LIST Questions & Answers #8 LIST ONLY NO DISCUSSION

[Reagan]

Does anyone remember when George gave testimony about the day of the gas can incident? Did he actually get to see inside the trunk, or did she just throw the cans at him and close the trunk?

If indeed, he saw the inside of the trunk and said he remembers laundry, I would like to read his statement.

TIA

In his interview with OCSO he states that he didn't see in the trunk and didn't get that close. In his FBI interview he states that he did see inside of the trunk. It's that interview where he referenced the blue crate things and laundry.

Good luck trying to guess which interview was the truth :waitasec:

 

[TakeNote]

has anyone looked at any or the new doc dump info to see if it can be linked to when the Death P was put back on? any final results from testing....help SA to decide to put it back....thanks

hope that makes since

 

[2goldfish]

In his interview with OCSO he states that he didn't see in the trunk and didn't get that close. In his FBI interview he states that he did see inside of the trunk. It's that interview where he referenced the blue crate things and laundry.

Good luck trying to guess which interview was the truth :waitasec:

can someone remind me of the gas can date, I have forgotten and I cant stop sneezing long enough to search through.....I am thinking to myself that shouldnt GA have noticed a stench on that day? curious.

 

[Patty G]

can someone remind me of the gas can date, I have forgotten and I cant stop sneezing long enough to search through.....I am thinking to myself that shouldnt GA have noticed a stench on that day? curious.

IIRC, the date for the gas can reported to the police is June 24, 2008; same day as when Casey returned home and the gas cans were in the back of Casey's car.

 

[AZlawyer]

has anyone looked at any or the new doc dump info to see if it can be linked to when the Death P was put back on? any final results from testing....help SA to decide to put it back....thanks

hope that makes since

It looks like the last shipment to the entomologist was sent March 3. I'm thinking that was the shipment with the adult flies that had hatched within the white trash bag with the paper towels. DP put back on the table April 14, so they might have had a verbal report on the results by then.

 

[belle3]

iwas reading a thread a couple of days ago and something came up about the different fictitious names in this case, such as tom manley and their connections and a poster said they had done indepth research on the names and now i cant remember what thread i read it in and who the poster was. any help would be greatly appreciated as i am interested in the connections of the names in the case.

 

[spiderlady]

Two questions really:

Are the Anthony's given information contained in the documents before the Doc Dumps?


Did we ever find out the fantastic "news" the TP alluded too in one of these threads?

 

[Patty G]

Two questions really:

Are the Anthony's given information contained in the documents before the Doc Dumps?


Did we ever find out the fantastic "news" the TP alluded too in one of these threads?

IMO, The Anthony's are not priviledged to any information prior to the documents being released to the defense. The state is for Caylee, Jose is for Casey and the Anthony's are just Mr. & Mrs. Joe Public.

If anything, the Anthony's attorney might get a copy from the defense or request their own copy from the court system.

Regarding what TP alluded to, I have yet to see anything that was "unexpected" from the State or Defense Team.

 

[Patty G]

iwas reading a thread a couple of days ago and something came up about the different fictitious names in this case, such as tom manley and their connections and a poster said they had done indepth research on the names and now i cant remember what thread i read it in and who the poster was. any help would be greatly appreciated as i am interested in the connections of the names in the case.

If you go to the search feature and put in the name, and select either all posts or threads, a list will come up where this name has been mentioned.

 

[Micheline]

Does anyone know the brithday of Annie Downing (day and month would be enough)

I cannot find it anywhere but it indicates when she did visit Casey which is unclear till now. TIA

 

[Mominva]

I have a stupid question that has been bugging me for awhile:blushing:
If i remember correctly they did not find any dna evidence from the stain in the trunk. So if the stain was decompostion i would think it would have dna. So basically i am asking was it ever determined that the stain was decomp and if it wasnt why the strong smell? Does that make any sense?:waitasec:

 

[lizzysf]

Did Cindy start saying "pizza 19 days in a hot trunk" before she actually knew the day the car was dumped? I am looking for when that fact came out..and when she started saying that... which came first? Intially, Casey was telling her she didn't know where the car was.
the 6/27 to 7/15 is 19 days..

 

[Patty G]

Did Cindy start saying "pizza 19 days in a hot trunk" before she actually knew the day the car was dumped? I am looking for when that fact came out..and when she started saying that... which came first? Intially, Casey was telling her she didn't know where the car was.
the 6/27 to 7/15 is 19 days..

IIRC, Cindy said "pizza 19 days in a hot trunk" on July 22, 2008 after the bond hearing. So the 19 days falls into the timeframe of when the car was towed.

