I understand why people don't like to see the gruesome photos and find it invasive. But I've worked all my life at nursing homes, hospitals and in a profession where I see really difficult stuff all the time. I'm seen autopsies and the morgue's storage rooms full of body parts and I've seen and cleaned up after many dead people. The way I look at it, those grisly photos aren't of Travis at all. They are of his earthly container, and now have nothing to do with him. Maybe a coping mechanism. Idk. I can't look at these autopsy pics as easily as I can look at some others, just because the nature of the one injury in particular always makes me quesy and also because he reminds me so much of my friends young son.
I think it's important certainly for the jury, and maybe also for the general public, to see the aftermath. I'm sure that many people who have seen Jodi or know her and have heard about the case still would not believe the full extent of what she actually did unless they see it with their own eyes. If it makes one person go, wow, yeah, the petite little psycho I'm dating could do this, and saves their life, then that's a good thing and part of his legacy. Personally, I think he would want people to see and know. But that's jmo.
But I agree, I'm a big believer in closed casket for the family in most cases, and especially this one. And I'd much rather see the pics of him alive. In my younger days I probably would have tried to catch his eye