I was going back through some of the old media and found this:
Link
here
I think there are all kinds of ways you could look at that kind of obsession.
Good find - I never saw that information about the texting after he died. I would love to see those 71 posthumous texts as well as the damaging ones we saw from the prosecution. I am sure the defense will be using those to show her mental state.
I do see evidence of OCD - even sticking with the relationship. She gets a focus whether positive or negative and continues.. Her relationship with him and seeing him through to death was her control over that obsession. The fund raiser was another - with a positive result.
OCD, depression, anxiety and borderline personality disorder are likely but nothing more serious that would excuse her from assisting (coordinating) a suicide. IMO
I AM NOT A PSYCHOLOGIST. Just my uneducated opinion. Not only that, no one can diagnose from afar with no contact, so MOO.
I don't know what direction the defense is trying to go but his 1st amendment and brainwashing arguments are just as lame as involuntary manslaughter, IMO.
Assisted suicide laws in the MA General Laws only pertain to Physician Assisted Suicide and I can't find a law regarding a lay person assisting a suicide, so I think the prosecution had very little choice as to what to charge her with. With that, my opinion is that this case has a very good chance of being dismissed, sadly.
Unfortunately, 2 mentally ill people coordinating on a bad idea may not qualify as a felony. OR this case could be a groundbreaking case that will result in new laws that will catch up to the technology utilized in this case.
Having said that, she is still despicable, evil, egocentric, narcissistic, etc. and her family nurtures those defects in her IMO.
:cow: