VERDICT WATCH MA - Ana Walshe, 39, allegedly left home, may have been dismembered, Cohasset, Jan 2023 *husband indicted* #4

[LittleSeaTree]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000623558532214792

He’s really an odd bird.

 

[Weki]

So the jury didn’t buy sudden unexplained death followed by an unexplained body chopping and dumping around town?? What a shocker!

So an interesting theory I heard about today is that this was strictly a financial motive. He killed her for money to cover his restitution and stay out of prison/rebuild his life. I’m inclined to believe this was the primary reason.

JMO

 

[Maat99]

He’s really an odd bird.

That file must contain the documents that are going to exonerate him

 

[Seattle1]

DAY 11 – 12/15/25​

• LIVESTREAM: MA v. Brian Walshe – Day 11 | The Disappearance of Ana Walshe Murder Trial
• The jury returned a verdict of guilty on the charge of first-degree murder.
  • WATCH: The Disappearance of Ana Walshe Murder Trial: Watch the Verdict!

Brian Walshe, 50, was convicted of first-degree murder in the presumed death of his wife, Ana Walshe, 39. On Nov. 18, moments before jury selection began in the trial, Brian pleaded guilty to two charges in connection with Ana’s disappearance: misleading a police officer and conveyance of a human body. His sentencing is scheduled for Wednesday, Dec. 17.

MA v. Brian Walshe: The Disappearance of Ana Walshe Murder Trial

UPDATE: A jury convicted Brian Walshe of first-degree murder in the death of his wife, Ana Walshe, whose body has never been found.

www.courttv.com

 

[mrjitty]

I apologize if this has been discussed already, but I am not quite clear on something. The google searches he did on his laptop showed up on his son’s ipad because they sync’d through a shared apple account? Did he remove his search history on the laptop? So he was not aware that the ipad would sync with his laptop?

That is basically what happened though I am not sure he ever actually deleted the searches off his laptop.

The iPad was searched by consent after Walshe foolishly surrendered it. His Attorney Miner tried to claim pre-trial that he never consented to a full extraction of the iPad but it's clear he surrendered it because he thought it was clean. Unfortunately for him, his apple account was connected to that iPad, so the searches were extracted from it.

Based on the iPad extraction, the CW immediately applied for search warrants and seized his other devices and extracted them. IIRC at trial, what was presented was the actual laptop extraction.

IMO

 

[Seattle1]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000627948974723238

 

[Niner]

@Sillybilly - maybe when you have time you can change the Title to GUILTY!

 

[MerlinFalcon]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000627948974723238

What a difference between this judge and the one in the Karen Read case.