This is part of the interview after the bond hearing. YouTube- Cindy Anthony 7/22/08

There is more to this interview where Cindy says the days, but I don't have that one handy. I am pretty sure we have it in the Media Forum.

 

[lizzysf]

IIRC, Cindy said "pizza 19 days in a hot trunk" on July 22, 2008 after the bond hearing. So the 19 days falls into the timeframe of when the car was towed.

This is part of the interview after the bond hearing. YouTube- Cindy Anthony 7/22/08

There is more to this interview where Cindy says the days, but I don't have that one handy. I am pretty sure we have it in the Media Forum.

Did she know at this time of the bond hearing (7/22) that car was at the Amscot from the 27th to the tow on the 30th? 6/30-7/15 is only 16 days. Or did she just know it was towed on the 30th? 6/27-67/15 is 19 days.
The video doesn't say... hmmm. I have to dig. Wondering if she knew it was there since the 27th before LE released that info.

 

[RR0004]

Has a trial date been set?

 

[Patty G]

Did she know at this time of the bond hearing (7/22) that car was at the Amscot from the 27th to the tow on the 30th? 6/30-7/15 is only 16 days. Or did she just know it was towed on the 30th? 6/27-67/15 is 19 days.
The video doesn't say... hmmm. I have to dig. Wondering if she knew it was there since the 27th before LE released that info.

Cindy gave "off-beat" days about how long the pizza was in the trunk. I don't recall if on the tow receipt if there was info indicating that the car was left at Amscot for "x" amount of days or not. At the time of the bond hearing on July 22, IF the info was on the tow receipt regarding the car sitting at Amscot, then this is where Cindy calculated the days.

IMO, no Cindy didn't know the car was at Amscot on June 27th because IF Cindy spotted Casey car there, Cindy would be on it in a split-second.

 

[notthatsmart]

Dr vass email to ocso, found a couple of components and was wondering if the car had been in a low lieing swampy area. what was that all about? what samples is he talking about?

 

[ZsaZsa]

I have a stupid question that has been bugging me for awhile:blushing:
If i remember correctly they did not find any dna evidence from the stain in the trunk. So if the stain was decompostion i would think it would have dna. So basically i am asking was it ever determined that the stain was decomp and if it wasnt why the strong smell? Does that make any sense?:waitasec:

We don't have a report on that yet.

 

[Mominva]

We don't have a report on that yet.

Thank you for answering my question.:crazy:

 

[AZlawyer]

I have a stupid question that has been bugging me for awhile:blushing:
If i remember correctly they did not find any dna evidence from the stain in the trunk. So if the stain was decompostion i would think it would have dna. So basically i am asking was it ever determined that the stain was decomp and if it wasnt why the strong smell? Does that make any sense?:waitasec:

We do have a report on what chemicals were found in the air that "off-gassed" from a sample of the carpet from the trunk of the car, after the carpet sample was kept in a sealed container for a period of time. 6 of the chemicals found in the carpet sample air met the following conditions: (1) they are associated with human decomposition, (2) they were also found in a sample from a blanket that had held a decomposing 3-year old child kept in the trunk of a car in a Montana case, (3) they were not found in a carpet sample from another car of the same make and model, (4) they were not found in a sample of the air from the white trash bag, which means they could not be accounted for by any of the items in the trash bag, (5) they were not found in a sample of the air from the passenger area of the car, (6) they were not found in the air of the laboratory that was performing the tests, (7) they were not found in the air of the OSCO forensics garage, (8) they were not found in gasoline, which accounted for many of the other chemicals found in the carpet sample, (9) they were not found in decomposing pizza.

In addition, carbon tetrachloride, which is found in human decomposition but not in animals that have been tested, was found in the trunk carpet. A trace of carbon tetrachloride was also found in the air from the trash bag, but of course the paper towels with potential decomp residue were also in the trash bag. No trace of carbon tetrachloride was found in the sample of carpet from the similar car, in the passenger area of the car, in the laboratory air, in the decomposing pizza tested by the lab, in gasoline vapors tested by the lab, or in the OSCO forensics garage. Moreover, no carbon tetrachloride was found in the air "off-gassed" from a carpet sample on which a squirrel was allowed to decompose.

Chemicals that would have been expected if an animal (rather than a human) had decomposed in the trunk were not found in the carpet sample.

Butyric acid was found in scrapings from the carpet. This acid is a product of human decomposition. It is also found, for example, in rancid butter, but there is no other indication of the presence of butter in the trunk.

http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/06/19/6551.6591.pdf