Local 6 Uncovers New Info in Anthony Case

  • #481
Since they haven't entered anything into evidence that would support a drowning theory, isn't it rather to late for that??

I think what he was trying to do/prove is that Dr. G couldn't state for fact, how she died. IT could have been suffercation, it could have been drowning. IF he could get her to state an alternative, then he would have used that against her. Poke holes in her statements. Make it seem like she was trying to "be mean" to ICA. <eye roll> Which is why Dr. G came back at him about what the tape on the head actually means.
BBM. I'm sure the defense will use the lack of cause of death to question Dr. G's finding of homicide, as the manner of death. And Dr. G, being the professional that she is, will explain how ME's can come to that conclusion, when no cause of death can be determined (usually because the body is skeletonized). Duct tape over the face of a two year old, found in multiple trash bags in the woods, not reported missing by mother, is acceptable evidence to rule a homicide.

I believe CM tried to ask Dr G if she ruled the death a homicide, based on what LE had told her, and I thought of this. There was a case of Dr. G's where the homicide detectives thought a son had stabbed his father. LE was in on the autopsy, because they were pretty sure this was the case. Dr. G found out, during the toxicology tests, that the father went into psychosis, stabbing himself to death, from an overdose of a certain medication. Now, even though she had LE breathing down her neck, she went with her own examination and findings. The 15 year old son was not charged, thanks to Dr. G.

My point is, that if the defense tries to say the ME went with LE's opinion as to manner of death, there have been plenty of cases where she can prove them wrong.
 
  • #482
He said he used his poker and put it in the eye socket, lifted and dropped it.

I can't believe I just typed that :sick:

wow...I didn't recall that either.

oh, heavens to mercy.
 
  • #483
From the article:

In an interview with investigators less than a week after finding the remains, Kronk said he &#8220;lifted it barely &#8230; I just kinda lifted it up a little bit &#8230; and then I just dropped it.&#8221;
 
  • #484
Did anyone else notice the discrepancy in that article about WHICH socket Kronk put the stick in to? He said right and Mason said left when questioning Dr. G.

Interesting!
 
  • #485
Did anyone else notice the discrepancy in that article about WHICH socket Kronk put the stick in to? He said right and Mason said left when questioning Dr. G.

Interesting!

I thought that was CM attempting to trick him.
 
  • #486
Did anyone else notice the discrepancy in that article about WHICH socket Kronk put the stick in to? He said right and Mason said left when questioning Dr. G.

Interesting!

Kronk, facing the skull, could have said right (his point of reference) when it was the left (skull's point of reference).
 
  • #487
Oh, OK. Sounds like he just lifted it a tiny bit with the meter stick through the eye socket until he saw what it was.

Right and then the defense is going to bring up the "mud" found in the skull which could have very well came from the stick he poked it with.
 
  • #488
He said he used his poker and put it in the eye socket, lifted and dropped it.

I can't believe I just typed that :sick:

Ackkkk! I come on the board and this is the first thing I read! W - T - H????

I don't think I'm going any further :ohoh:

This is not sounding good......
 
  • #489
CM asked Dr. G if the mandible was there, when she looked at the pictures (in the above article). Since they are talking about staging, is he trying to say the mandible was attached by the "person" who applied the duct tape (not his client) ? Seems to me they are trying to explain away that pesky duct tape.
 
  • #490
My husband is laughing at me because, after 17 years of practicing law, I continue to be disgusted by the idea that it is OK to try to destroy an innocent person's life and reputation in the name of defending your own client.
 
  • #491
My husband is laughing at me because, after 17 years of practicing law, I continue to be disgusted by the idea that it is OK to try to destroy an innocent person's life and reputation in the name of defending your own client.

That is why you need to be a prosecutor!!! And a teacher. ;)
 
  • #492
  • #493
Spangle, do you remember early on when they tried to spin "neck-breaking" as a local rock band? So, household weapons, chloroform, and shovel must be the opening acts?

oh yes, I remember that! LOL! Bands do have those kinds of names today.. but those were not the web pages she clicked on when she made those searches, now did she.. Woops!
 
  • #494
CM asked Dr. G if the mandible was there, when she looked at the pictures (in the above article). Since they are talking about staging, is he trying to say the mandible was attached by the "person" who applied the duct tape (not his client) ? Seems to me they are trying to explain away that pesky duct tape.

Based on the condition of the duct tape and attachment to Caylee's hair, it'd have to be before decomp ... This isn't going to fly.
 
  • #495
Can't afford the pay cut--for either one lol.

I know. :sigh:

That is why I said "And.."; you'd have to work at least 2 jobs. ;)

Salaries for both are pitifully lacking.
 
  • #496
Did they just show a picture of Caylee's skull?? What was that picture they showed???

No it wasn't Caylee's skull..Pipitone said it was their own artistic rendering of A skull.
 
  • #497
Did anyone else notice the discrepancy in that article about WHICH socket Kronk put the stick in to? He said right and Mason said left when questioning Dr. G.

Interesting!

Yup I caught that too.
 
  • #498
And these two nights of "drivel" took "Pippy" days or hours of reading to discover? :rolleyes: Pffffft!
 
  • #499
And these two nights of "drivel" took "Pippy" days or hours of reading to discover? :rolleyes: Pffffft!

It's easier to find facts than it is to find spin! :great:
 
  • #500
what does it matter really if he picked it or kicked it imo its all irrelevant

if i stumble across something and i check to see what it is, its still a dead body, him replacing it makes no difference he didnt kill her wrap in in her own blanket and place her there if he hadnt checked she might not have been found imo they should be thanking him not saying you moved the skull a couple of centimeters get a grip dufence team grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
123
Guests online
1,984
Total visitors
2,107

Forum statistics

Threads
632,828
Messages
18,632,359
Members
243,307
Latest member
Lordfrazer
Back
Top