode. Like the '🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬' questions. Someone having a little fun at her expense it seemed like.

But overall their questions have been ones we ourselves have wondered.

That being said, I can't think of a single question for this guy but I know that he ran from NJ and has an issue with his ethics. I don't think the Jury knows that. So, there questions could be valid without that knowledge.

Kelly
 
  • #1,067
I saw him on Greta...ugh. He talks like he's MR. Important. I think he thinks he's a media darling now.

When was he on Greta? Not talking about this case?????
 
  • #1,068
Two new photos I haven't seen before. Travis was a very handsome chap! Jodi took away this family's big brother!!

qxkjcx.jpg



Not sure if this is his grandmother.

2uffvk0.jpg

Yes that is Travis's sweet grandmother Norma Jean Sarvey. She passed away in December 2012.

http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/pe/obituary.aspx?n=norma-jean-sarvey&pid=161803605#fbLoggedOut
 
  • #1,069
Rule Reminders:

1) Keep the religious debate off of the thread please.

2) Do NOT call names or otherwise bash the defense team.

3) NO OFF COLOR OR SEXUAL JOKES PLEASE

4) if you have a problem with a post use the ALERT BUTTON (do not respond)


:bump:
 
  • #1,070
  • #1,071
Exactly. There was no accomplice. This was done by JA and JA alone.

I agree with you too ~

But.... this picture is just NOT RIGHT for there to have been only one person there :banghead:

The picture was taken accidentally. The angle shows the camera is NOT on the floor, it's at hip level... The camera looks to be back a few feet behind whoever is dragging/wrapping him in blanket.. There has to be 2 people in order for this picture to have happened - one dragging and one with camera!
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

http://i922.photobucket.com/albums/ad64/SoulShynz9293/shower_travis_murder_pics_xtralarge.jpg (last image taken at 5:33:32)
 
  • #1,072
Exactly. There was no accomplice. This was done by JA and JA alone.

But if there WAS an accomplice, she wouldn't be able to disclose him/her because that would go to premeditation, right? Ya never know ... maybe there was some truth to the Ninja story ... she was the girl and the accomplice was the guy.

Just messin witcha .... but nothing would surprise me in this trial.
 
  • #1,073
I'm just watching GMA and they are catching everyone up to the case. I'm so amused by the interrogation room footage of JA doing head stands, singing Dido (thanks for ruining that song for me), and digging through the police wastebasket like a raccoon. :floorlaugh:
Was this the beginning of a insanity plea she might have been considering back in 2008? I think she's insane for wearing those horrible white flared pants. Was this the same day she asked police for more time to put on makeup before bringing her in? And yet she went with that outfit.

If I read correctly she was under surveillance and was packing the car when arrested, and I would assume she was caught off guard. Could be why she appeared shoe less, and without makeup. So I am not sure about her setting herself up for insanity. I think that piece of footage is jodi being jodi nothing more nothing less, jodi in her purest form. jmo
 
  • #1,074
Wow! I thought witnesses, especially expert witnesses, were not supposed to speak with the media until they are excused from testifying. Is this different in the States?

Boy my oops has had some major reaction. I was talking about Gus...not Samuels.
 
  • #1,075
OOPS...I thought we were talking about GUS. I'm suffering from dust storm brain damage after a week of dust/wind.

Awww NUTS! You got me all excited that all of the quack's testimony would be thrown out for appearing on TV. :)

That's okay, at least we still get to see him Juander pressure!
 
  • #1,076
Boy my oops has had some major reaction. I was talking about Gus...not Samuels.

It's okay. I saw your correction and deleted my response
 
  • #1,077
right on!

I do think when JM made her read from a portion of the Book of Mormons about what happens when you lie (going to hell) it did affect her. She looked stricken as is she is thinking about the Law of Attraction. Just dessert. jmo
 
  • #1,078
Boy my oops has had some major reaction. I was talking about Gus...not Samuels.

Am I under surveillance mods? OK no more Mormon talk, sorry if I stepped on someone's toes.
 
  • #1,079
But if there WAS an accomplice, she wouldn't be able to disclose him/her because that would go to premeditation, right? Ya never know ... maybe there was some truth to the Ninja story ... she was the girl and the accomplice was the guy.

Just messin witcha .... but nothing would surprise me in this trial.

Exactly!!!!!! I think you are "crecht"!!!!
 
  • #1,080
Boy my oops has had some major reaction. I was talking about Gus...not Samuels.

Oh, okay. Had me there for a minute. I thought you were saying Samuels. lol Scrambled my brain a bit as he is still testifying. It's okay, I'm back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
94
Guests online
1,483
Total visitors
1,577

Forum statistics

Threads
632,349
Messages
18,625,086
Members
243,099
Latest member
Snoopy7
Back
Top