matou
#los2188
- Joined
- May 11, 2009
- Messages
- 20,149
- Reaction score
- 2,570

Would someone mind posting that motel picture again if possible. I missed it
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/0...ic-resumes-evidence-against-michael-rafferty/
Would someone mind posting that motel picture again if possible. I missed it
A few people now have mentioned here how they think MR is "fugly, a "fatso" and other names in regards to how he looks. I'm not really sure of
of the relevance? Do people somehow think that being ugly and fat makes one look more guilty? Or maybe it's difficult for people to ignore the
misconception that people who commit these types of crimes don't look like the guy next door? If MR is guilty, he certainly doesn't fit the stereotypical idea of the neighbourhood pedophile, nor the "boogeyman".
I can understand the questioning of his recent haircut, I doubt it's so that he can't be recognized at a later date because no doubt the media do their best to get photos of him, if he is acquitted he may want to alter his appearance, and rightly so.
Why is it that no one is questioning TLM's appearance? The photo of her at the Super 8 doesn't exactly make her look like the "pretty little number" that MR allegedly is to have said. What about her appearance now? Is the pretty bob haircut and glasses a way to make her appear more innocent, naive and demure? If it is, it sure isn't working with me.
MOO
(BBM)
I think the implications may have been to suggest that the defence might claim he is not the person caught on the ATM video in Guelph. However, there are hundreds of pictures of him available showing how he looked around that time, so that would be a pretty dumb defence tactic, IMO.
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. I believe his weight gain is due to a lousy prison diet, lack of exercise, and possibly to the withdrawal from drugs. As for the haircut, it's hard to explain, unless you take into consideration the possibility of a really, really bad prison barber. (Or the barber had his own agenda for making him look bad?)
JMO
A few people now have mentioned here how they think MR is "fugly, a "fatso" and other names in regards to how he looks. I'm not really sure of
of the relevance? Do people somehow think that being ugly and fat makes one look more guilty? Or maybe it's difficult for people to ignore the
misconception that people who commit these types of crimes don't look like the guy next door? If MR is guilty, he certainly doesn't fit the stereotypical idea of the neighbourhood pedophile, nor the "boogeyman".
I can understand the questioning of his recent haircut, I doubt it's so that he can't be recognized at a later date because no doubt the media do their best to get photos of him, if he is acquitted he may want to alter his appearance, and rightly so.
Why is it that no one is questioning TLM's appearance? The photo of her at the Super 8 doesn't exactly make her look like the "pretty little number" that MR allegedly is to have said. What about her appearance now? Is the pretty bob haircut and glasses a way to make her appear more innocent, naive and demure? If it is, it sure isn't working with me.
MOO
No, I get that, I'm wondering the relevance of the comments that demean his looks. Who cares if he's fat or ugly, it doesn't change what he has or has not done.
MOO
Killer cop disgusts even Paul Bernardo
No it doesn't but sometimes defense teams have specific strategies to make their clients look a certain way, imo
We've seen it many cases. They also alter the height of the accused chairs to make them look small and meek.
The weight gain can be because of the delicious pasta dishes in jail and the haircut....well...ummmmm.....I guess Vidal Sassoon wasn't available. :dunno:
BBM
I have only seen that happen in one recent case. It is going to be tough to make MR look small and meek given that he is sitting in a prisoners box all by his lonesome.
And yet, do we really know this for a fact?I guess MR had lots of patience, he waited about 2 hours before he "allegedly" raped Tori. JMO
BBM
I have only seen that happen in one recent case. It is going to be tough to make MR look small and meek given that he is sitting in a prisoners box all by his lonesome.
Not only that, but why on earth would the defence agree to give him that haircut if it only makes him look worse? Maybe he got gum in his hair too, lol
And yet, do we really know this for a fact?
I have been pondering this question. The timeline... Just thinking...
JMO
Actually, he would have waited longer. Tori was pushed into his car at 3:32 or 3:33 pm and the Home Depot purchase was at 5:12 pm. It was 50 minutes later that they arrived at the location at Mount Forest, (based on the 50 minutes from the Guelph Home Depot that LE was asking people to check their properties). That means the arrival time was 6:02 pm. So he waited over 2 and a half hours to rape Tori. No, we don't know it for a fact yet. JMO
I always wondered where the 50 minutes came from, maybe that was when his phone pinged off the cell tower????
Not only that, but why on earth would the defence agree to give him that haircut if it only makes him look worse? Maybe he got gum in his hair too, lol