joypath
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 1,667
- Reaction score
- 858
:twocents: For what it's worth: after re-evaluation, this "new stuff" isn't so new and dangerous for anybody EXCEPT the defense! Yes, first emotions were :maddening: "HOW DARE THEY/HE have material that no other party (outside of the "inner circle") has seen AND taken "out of context" comments were/appeared to be SLANTED"!:maddening:
REALITY CHECK: Nothing has really changed! The "dramatic information" offered by Jan was NOT a "do-over/take back", it was information SHE'S going to state UNDER OATH AGAIN......and ya betcha that John Schultz, Ph.D will have more to add/support/buttress the conclusion of manner of death.
Cheney Mason has provided a wonderful theory, a theory that the STATE does not have to pursue beyond LOGICAL behavior that one would expect from a responsible parent/adult/human of almost any age (think: even toddlers CALL 911 for help!).
Speaking just for the scientific community (how presumptuous, I know!:innocent
but MOST if not all scientific specialists WILL NOT make claims UNDER OATH that what "so & so saw but I didn't" is WHAT I SAW!:banghead:
Now on the stand, being asked an opinion and stating it based within medical certainty (standards of practice) and /or after an extensive literature/professional & collegial search, THEN one can opine and emote, testify via lecture as some are prone to do or just babble but be ready to dance the "(s)he said & (S)HE said tango" aka the "battle of the experts"
REALITY CHECK: Nothing has really changed! The "dramatic information" offered by Jan was NOT a "do-over/take back", it was information SHE'S going to state UNDER OATH AGAIN......and ya betcha that John Schultz, Ph.D will have more to add/support/buttress the conclusion of manner of death.
Cheney Mason has provided a wonderful theory, a theory that the STATE does not have to pursue beyond LOGICAL behavior that one would expect from a responsible parent/adult/human of almost any age (think: even toddlers CALL 911 for help!).
Speaking just for the scientific community (how presumptuous, I know!:innocent

Now on the stand, being asked an opinion and stating it based within medical certainty (standards of practice) and /or after an extensive literature/professional & collegial search, THEN one can opine and emote, testify via lecture as some are prone to do or just babble but be ready to dance the "(s)he said & (S)HE said tango" aka the "battle of the experts"